Member

André ROUGÉ

Patriots · France

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 98.4 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 92.8 %ⓘ of 502 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 77.2 %

More facts (5)

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 0 of 385 votesⓘ
Committees: REGI
Member id: 197690

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 0 of 385 votesⓘ
Committees: REGI
Member id: 197690

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.4 %

508 of 516 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (+5.1 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.8 %

466 of 502 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 77.2 % (+15.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 385 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

13.0 %

66 of 508 votes cast

Participation 98.4 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 86 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
André ROUGÉ	98.4 %
Patriots median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	23.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	86

With majority line 92.8 % — Patriots median 77.2 %, 86 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 86 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
André ROUGÉ	92.8 %
Patriots median	77.2 %
Lowest in the group	67.3 %
Highest in the group	95.1 %
Members	86

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	23
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	0
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	127
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	17
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	56
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	43

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 731 shared	74 %
Select Julien LEONARDELLI	Julien LEONARDELLI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 356 shared	74 %
Select Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 227 shared	74 %
Select Séverine WERBROUCK	Séverine WERBROUCK	Patriots	France	100 % of 4 922 shared	74 %
Select Gilles PENNELLE	Gilles PENNELLE	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 606 shared	74 %
Select Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 191 shared	74 %
Select Marie DAUCHY	Marie DAUCHY	Patriots	France	100 % of 4 360 shared	74 %
Select Valérie DELOGE	Valérie DELOGE	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 596 shared	74 %
Select Fabrice LEGGERI	Fabrice LEGGERI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 380 shared	74 %
Select Julien SANCHEZ	Julien SANCHEZ	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 408 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	78 % of 4 286 shared	70 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	77 % of 4 950 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	76 % of 5 494 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	75 % of 5 167 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	75 % of 4 903 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	73 % of 4 740 shared	51 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	70 % of 4 400 shared	69 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	70 % of 5 230 shared	70 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	70 % of 2 207 shared	68 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	70 % of 5 106 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland and Norway and to the EU-Iceland Joint Parliamentary Committee and the European Economic Area (EEA) Joint Parliamentary CommitteeDEEA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE Delegation	Substitute	12 Dec 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working group	Member	20 Feb 2025	now
Committee on FisheriesPECH Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	11 Dec 2024

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Strengthening cohesion policy for the EU’s islands and coastal regions	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	15 Sept 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as regards the school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme (‘EU school scheme’), sectoral interventions, the creation of a protein sector, requirements for hemp, the possibility for marketing standards for cheese, protein crops and meat, application of additional import duties, rules on the availability of supplies in time of emergencies and severe crisis and securities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	24 Feb 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	23 Feb 2026
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034	Opinion rapporteur	REGI	2 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	8 Jan 2026

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

31 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 49 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2026	Need for an adaptation of the EU legal framework on sustainable biofuels (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Mar 2026	European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Violence in the Great Lakes Region, particularly in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Dec 2025	30th anniversary of the signing of the Dayton-Paris Peace Agreement (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	Fishing opportunities 2026: ensuring the sustainability of fish populations, marine ecosystems and coastal communities	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Criminal intimidation against investigative journalists in the EU: the attempted attack on Sigfrido Ranucci (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 31 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 117

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Sept 2026	European seed sovereignty E-10-2026-003723	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
9 Sept 2026	The 28th regime/EU Inc.: can the Commission guarantee the soundness of its legal basis? P-10-2026-003589	Priority written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Financing alternatives to Canadair E-10-2026-003520	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
2 Sept 2026	Adhering to the timeline for the European Disability Card E-10-2026-003450	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Aug 2026	Putting an end to AdBlue-related fire engine breakdowns E-10-2026-003245	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	Not yet answered
5 Aug 2026	Coherence of EU policies on nature restoration, vineyard restructuring and forest fire prevention E-10-2026-003209	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
4 Aug 2026	Effectiveness of rescEU and availability of resources to tackle ongoing fires in France P-10-2026-003198	Priority written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
23 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the spread of Sargassum and its impact on the outermost regions, notably Guadeloupe and Martinique B-10-2026-0372	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
20 Jul 2026	Difficulties in interpreting Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 resulting from the concept of ‘week’ E-10-2026-003059	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
17 Jul 2026	Reshoring of the flax sector: industrial and strategic challenges for the EU E-10-2026-003046	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	3 Sept 2026

Show all 117 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872	REGI	23
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875	REGI	21
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790092	CJ71	13
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093	CJ71	11
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	7
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790097	CJ71	6
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099	CJ71	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100	CJ71	3
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	3

Show all 41 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197690?period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “André ROUGÉ”. Member record. memberId 197690. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197690?period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197690. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197690?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197690,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{André ROUGÉ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197690?period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197690?period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197690. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197690. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 117

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928