Skip to content

Member

Pascale PIERA

Patriots · France

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
France
Roll-call participation
86.0 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
93.2 %ⓘ of 438 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 77.2 %
More facts (5)
National party
RN Rassemblement national
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
1 of 341 votesⓘ
Committees
JURI, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
256877
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

86.0 %

444 of 516 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (−7.3 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.2 %

408 of 438 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 77.2 % (+16.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.3 %

1 of 341 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

12.6 %

56 of 444 votes cast

Participation 86.0 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 86 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Pascale PIERA86.0 %
Patriots median93.3 %
Lowest in the group23.1 %
Highest in the group100.0 %
Members86
With majority line 93.2 % — Patriots median 77.2 %, 86 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Pascale PIERA93.2 %
Patriots median77.2 %
Lowest in the group67.3 %
Highest in the group95.1 %
Members86
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 2024570
17 Dec 2024130
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244545

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jean-Paul GARRAUD PatriotsFrance100 % of 4 668 shared74 %
Julien LEONARDELLI PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 749 shared74 %
Séverine WERBROUCK PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 604 shared74 %
Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN PatriotsFrance99 % of 5 123 shared74 %
Fabrice LEGGERI PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 940 shared74 %
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 853 shared74 %
Valérie DELOGE PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 984 shared74 %
Aleksandar NIKOLIC PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 594 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 099 shared74 %
Julien SANCHEZ PatriotsFrance99 % of 4 857 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance78 % of 4 344 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance78 % of 4 030 shared70 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance77 % of 4 895 shared68 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance76 % of 4 555 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 4 288 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania74 % of 4 164 shared51 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany71 % of 3 873 shared68 %
Galato ALEXANDRAKI ECRGreece71 % of 3 283 shared68 %
René AUST ESNGermany71 % of 4 647 shared70 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany71 % of 3 752 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Arab PeninsulaDARP DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assemblySubstitute12 Dec 2024now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupMember20 Feb 2025now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeMember19 Jul 202426 Apr 2026

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 29 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
8 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 Jan 2026The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
16 Dec 2025Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
25 Nov 2025Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Oct 2025Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements (A10-0197/2025 - Jörgen Warborn) (vote) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Sept 2025Need for a strong European Democracy Shield to enhance democracy, protect the EU from foreign interference and hybrid threats, and protect electoral processes in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 86

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026The 28th regime/EU Inc.: can the Commission guarantee the soundness of its legal basis? P-10-2026-003589Priority written questionwith 17 co-authorsNot yet answered
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
8 Jun 2026Jean Monnet Actions European funding of universities and promotion of the federalist project E-10-2026-002346Written questionwith 8 co-authors24 Jul 2026
28 Apr 2026War in the Strait of Hormuz: measures to shield European agriculture from rising fertiliser prices O-10-2026-000022Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
25 Mar 2026Bringing balance to the infringement procedures launched by the Commission concerning decisions to take opposition media off the air E-10-2026-001250Written questionwith 3 co-authors1 Jun 2026
25 Mar 2026Restoring genuine academic freedom in our universities E-10-2026-001262Written questionwith 27 co-authors22 May 2026
18 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation amending Annex III to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential B-10-2026-0178Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors—
26 Feb 2026Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
23 Feb 2026Agreement between the European Union and Australia: what are the consequences for the EU’s livestock sectors? E-10-2026-000737Written questionwith 8 co-authors24 Apr 2026
27 Jan 2026Access to mental health care in the outermost regions E-10-2026-000321Written questionwith 8 co-authors25 Mar 2026
23 Jan 2026British universities: UAE voices concern, Erasmus+ supports Islamism? E-10-2026-000268Written questionwith 21 co-authors20 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
15 Dec 2025Corruption scandals in the Office of the President of Ukraine and securing the Ukraine Facility E-10-2025-004956Written questionwith 13 co-authors9 Mar 2026
5 Dec 2025Pluralism made a mockery of, to the advantage of the left, as Radio France flouts EU requirements E-10-2025-004841Written questionwith 10 co-authors20 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025Manipulation of the Erasmus+ programme as a new channel for immigration and exclusion of Hungarian universities from the programme O-10-2025-000043Oral questionwith 59 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Nov 2025Providing financial and regulatory incentives for nuclear energy in the EU E-10-2025-004561Written questionwith 47 co-authors23 Mar 2026
4 Nov 2025Suspension of silicon metal production in Europe and safeguards for industries linked to critical raw materials E-10-2025-004312Written questionwith 16 co-authors23 Dec 2025
4 Nov 2025Chinese tariffs on EU agri-food products E-10-2025-004311Written questionwith 14 co-authors11 Feb 2026
4 Nov 2025Effects of new EU proposal on steel processing industry E-10-2025-004313Written questionwith 15 co-authors11 Feb 2026
31 Oct 2025Returns to Afghanistan: response to Member States’ call for an effective migration policy O-10-2025-000039Oral questionwith 44 co-authorsNot yet answered
29 Oct 2025Regulating the removal of content infringing copyright E-10-2025-004239Written questionwith 5 co-authors17 Dec 2025
25 Oct 2025Safety of European airports following several incidents involving African airlines E-10-2025-004211Written questionwith 9 co-authors5 Jan 2026
20 Oct 2025Horizon Europe and the Turkish car industry: risk of distortion of competition in breach of Article 173 TFEU E-10-2025-004125Written questionwith 12 co-authors22 Dec 2025
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 8 July 2025 supplementing Directive (EU) 2024/1788 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels B-10-2025-0464Motion for a resolutionwith 48 co-authors—
17 Oct 2025Freedom at risk: who controls the forces behind the European Media Freedom Act and who decides what information is monitored within the EU? E-10-2025-004102Written questionwith 22 co-authors16 Dec 2025
8 Oct 2025Reducing illegitimate censorship on digital platforms E-10-2025-003962Written questionwith 8 co-authors28 Nov 2025
1 Oct 2025Developing artificial intelligence for the protection of minors, under parental control E-10-2025-003837Written questionwith 4 co-authors12 Dec 2025
1 Oct 2025UN Special Rapporteur’s report recommending a global ban on all forms of surrogacy P-10-2025-003805Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors24 Oct 2025
17 Sept 2025Germany deporting migrants to France without agreement E-10-2025-003594Written questionwith 3 co-authors4 Feb 2026
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
10 Sept 2025Commission steamrolling ahead with Mercosur agreement O-10-2025-000027Oral questionwith 41 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Sept 2025Stopping the aberrations relating to the proposal for a regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse P-10-2025-003504Priority written questionwith 8 co-authors9 Dec 2025
9 Jul 2025Conditions placed on support to the new Syrian regime E-10-2025-002780Written questionwith 7 co-authors30 Oct 2025
8 Jul 2025‘No kids’ ideology, European population decline and an increasing reliance on immigration: is this the civilisational strategy we have adopted? E-10-2025-002762Written questionwith 14 co-authors10 Sept 2025
26 Jun 2025Potential electricity grid imbalance due to intermittent supply from renewables E-10-2025-002586Written questionwith 22 co-authors19 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025North Western Waters Advisory Council’s advice concerning the negative impact of offshore wind farms E-10-2025-002568Written questionwith 9 co-authors14 Aug 2025
24 Jun 2025Is the Commission funding the establishment of reception and support centres for unaccompanied foreign ‘minors’? E-10-2025-002539Written questionwith 5 co-authors15 Sept 2025
24 Jun 2025For digital independence from third countries E-10-2025-002537Written questionwith 7 co-authors7 Aug 2025
17 Jun 2025EU funding for ideologically oriented research projects E-10-2025-002432Written questionwith 6 co-authors13 Oct 2025
12 Jun 2025Financing of ‘The European Qur’an’ project E-10-2025-002376Written questionwith 12 co-authors20 Aug 2025
12 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on combating the establishment of transnational Islamist networks in Europe B-10-2025-0279Motion for a resolutionwith 60 co-authors—
10 Jun 2025‘Choose Europe for Science’ plan and intrusion of wokism at universities O-10-2025-000021Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
22 May 2025Sorbonne declaration: the EU prefers US researchers E-10-2025-002058Written questionwith 9 co-authors20 Aug 2025
21 May 2025Message encryption E-10-2025-002044Written questionwith 7 co-authors23 Jul 2025
21 May 2025Stopping the accumulation of regulations on digital services E-10-2025-002045Written questionwith 6 co-authors19 Aug 2025
5 May 2025Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging E-10-2025-001805Written questionwith 11 co-authors2 Jul 2025
17 Apr 2025Application of the rule of law conditionality mechanism – Institutional balance and respect for national competences E-10-2025-001578Written questionwith 18 co-authors2 Jul 2025
11 Apr 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on protecting multilingualism in the EU B-10-2025-0242Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
9 Apr 2025Foreign entities funding EU media E-10-2025-001452Written questionwith 5 co-authors2 Jun 2025
27 Mar 2025EUR 2.5 billion in financial aid earmarked by the EU for Syria E-10-2025-001300Written questionwith 39 co-authors20 Jun 2025
20 Mar 2025A cloud to call our own! E-10-2025-001198Written questionwith 11 co-authors13 Jun 2025
20 Mar 2025Decline of multilingualism: French in regression and the predominance of English E-10-2025-001199Written questionwith 15 co-authors30 Jun 2025
18 Mar 2025Condemnation of the Commission’s biased report on combating anti-Muslim hatred E-10-2025-001138Written questionwith 13 co-authors18 Jun 2025
13 Mar 2025Is the Commission abandoning the objectives of the Farm to Fork Strategy? P-10-2025-001086Priority written questionwith 11 co-authors5 May 2025
20 Feb 2025EU-Mercosur: EUR 1.8 billion – genuine support or leverage for negotiation? E-10-2025-000776Written questionwith 21 co-authors2 May 2025
20 Feb 2025Measures taken by the European Ports Alliance since its establishment last year E-10-2025-000801Written questionwith 8 co-authors18 Jul 2025
18 Feb 2025Recognition of organic sugar produced in Guadeloupe E-10-2025-000732Written questionwith 12 co-authors2 Apr 2025
12 Feb 2025European standards undermining the competitiveness of the European automotive industry E-10-2025-000657Written questionwith 2 co-authors28 Apr 2025
7 Feb 2025Cost of censorship on social media E-10-2025-000567Written questionwith 27 co-authors10 Apr 2025
3 Feb 2025The principle of technological neutrality following the publication of the second mission letter for the Commissioner for Energy and Housing P-10-2025-000453Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors21 Mar 2025
3 Feb 2025Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: proportionality, feasibility and health impacts of re-use obligations E-10-2025-000460Written questionwith 10 co-authors22 May 2025
30 Jan 2025Legitimacy of the European Democracy Shield E-10-2025-000447Written questionwith 36 co-authors31 Mar 2025
30 Jan 2025Statements by former Commissioner Thierry Breton on the upcoming parliamentary elections in Germany: a threat to democracy E-10-2025-000414Written questionwith 31 co-authors15 Apr 2025
27 Jan 2025Former Commissioner Thierry Breton’s new lobbying activities for Bank of America E-10-2025-000358Written questionwith 29 co-authors3 Apr 2025
24 Jan 2025Use of public funds for environmental lobbying P-10-2025-000317Priority written questionwith 18 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Dec 2024Brazilian authorities’ proven inability to prevent hormone-treated meat from entering the EU market P-10-2024-003045Priority written questionwith 11 co-authors27 Mar 2025
2 Dec 2024Support for professions affected by the 2035 expiry date for combustion engines E-10-2024-002715Written questionwith 2 co-authors24 Feb 2025
27 Nov 2024Safeguarding the EU’s cognac and brandy sectors in the face of the Chinese tariff threat E-10-2024-002692Written questionwith 7 co-authors11 Feb 2025
26 Nov 2024Support for the European automotive industry affected by the requirement to go fully electric E-10-2024-002664Written questionwith 10 co-authors21 Jan 2025
22 Nov 2024Consequences of the digital euro for financial stability and individual freedoms E-10-2024-002634Written questionwith 3 co-authors10 Feb 2025
19 Nov 2024Grants paid to suspended Eramet Group project E-10-2024-002578Written questionwith 9 co-authors31 Jan 2025
19 Nov 2024State of the automotive industry in Europe E-10-2024-002579Written questionwith 8 co-authors12 May 2025
14 Nov 2024EU-Canada agreement on Horizon Europe: reciprocity and safeguarding strategic interests E-10-2024-002535Written questionwith 13 co-authors12 Feb 2025
13 Nov 2024Respect for and protection of Serbian Orthodox religious sites and the Serbian minority in Kosovo in connection with the provision of EU funding E-10-2024-002519Written questionwith 4 co-authors18 Mar 2025
4 Nov 2024Scrutinising the declarations of interests made by Commissioners-designate E-10-2024-002391Written questionwith 26 co-authors8 Apr 2025
28 Oct 2024Recognition of nuclear-derived hydrogen as ‘low carbon’ E-10-2024-002277Written questionwith 9 co-authors17 Mar 2025
28 Oct 2024Challenges and prospects for European space policy financing, institutional cooperation and harmonisation of standards in a strategic sector E-10-2024-002284Written questionwith 10 co-authors12 Feb 2025
21 Oct 2024Use of the word ‘steak’ for plant-based products E-10-2024-002191Written questionwith 5 co-authors17 Mar 2025
18 Oct 2024Spanish Government measures’ compatibility with press freedom defended by the EU E-10-2024-002172Written questionwith 20 co-authors30 Nov 2024
17 Oct 2024Repeated failure to integrate migrants into European societies E-10-2024-002132Written questionwith 13 co-authors16 Apr 2025
26 Sept 2024Regularisation of illegal migrants in Spain and consequences for the EU E-10-2024-001829Written questionwith 14 co-authors6 Jan 2025
24 Sept 2024Implications of the abolition of sugar quotas E-10-2024-001797Written questionwith 16 co-authors5 Nov 2024
23 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the surge in the number of sub-Saharan migrants B-10-2024-0065Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
13 Sept 2024Consequences of suspension clauses for the survival of Air Austral E-10-2024-001703Written questionwith 12 co-authors20 Nov 2024
9 Sept 2024Pro-Hamas NGO funded by the EU P-10-2024-001656Priority written questionwith 16 co-authors28 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 66

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI40
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI36
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI38
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI30
29 Jun 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) JURI-AM-790236 JURI11
25 Jun 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1753 as regards amendments adopted by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union on 14 July 2025 to the Common Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications JURI-AM-790209 JURI13
19 May 2026Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693 CJ03-AM-788926 CJ0343
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787835 CJ0536
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787836 CJ0518
24 Apr 2026Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837 CJ0549

Show all 66 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pascale PIERA”. Member record. memberId 256877. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256877. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256877?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256877,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Pascale PIERA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256877?docs=all&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256877. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256877. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}