Member

Erik KALIŇÁK

No group · Slovakia

Group: No group NI
Country: Slovakia
Roll-call participation: 99.4 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: —ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.

More facts (5)

National party: SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: —ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees: LIBE
Member id: 257007

National party: SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: —ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees: LIBE
Member id: 257007

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.4 %

513 of 516 roll calls while in office

Non-attached median: 92.1 %

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

12.7 %

65 of 513 votes cast

Participation 99.4 % — Non-attached median 92.1 %, 30 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 30 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Erik KALIŇÁK	99.4 %
Non-attached median	92.1 %
Lowest in the group	41.5 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	30

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	23
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	128
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	34
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ	Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ	No group	Slovakia	89 % of 5 236 shared	44 %
Select Monika BEŇOVÁ	Monika BEŇOVÁ	No group	Slovakia	84 % of 4 443 shared	44 %
Select Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ	Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ	No group	Slovakia	82 % of 5 284 shared	44 %
Select Ľuboš BLAHA	Ľuboš BLAHA	No group	Slovakia	79 % of 5 090 shared	44 %
Select Kateřina KONEČNÁ	Kateřina KONEČNÁ	No group	Czechia	71 % of 4 885 shared	44 %
Select Ondřej DOSTÁL	Ondřej DOSTÁL	No group	Czechia	70 % of 4 997 shared	44 %
Select Aldo PATRICIELLO	Aldo PATRICIELLO	Patriots	Italy	65 % of 2 171 shared	51 %
Select Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Galato ALEXANDRAKI	ECR	Greece	65 % of 3 543 shared	48 %
Select Fernand KARTHEISER	Fernand KARTHEISER changed group	No group	Luxembourg	64 % of 5 107 shared	45 %
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	ECR	Greece	63 % of 5 208 shared	48 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	15 Sept 2026

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded, 7 written statements; 30 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate)	Statement	Read
9 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 33 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 109

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
17 Sept 2026	Horizon Europe, or when science ends and a political project begins E-10-2026-003729	Written question	Not yet answered
15 Sept 2026	Cost-efficiency of remote reading of existing meters and heat cost allocators pursuant to Article 16(2) of Directive (EU) 2023/1791 E-10-2026-003683	Written question	Not yet answered
15 Sept 2026	Does Article 16 of Directive (EU) 2023/1791 require a specific remote reading technology? E-10-2026-003684	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	The largest EU budget in history. And on top of that, hidden EU-wide taxes for businesses and households. E-10-2026-003488	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	Member States and businesses have to comply with increasingly stringent rules. When drafting those rules, however, the Commission itself abandons its own principles E-10-2026-003487	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	Latvia is asking for an additional EUR 7 billion. Will the cost of cutting ties with Russia be borne by the EU’s common budget? E-10-2026-003492	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	EUR 200 billion for Global Europe, EUR 100 billion for Ukraine. And at home, new levies on businesses and households E-10-2026-003489	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	Even Iceland has said ‘no’ to the EU. When a developed European country remains outside the EU, is there a problem in Brussels as well? E-10-2026-003491	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	Blank cheque first, details to follow. Why should the EU approve billions when it does not know what they will be spent on? E-10-2026-003490	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	The Commission is reaching for household savings. Who will bear the losses when it channels them into political projects? E-10-2026-003486	Written question	Not yet answered
3 Sept 2026	21 rounds of sanctions behind us – number 22 on the way. What exactly have the sanctions against Russia achieved so far? E-10-2026-003493	Written question	Not yet answered
25 Jun 2026	Green renovations at the price of debt? The Commission must explain who will pay – owners, tenants or the middle class? E-10-2026-002626	Written question	27 Aug 2026
25 Jun 2026	Billions into the grid, but who pays the bill? Industry and households are facing the prospect of paying the bill for the EU’s green transition E-10-2026-002628	Written question	27 Aug 2026
25 Jun 2026	The EU’s AI dream could turn into a nightmare – without energy, the US and China will overtake us and we’ll end up paying more for electricity! E-10-2026-002625	Written question	27 Aug 2026
25 Jun 2026	The EU’s green dream is turning into a nightmare: massive transfer of car production to China and layoffs in Europe? E-10-2026-002627	Written question	11 Aug 2026
24 Jun 2026	ECB’s decision to raise interest rates and its impact on the rising cost of living O-10-2026-000028	Oral questionwith 39 co-authors	Not yet answered
11 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
4 Jun 2026	Millions of euros for sanctions and aid to Ukraine, while the EU is becoming poorer. How much longer can we afford to pay for sanctions against Russia? E-10-2026-002289	Written question	13 Jul 2026
4 Jun 2026	EUR 150 billion for EU defence. How much of this will the Slovak defence industry actually receive? E-10-2026-002291	Written question	7 Aug 2026
4 Jun 2026	Only a few per cent of migrants are actually deported. Will the new regulation finally change this? E-10-2026-002293	Written question	16 Sept 2026
4 Jun 2026	Thousands of jobs in energy-intensive industries under pressure from Brussels. The Commission’s response? E-10-2026-002290	Written question	1 Sept 2026
4 Jun 2026	The conflict in the Middle East has made energy more expensive. How much has this cost Slovak industry, and what is Brussels doing about it? E-10-2026-002294	Written question	13 Aug 2026
12 May 2026	Is the EU risking a new crisis and a loss of trust among Member States over the Beneš Decrees? E-10-2026-001958	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
12 May 2026	Is the Commission secretly preparing to repeal the Beneš Decrees? Is postwar Europe at risk of falling apart? E-10-2026-001956	Written questionwith 1 co-author	7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026	Is Brussels seeking to revise the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? Will the EU risk destabilising Central Europe over these decrees? E-10-2026-001957	Written questionwith 1 co-author	7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026	Is the Council afraid to openly stand up for the postwar order – the end of the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? E-10-2026-001959	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
15 Apr 2026	Interference with the sovereignty of a Member State as a requirement for the release of frozen EU funds? E-10-2026-001530	Written questionwith 1 co-author	15 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026	What steps has the Commission taken to safeguard the integrity of its actions and public trust? E-10-2026-001526	Written question	12 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026	Does the President of the Commission intend to use the Hungarian elections to abolish the veto in the EU’s foreign policy? E-10-2026-001529	Written questionwith 1 co-author	28 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026	Green transition or just a rip-off? Millions of euros from citizens’ pockets will flow into Brussels funds, but will this result in cleaner air? E-10-2026-001253	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	12 May 2026
25 Mar 2026	Does the Commission want to secretly push through ‘parenthood’ from commercial surrogacy and circumvent prohibitions in force in traditional states? E-10-2026-001252	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	27 May 2026
24 Mar 2026	A threat against one country is a threat against the entire Union … unless it’s Ukraine attacking Budapest and Bratislava! E-10-2026-001223	Written question	13 May 2026
24 Mar 2026	How is it possible for the EU to fund something that is illegal in many countries? Is the Commission openly encouraging the violation of the Treaties? E-10-2026-001222	Written question	15 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026	Use of the ‘borderline content’ handbook promoted at the EU Internet Forum for moderating lawful political speech E-10-2026-001160	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	19 May 2026
10 Mar 2026	Zelenskyy threatens Orbán with Ukrainian tanks: When will the EU stop tolerating these crazy threats? E-10-2026-000994	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	7 May 2026
5 Mar 2026	Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923	Written questionwith 37 co-authors	4 May 2026
3 Mar 2026	Three years since the railway accident in Tempi, Greece O-10-2026-000010	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
26 Feb 2026	Vice-President / High Representative Kallas’s hawkish turn: from experts to soldiers – Brussels putting pressure on Hungary and Slovakia E-10-2026-000807	Written questionwith 1 co-author	26 May 2026
24 Feb 2026	‘We’ll go in and take what we need’ – Yevhen Dykyi shocks the EU, but where is the response? E-10-2026-000757	Written question	24 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026	Is the Commission still the guardian of the Treaties, or does it now see itself as the unconstrained ruler of the EU? E-10-2026-000606	Written questionwith 1 co-author	19 May 2026
9 Feb 2026	Is the DSA ultimately a tool for silencing inconvenient opinions? E-10-2026-000528	Written question	20 Apr 2026
9 Feb 2026	Who gave the Commission the mandate to interfere in elections? E-10-2026-000527	Written question	14 Apr 2026
4 Feb 2026	Legal basis and extent of EU debt: facilities for Ukraine, Moldova and the Balkans E-10-2026-000444	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	29 Jun 2026
26 Jan 2026	Double standards in EU foreign policy? E-10-2026-000290	Written question	18 Mar 2026
26 Jan 2026	Does the Commission consider children to be legally competent to make decisions about their gender? E-10-2026-000288	Written question	19 Mar 2026
26 Jan 2026	Selective assertiveness in EU foreign policy? E-10-2026-000287	Written question	31 Mar 2026
29 Dec 2025	Penalties based on the Digital Services Act against the platform X P-10-2025-005077	Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors	17 Feb 2026
19 Dec 2025	Multi-million euro fine against X to enforce the EU censorship agenda under the guise of alleged violations of transparency obligations under the DSA O-10-2025-000047	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
3 Dec 2025	Will the corruption scandal have an impact on EU funding for Ukraine? E-10-2025-004800	Written question	27 Feb 2026
3 Dec 2025	What is the real purpose of the European Democracy Shield? E-10-2025-004801	Written question	27 Feb 2026
1 Dec 2025	Is changing children’s gender a hoax or a real Commission plan? E-10-2025-004740	Written question	18 Feb 2026
19 Nov 2025	Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042	Oral questionwith 40 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Nov 2025	EU plan to promote gender self-ID without age limits under LGBTIQ+ equality strategy 2026-2030 O-10-2025-000041	Oral questionwith 43 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Nov 2025	Providing financial and regulatory incentives for nuclear energy in the EU E-10-2025-004561	Written questionwith 47 co-authors	23 Mar 2026
22 Oct 2025	Unacceptable reference to gender self-identification ‘without age restrictions’ in the EU LGBTIQ+ equality strategy for 2026-2030 E-10-2025-004172	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	6 Jan 2026
15 Oct 2025	Knowledge Centre as a new Chat Control? E-10-2025-004041	Written question	6 Jan 2026
15 Oct 2025	LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy 2026 - 2030: changing children’s gender identity even without parental consent? E-10-2025-004040	Written question	6 Jan 2026
1 Oct 2025	Safety inspection of electric vehicles in the EU technical inspection system E-10-2025-003819	Written question	8 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025	Combating monopolies in the technical inspection sector and supporting small businesses E-10-2025-003816	Written question	19 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025	Introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in technical inspections of vehicles E-10-2025-003818	Written question	8 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025	Coordination of social security systems in the EU E-10-2025-003800	Written question	10 Nov 2025
1 Oct 2025	Uniform standards for the evaluation of faults during technical inspections of vehicles E-10-2025-003820	Written question	8 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025	Harmonisation of rules on technical and emissions inspections of vehicles through directives instead of regulations E-10-2025-003817	Written question	8 Dec 2025
23 Sept 2025	Highly concerning comments by VP/HR Kaja Kallas at EUISS event E-10-2025-003692	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	19 Dec 2025
23 Sept 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal murders of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska and US political activist Charlie Kirk, and the need to defend vulnerable individuals and uphold law and order B-10-2025-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 82 co-authors	—
22 Sept 2025	Risk of unfair competition due to method of calculating tyre emissions E-10-2025-003665	Written questionwith 14 co-authors	3 Dec 2025
15 Sept 2025	Commission’s respect for pledges made to Member States E-10-2025-003536	Written question	16 Dec 2025
15 Sept 2025	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0402	Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors	—
10 Sept 2025	The Digital Services Act (DSA) as a tool to silence opponents E-10-2025-003513	Written question	7 Nov 2025
10 Sept 2025	Ban on Russian gas imports versus energy security E-10-2025-003512	Written question	3 Dec 2025
10 Sept 2025	Withdrawal from the ban on the sale of cars with internal combustion engines E-10-2025-003511	Written question	29 Oct 2025
3 Sept 2025	Does the Commission only disseminate verified information? E-10-2025-003391	Written question	10 Dec 2025
3 Sept 2025	Does the Commission represent the interests of EU citizens? E-10-2025-003390	Written question	20 Oct 2025
3 Sept 2025	Annual technical inspections of vehicles – what is the real motive behind the Commission’s proposal? E-10-2025-003389	Written question	8 Dec 2025
1 Sept 2025	European Court of Auditors special report 11/2025 on Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs E-10-2025-003339	Written questionwith 57 co-authors	25 Nov 2025
15 Jul 2025	Transparency of NGOs E-10-2025-002883	Written question	3 Sept 2025
14 Jul 2025	The Commission's Rule of Law Report E-10-2025-002852	Written question	21 Aug 2025
14 Jul 2025	Is respect for the law an element of the rule of law? E-10-2025-002853	Written question	19 Sept 2025
14 Jul 2025	Geographical balance in the institutions E-10-2025-002854	Written question	13 Oct 2025
2 Jul 2025	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0319	Motion for a resolutionwith 76 co-authors	—
24 Jun 2025	Who will benefit from ETS2 and the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive? E-10-2025-002526	Written question	26 Sept 2025
23 Jun 2025	Possible suspension of the Association Agreement with Israel E-10-2025-002512	Written question	8 Sept 2025
23 Jun 2025	Constructive discussion and loyal cooperation ‘replaced’ by a different legal basis? E-10-2025-002510	Written question	14 Aug 2025
23 Jun 2025	The Commission and the Coalition of the Willing E-10-2025-002508	Written question	12 Aug 2025
23 Jun 2025	Lobbying by services of the European Commission E-10-2025-002494	Written question	27 Aug 2025
23 Jun 2025	Backlash against financing aid to Ukraine E-10-2025-002495	Written question	6 Aug 2025
12 Jun 2025	EU potentially reestablishing relations with Russia P-10-2025-002380	Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors	10 Jul 2025
9 Apr 2025	Commission’s call to Europeans to ‘prepare a stockpile of supplies for 72 hours’ E-10-2025-001449	Written question	18 Jun 2025
26 Mar 2025	Tightening of import quotas for steel E-10-2025-001257	Written question	20 May 2025
26 Mar 2025	Digital driving licences E-10-2025-001256	Written question	22 May 2025
21 Mar 2025	EU Talent Pool E-10-2025-001212	Written question	20 Jun 2025
6 Mar 2025	Clarification of the concept of ‘interference’ in democratic debate and elections E-10-2025-000959	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	3 Jun 2025
5 Mar 2025	Executive agency for education, culture and audiovisual – recovery of funds E-10-2025-000933	Written question	21 May 2025
18 Feb 2025	Summit on Ukraine and Security in Europe – the Commission’s mandate E-10-2025-000729	Written question	28 May 2025
11 Feb 2025	Impact studies on measures taken under the Green Deal E-10-2025-000625	Written question	11 Apr 2025
10 Feb 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on safeguarding the right to freedom of speech online B-10-2025-0099	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
4 Feb 2025	US restrictions on AI chip exports to EU Member States P-10-2025-000495	Priority written questionwith 8 co-authors	25 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025	The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	24 Mar 2025
27 Jan 2025	Commission funding to environmental NGOs to condition the views of Members of the European Parliament E-10-2025-000357	Written questionwith 64 co-authors	5 May 2025
27 Jan 2025	Former Commissioner Thierry Breton’s new lobbying activities for Bank of America E-10-2025-000358	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	3 Apr 2025
22 Jan 2025	US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000276	Written question	19 Mar 2025
22 Jan 2025	Thierry Breton’s statements to the media E-10-2025-000278	Written question	24 Apr 2025
22 Jan 2025	Withdrawal of the USA from the WHO E-10-2025-000277	Written question	9 Apr 2025
15 Jan 2025	The Constitutional Court of Romania’s decision from the perspective of rules on the rule of law E-10-2025-000133	Written question	10 Apr 2025
17 Dec 2024	Impact of the Court of Justice’s judgment in the Inkreal case on the jurisdiction of courts in the Member States E-10-2024-002994	Written question	24 Feb 2025
14 Dec 2024	New EU fleet-wide CO<sub>2</sub> emission standards for passenger cars and light commercial vehicles P-10-2024-002955	Priority written questionwith 22 co-authors	15 Jan 2025
13 Nov 2024	Georgia’s law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ and its compliance with EU law and fundamental values E-10-2024-002521	Written question	7 Feb 2025
4 Nov 2024	Ensuring sustainable, decent and affordable housing in Europe E-10-2024-002392	Written question	10 Jan 2025
10 Oct 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119	Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 55

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898	AGRI	2
17 Jul 2026	Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100	AGRI	15
14 Jul 2026	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2025 PETI-AM-790995	PETI	36
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918	AGRI	16
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919	AGRI	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954	AGRI	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964	AGRI	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899	AGRI	2

Show all 55 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Non-attached members No group · Not a group — members sitting without affiliation

National delegation

Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Erik KALIŇÁK”. Member record. memberId 257007. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257007. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257007?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257007,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Erik KALIŇÁK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257007?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257007. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257007. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}