Member

Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ

EPP · Poland

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 72.9 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 91.5 %ⓘ of 376 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 6 of 338 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 257045

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 6 of 338 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 257045

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

72.9 %

376 of 516 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 90.7 % (−17.8 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.5 %

344 of 376 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.3 % (−1.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.8 %

6 of 338 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

2 of 376 votes cast

Participation 72.9 % — EPP median 90.7 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	72.9 %
EPP median	90.7 %
Lowest in the group	22.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	190

With majority line 91.5 % — EPP median 93.3 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	91.5 %
EPP median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	61.4 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	190

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	22
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	91
7 Oct 2024	2	0
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	17
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	0
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	0
24 Oct 2024	13	12
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	56
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	44

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	EPP	Poland	98 % of 4 970 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	EPP	Poland	97 % of 4 937 shared	89 %
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 330 shared	89 %
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 220 shared	89 %
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 095 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej BUŁA	Andrzej BUŁA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 4 905 shared	89 %
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	EPP	Poland	97 % of 4 773 shared	89 %
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 261 shared	89 %
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 278 shared	89 %
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 216 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	85 % of 4 795 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	85 % of 3 805 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 3 788 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	84 % of 4 753 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 5 207 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	84 % of 4 431 shared	82 %
Select Grégory ALLIONE	Grégory ALLIONE	Renew	France	84 % of 4 565 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	84 % of 4 170 shared	82 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	84 % of 3 310 shared	75 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	84 % of 4 032 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR Delegation	Substitute	3 Jul 2026	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	3 Jul 2026	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	16 Jan 2025	now

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	14 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	7 Sept 2026
The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its interaction with national authorities in the application of Union law, with particular reference to Article 19 TEU	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	JURI	11 Jun 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	EUDS	22 Mar 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	9 Feb 2026
Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	9 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	29 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	21 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	18 Sept 2025
Proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	10 Sept 2025

Show all 22 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

50 contributions recorded, 4 written statements; 7 on behalf of their group; 72 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Defending European democracy and the integrity of the European Parliament in light of revelations that an MEP was subject to surveillance by illegal spyware (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the Action Plan on Cybersecurity and AI (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Immunity of International Criminal Court officials and the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to strengthen EU strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 73

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0350	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
17 Jun 2026	Recognition of obesity as a chronic disease under EU public health policy E-10-2026-002516	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	24 Aug 2026
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328	Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—

Show all 73 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 23

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967	CJ72	3
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791874	CJ72	2
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058	CJ65	1
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059	CJ65	1
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061	CJ65	2
19 May 2026	Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693 CJ03-AM-788926	CJ03	16
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784433	EUDS	4
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367	EUDS	1
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784405	EUDS	7
12 Feb 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784406	EUDS	3

Show all 23 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257045?period=2024&scope=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ”. Member record. memberId 257045. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257045?period=2024&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257045. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257045?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257045,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257045?period=2024&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257045?period=2024&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257045. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257045. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 73

Amendments tabled in committee, 23

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928