Member

Sérgio HUMBERTO

EPP · Portugal

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Portugal
Roll-call participation: 97.9 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 94.1 %ⓘ of 505 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: AD Aliança Democrática
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 20 of 464 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL, ENVI (substitute), SANT (substitute), TRAN
Member id: 257065

National party: AD Aliança Democrática
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 20 of 464 votesⓘ
Committees: EMPL, ENVI (substitute), SANT (substitute), TRAN
Member id: 257065

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.9 %

505 of 516 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 90.7 % (+7.2 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.1 %

475 of 505 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.3 % (+0.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.3 %

20 of 464 votes where their group had a clear line

12 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.0 %

15 of 505 votes cast

Participation 97.9 % — EPP median 90.7 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sérgio HUMBERTO	97.9 %
EPP median	90.7 %
Lowest in the group	22.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	190

With majority line 94.1 % — EPP median 93.3 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sérgio HUMBERTO	94.1 %
EPP median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	61.4 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	190

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	17
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	0
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	128
24 Oct 2024	13	12
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	56
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL	EPP	Portugal	98 % of 5 040 shared	89 %
Select Paulo CUNHA	Paulo CUNHA	EPP	Portugal	98 % of 5 618 shared	89 %
Select Sebastião BUGALHO	Sebastião BUGALHO	EPP	Portugal	97 % of 5 284 shared	89 %
Select Lídia PEREIRA	Lídia PEREIRA	EPP	Portugal	97 % of 5 221 shared	89 %
Select Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Hélder SOUSA SILVA	EPP	Portugal	97 % of 5 005 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	96 % of 4 467 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	95 % of 4 677 shared	89 %
Select Sabine VERHEYEN	Sabine VERHEYEN	EPP	Germany	95 % of 4 743 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	95 % of 4 606 shared	89 %
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	EPP	Germany	95 % of 5 677 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 5 159 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	87 % of 5 030 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 5 675 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	86 % of 3 819 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 5 181 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	86 % of 4 530 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	86 % of 5 549 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	86 % of 5 610 shared	82 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	86 % of 5 326 shared	82 %
Select Stine BOSSE	Stine BOSSE	Renew	Denmark	85 % of 5 606 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Member	7 Oct 2024	now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-MX Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Cohesion Policy and Outermost RegionsIG10-08 Intergroup / working group	Member	25 Feb 2025	now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	ENVI	14 Jul 2026
1st Session of the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly (Ezulwini Valley, Mbabane, Eswatini)	Official delegation	DAFR	5 May 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	EMPL	5 May 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SANT	21 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	EMPL	15 Apr 2026
Air passenger rights - 2013/0072 (COD)	Trilogue negotiator		13 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SANT	28 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Opinion rapporteur	EMPL	16 Jan 2026
Pan-African-Parliament-Midrand	Official delegation	DAFR	13 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	SANT	21 Oct 2025

Show all 25 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

41 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	European solidarity: key to securing medicine access in a shifting geopolitical era (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	Cali fund – follow up from the COP16 UN Convention on Biodiversity (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	AccessibleEU and the strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities: state of play and the future of EU accessibility policy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Violence in the Great Lakes Region, particularly in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
23 Mar 2026	EU support for Mozambique P-10-2026-001206	Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors	9 Jun 2026
1 Feb 2026	Mechanisms to address the impact of Storm Kristin in Portugal P-10-2026-000402	Priority written questionwith 5 co-authors	18 Mar 2026
8 Dec 2025	Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
4 Jun 2025	Proposta de revisão da Diretiva 2014/45/EU — Elimina a possibilidade de exceções às IPO de motociclos P-10-2025-002245	Priority written questionwith 5 co-authors	28 Jul 2025
7 May 2025	Power outage in Portugal and Spain E-10-2025-001841	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	9 Sept 2025
27 Mar 2025	The risk of polycrisis in the immediate future E-10-2025-001298	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	20 Jun 2025
11 Mar 2025	Impact of tariffs and quota systems on downstream steel manufacturing in the EU E-10-2025-001037	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	15 May 2025
7 Nov 2024	EU-NATO high-level task force P-10-2024-002464	Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors	10 Mar 2025
10 Oct 2024	Defence of the public interest in the nationalisation of Efacec E-10-2024-002013	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	19 Nov 2024
3 Sept 2024	Urgent adoption of the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) E-10-2024-001605	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	17 Oct 2024
3 Sept 2024	Defence of taxpayers’ rights in the European Union E-10-2024-001604	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	21 Oct 2024
3 Sept 2024	Financial literacy in Europe E-10-2024-001606	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	4 Nov 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 42

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958	AGRI	8
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	10
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916	AGRI	11
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917	AGRI	11
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918	AGRI	17
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919	AGRI	11
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954	AGRI	7
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	8
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956	AGRI	14
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957	AGRI	10

Show all 42 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Portugal National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257065?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sérgio HUMBERTO”. Member record. memberId 257065. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257065?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257065. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257065?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257065,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sérgio HUMBERTO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257065?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257065?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257065. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257065. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 12

Amendments tabled in committee, 42

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928