Member

Sophie WILMÈS

Renew · Belgium

Group: Renew
Country: Belgium
Roll-call participation: 94.2 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 96.1 %ⓘ of 486 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 96.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: MR Mouvement Réformateur
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 13 of 477 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 220801

National party: MR Mouvement Réformateur
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 13 of 477 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 220801

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

94.2 %

486 of 516 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 96.3 % (−2.1 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.1 %

467 of 486 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 96.1 % (±0.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.7 %

13 of 477 votes where their group had a clear line

9 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 486 votes cast

Participation 94.2 % — Renew median 96.3 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sophie WILMÈS	94.2 %
Renew median	96.3 %
Lowest in the group	38.0 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	77

With majority line 96.1 % — Renew median 96.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sophie WILMÈS	96.1 %
Renew median	96.1 %
Lowest in the group	77.6 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	77

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	22
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	0
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	90
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	9
23 Oct 2024	129	128
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	0
26 Nov 2024	18	0
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	12
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	98 % of 3 843 shared	92 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	98 % of 3 700 shared	92 %
Select Pina PICIERNO	Pina PICIERNO changed group	Renew	Italy	96 % of 292 shared	92 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	95 % of 4 097 shared	92 %
Select Taner KABILOV	Taner KABILOV changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	95 % of 458 shared	92 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	95 % of 3 567 shared	92 %
Select Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Renew	Finland	95 % of 3 803 shared	92 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	94 % of 3 262 shared	92 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	94 % of 4 093 shared	92 %
Select Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER	Renew	Austria	94 % of 3 585 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	90 % of 2 786 shared	86 %
Select Willemien KONING	Willemien KONING	EPP	Netherlands	89 % of 1 562 shared	82 %
Select Liesbet SOMMEN	Liesbet SOMMEN	EPP	Belgium	89 % of 3 949 shared	82 %
Select Georgia TRAMACERE	Georgia TRAMACERE	S&D	Italy	89 % of 1 531 shared	86 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	88 % of 3 694 shared	86 %
Select Jens GEIER	Jens GEIER	S&D	Germany	88 % of 3 336 shared	86 %
Select André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES	S&D	Portugal	88 % of 3 423 shared	86 %
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	88 % of 2 539 shared	86 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	88 % of 3 924 shared	86 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	88 % of 3 978 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Vice-chair	30 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	8 Jul 2026
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	29 Sept 2024

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
New Europol Regulation	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	17 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	LIBE	14 Sept 2026
EU Emissions Trading System and market stability reserve: competitiveness and cost-effective decarbonisation	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	14 Sept 2026
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol amending the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism	Rapporteur	LIBE	4 Sept 2026
92nd EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue, 25-26 August 2026, San Francisco (USA)	Official delegation	D-US	19 Aug 2026
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	D-US	14 Jul 2026
Monitoring and controlling drug precursors and repealing Regulations (EC) No 273/2004 and (EC) No 111/2005	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	10 Apr 2026
On the adoption of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, on the multiannual technical guidelines for this programme, on the multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, and repealing Decisions 2003/77/EC and 2008/376/EC	Shadow rapporteur · 2 declarations	ITRE	10 Apr 2026
TLD MISSION 18/03 - 20/03 2026	Official delegation	D-US	4 Mar 2026
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	D-US	4 Mar 2026

Show all 25 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

178 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 156 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries (B10-0385/2026) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (B10-0406/2026, B10-0408/2026, B10-0410/2026, B10-0411/2026, B10-0412/2026, B10-0413/2026, B10-0414/2026)	Speech · 25 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (B10-0390/2026) (vote)	Speech · 4 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (B10-0386/2026, B10-0387/2026, B10-0388/2026, B10-0389/2026) (vote)	Speech · 5 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security (A10-0205/2026 - Paulo do Nascimento Cabral) (vote)	Speech	Read
17 Sept 2026	Impact of social media and the online environment on young people (A10-0220/2026 - Sandro Ruotolo) (vote)	Speech	Read
17 Sept 2026	An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector (A10-0168/2026 - Loucas Fourlas, Ruggero Razza) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya (RC-B10-0404/2026, B10-0404/2026, B10-0416/2026, B10-0417/2026, B10-0418/2026, B10-0420/2026) (vote)	Speech	Read
17 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro (RC-B10-0394/2026, B10-0394/2026, B10-0396/2026, B10-0400/2026, B10-0402/2026, B10-0403/2026, B10-0409/2026, B10-0419/2026) (vote)	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Sept 2026	Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung (RC-B10-0398/2026, B10-0398/2026, B10-0399/2026, B10-0401/2026, B10-0405/2026, B10-0407/2026) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 47

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
25 Aug 2026	Pre-frontier intelligence in EU border management E-10-2026-003331	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	Not yet answered
15 Jul 2026	Illegal drug websites are making a comeback via foreign domain names E-10-2026-002965	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	16 Sept 2026
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Jul 2026	Impact of Court ruling on Hungarian anti-LGBTI propaganda law on similar law in Bulgaria E-10-2026-002806	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
11 Jun 2026	Small modular reactors E-10-2026-002408	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	20 Aug 2026
28 May 2026	Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-002171	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	19 Aug 2026
13 May 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response B-10-2026-0245	Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors	—
27 Apr 2026	Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia E-10-2026-001705	Written questionwith 49 co-authors	14 Jul 2026
30 Mar 2026	Deeply concerning events in Hungary E-10-2026-001318	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	5 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026	Potential Russian interference in the 2026 Hungarian national elections P-10-2026-001155	Priority written questionwith 2 co-authors	17 Jun 2026

Show all 47 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 142

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790968	CJ72	6
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791883	CJ72	9
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791071	CJ72	6
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-786820	CJ72	1
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072	CJ72	7
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967	CJ72	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790932	CJ53	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790005	CJ53	3
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933	CJ53	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	12

Show all 142 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Belgium National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220801?period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sophie WILMÈS”. Member record. memberId 220801. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220801?period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/220801. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/220801?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-220801,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sophie WILMÈS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220801?period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/220801?period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 220801. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/220801. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 47

Amendments tabled in committee, 142

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928