Skip to content

Member

Murielle LAURENT

S&D · France

Group
S&D
Country
France
Roll-call participation
90.1 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
90.8 %ⓘ of 465 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 95.3 %
More facts (5)
National party
PS Parti socialiste
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
33 of 453 votesⓘ
Committees
DEVE, LIBE, PETI
Member id
256899
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

90.1 %

465 of 516 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 93.4 % (−3.3 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.8 %

422 of 465 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 95.3 % (−4.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.3 %

33 of 453 votes where their group had a clear line

24 opposite (for ↔ against), 7 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.7 %

8 of 465 votes cast

Participation 90.1 % — S&D median 93.4 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Murielle LAURENT90.1 %
S&D median93.4 %
Lowest in the group2.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 90.8 % — S&D median 95.3 %, 136 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Murielle LAURENT90.8 %
S&D median95.3 %
Lowest in the group70.4 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members136
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202421
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249271
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241817
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129118
24 Oct 20241311
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 2024188
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244542

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance99 % of 3 923 shared93 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance99 % of 4 902 shared93 %
Eric SARGIACOMO S&DFrance99 % of 5 221 shared93 %
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance99 % of 4 511 shared93 %
Christophe CLERGEAU S&DFrance99 % of 4 699 shared93 %
Pierre JOUVET S&DFrance98 % of 4 737 shared93 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance98 % of 5 332 shared93 %
Nora MEBAREK S&DFrance98 % of 5 018 shared93 %
Claire FITA S&DFrance98 % of 4 358 shared93 %
Chloé RIDEL S&DFrance98 % of 3 555 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands88 % of 4 978 shared83 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany87 % of 4 998 shared83 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands87 % of 4 291 shared83 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands87 % of 4 993 shared83 %
Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ RenewSlovakia87 % of 4 201 shared86 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland87 % of 4 648 shared83 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany87 % of 5 356 shared83 %
Tineke STRIK GreensNetherlands87 % of 5 074 shared83 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium87 % of 4 775 shared83 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany87 % of 5 372 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countriesDMAS DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working groupMember24 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE18 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE2 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDEVE9 Jun 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurPETI19 May 2026
Delegation to the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development (July 2026)Official delegation16 Apr 2026
Union Civil Protection Mechanism and Union support for health emergency preparedness and response, and repealing Decision No 1313/2013/EU (Union Civil Protection Mechanism)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionDEVE2 Feb 2026
Establishing the Union support for the Schengen area, for European integrated border management and for the common policy on visas for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteurLIBE16 Dec 2025
Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionDEVE12 Nov 2025
Delegation for relations with the Pan-African Parliament (DPAP)\n\nEP AD HOC MISSION\nPRE-AFRICAN UNION–EU SUMMIT PARLIAMENTARY MEETING\nMIDRAND, JOHANNESBURG \n(SOUTH AFRICA)\n \n14-15 NOVEMBER 2025\nOfficial delegation11 Nov 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDEVE7 Oct 2025

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

44 contributions recorded; 9 on behalf of their group; 54 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) SpeechRead
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Joint communication on humanitarian aid (JOIN(2026)0025) (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre on behalf of S&DSpeech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) (debate) on behalf of S&DSpeech · 2 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 59

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
2 Sept 2026Protecting workers from extreme heatwaves E-10-2026-003456Written questionwith 8 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Serious statements by Markus Lammert regarding the expulsion of unaccompanied children and persons in need of international protection in Ceuta E-10-2026-003413Written questionwith 15 co-authorsNot yet answered
22 Jul 2026Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097Written questionwith 23 co-authors22 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950Written questionwith 31 co-authors11 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026Preserving EU capacities to produce paper pulp and cellulose fibres – state of affairs at Fibre Excellence P-10-2026-002901Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors12 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0318Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
10 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
23 Apr 2026Risks hanging over the European steel industry and use of public funding by ArcelorMittal E-10-2026-001682Written questionwith 12 co-authors8 Jun 2026
16 Apr 2026The use of Afghan paramilitaries by the Greek authorities for pushbacks E-10-2026-001563Written questionwith 13 co-authors19 Jun 2026
26 Mar 2026Continued EU political and financial support to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) P-10-2026-001277Priority written questionwith 27 co-authors6 May 2026
11 Mar 2026New York Times revelations on detention conditions in Bulgaria E-10-2026-001018Written questionwith 6 co-authors26 May 2026
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the arbitrary detention of President Mohamed Bazoum by the junta in Niger B-10-2026-0163Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
25 Feb 2026The US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), transfers of tax data to non-EU countries, and compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation E-10-2026-000805Written questionwith 1 co-author29 Apr 2026
2 Feb 2026Suspension of the EU-Qatar aviation agreement E-10-2026-000413Written questionwith 14 co-authors16 Apr 2026
21 Jan 2026Police raid on LGBT persons in Baku and Azerbaijan’s human rights obligations towards the EU E-10-2026-000215Written questionwith 12 co-authors5 May 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
12 Jan 2026Venezuela and violation of the UN Charter E-10-2026-000065Written questionwith 14 co-authors23 Feb 2026
7 Jan 2026Consequences for Hungary’s non-compliance with the Court of Justice of the European Union asylum judgement E-10-2026-000032Written questionwith 18 co-authors31 Mar 2026
25 Nov 2025The situation in Sudan and the ongoing negotiations with the United Arab Emirates E-10-2025-004685Written questionwith 22 co-authors26 Feb 2026
24 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan B-10-2025-0519Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors—
19 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on protection of EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materials B-10-2025-0500Motion for a resolutionwith 71 co-authors—
11 Nov 2025Forced returns of Afghan women to Afghanistan under Taliban rule P-10-2025-004474Priority written questionwith 16 co-authors9 Jan 2026
22 Oct 2025Delay in reporting by the Commission E-10-2025-004164Written questionwith 7 co-authors13 Jan 2026
14 Oct 2025Provision of EU training to Libyan non-governmental entity deeply involved in both war crimes and crimes against humanity E-10-2025-004025Written questionwith 9 co-authors23 Jan 2026
6 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in Cabaret B-10-2025-0434Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
3 Oct 2025Conflict of interest and regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) P-10-2025-003902Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors21 Jan 2026
25 Sept 2025Human rights violations in Mauritania E-10-2025-003728Written questionwith 1 co-author19 Jan 2026
23 Sept 2025How will the Commission improve transparency in the next Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (NDICI-GE) regulation? E-10-2025-003691Written questionwith 16 co-authors21 Jan 2026
19 Sept 2025Suspension of the EU-Qatar agreement on air transport O-10-2025-000031Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Sept 2025Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive and the effective implementation of the Polluter Pays principle E-10-2025-003552Written questionwith 7 co-authors11 Nov 2025
15 Sept 2025Situation of the silicon industry in Europe and in France P-10-2025-003550Priority written questionwith 12 co-authors13 Nov 2025
28 Aug 2025Attack against a humanitarian rescue vessel E-10-2025-003330Written questionwith 25 co-authors5 Dec 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 10 June 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add Algeria, Angola, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal and Venezuela to the list of high-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with the FATF, and to remove Barbados, Gibraltar, Jamaica, Panama, the Philippines, Senegal, Uganda and the United Arab Emirates from that list B-10-2025-0315Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
16 Jun 2025Protection of Hungarian citizens’ fundamental rights in the context of biometric identification and surveillance at public gatherings E-10-2025-002415Written questionwith 59 co-authors1 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025US decision to suspend student visas and social media screening E-10-2025-002295Written questionwith 45 co-authors12 Aug 2025
4 Jun 2025‘Safe third country’ concept E-10-2025-002241Written questionwith 35 co-authors4 Aug 2025
2 Jun 2025Access for humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip E-10-2025-002193Written questionwith 21 co-authors4 Aug 2025
6 May 2025Adoption of targeted sanctions against military individuals responsible for lethal attacks on civilians and other serious human rights violations in Sudan E-10-2025-001817Written questionwith 19 co-authors16 Jun 2025
13 Mar 2025Welcoming US scientists and researchers to Europe after Trump administration budget cuts E-10-2025-001093Written questionwith 11 co-authors15 May 2025
12 Mar 2025Menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2025-001083Written questionwith 38 co-authors16 Jun 2025
12 Mar 2025International child abduction and implementation of the Brussels IIb Regulation E-10-2025-001054Written questionwith 2 co-authors22 May 2025
12 Mar 2025Period poverty in the EU: actions by the Commission E-10-2025-001082Written questionwith 40 co-authors13 Jun 2025
7 Mar 2025Impact of the Commission’s plan to consolidate development offices in EU delegations in 18 hubs and close 80 offices E-10-2025-001005Written questionwith 5 co-authors15 May 2025
3 Feb 2025Obstacle to competition in France’s outlying territories: upholding EU law in the face of the high cost of living P-10-2025-000461Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors31 Mar 2025
30 Jan 2025Meta’s recent decision to end fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp in the United States E-10-2025-000423Written questionwith 31 co-authors31 Mar 2025
28 Jan 2025Recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the systematic practice of pushbacks in Greece E-10-2025-000386Written questionwith 17 co-authors15 May 2025
17 Jan 2025Actual or foreseeable negative effects of Elon Musk’s statements on civic discourse, electoral processes and freedom and pluralism of the media under the DSA E-10-2025-000191Written questionwith 47 co-authors5 Mar 2025
14 Jan 2025Violations identified by the Council of Europe anti-torture committee in detention and return centres in Italy E-10-2025-000124Written questionwith 31 co-authors29 Apr 2025
9 Dec 2024The spread of disinformation by recommender systems and other automated mechanisms as a systemic risk under the Digital Services Act E-10-2024-002826Written questionwith 39 co-authors19 Feb 2025
5 Dec 2024The role of TikTok in the Romanian presidential election E-10-2024-002794Written questionwith 36 co-authors11 Feb 2025
26 Nov 2024Conflicts of interest and political interference by Elon Musk E-10-2024-002653Written questionwith 29 co-authors20 Feb 2025
21 Nov 2024Change of algorithm on X before US election P-10-2024-002623Priority written questionwith 41 co-authors12 Feb 2025
17 Oct 2024Implementation of the ICJ advisory opinion as regards EU trade with illegal Israeli settlements E-10-2024-002150Written questionwith 29 co-authors15 Jan 2025
1 Oct 2024Use of Pegasus and other types of spyware in Slovakia E-10-2024-001920Written questionwith 34 co-authors28 Nov 2024
24 Sept 2024Human rights violations by EU-funded forces in Tunisia E-10-2024-001795Written questionwith 48 co-authors12 Mar 2025
14 Sept 2024Recent massacre in the Al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ in the Gaza Strip P-10-2024-001714Priority written questionwith 18 co-authors18 Dec 2024
26 Jul 2024Termination of housing rights for Ukrainian refugees in Hungary P-10-2024-001430Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors1 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Murielle LAURENT”. Member record. memberId 256899. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256899?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256899. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256899?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256899,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Murielle LAURENT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256899?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256899?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256899. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256899. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}