Skip to content

Member

Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
90.9 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line
92.3 %ⓘ of 466 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.2 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
17 of 394 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, LIBE (substitute)
Member id
197501
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates

Roll-call participation ⓘ

90.9 %

469 of 516 roll calls while in office

ECR median: 92.2 % (−1.3 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.3 %

430 of 466 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.2 % (+5.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.3 %

17 of 394 votes where their group had a clear line

5 opposite (for ↔ against), 12 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

9.4 %

44 of 469 votes cast

Participation 90.9 % — ECR median 92.2 %, 78 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 78 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI90.9 %
ECR median92.2 %
Lowest in the group10.5 %
Highest in the group100.0 %
Members78
With majority line 92.3 % — ECR median 87.2 %, 78 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 78 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI92.3 %
ECR median87.2 %
Lowest in the group61.8 %
Highest in the group97.6 %
Members78
  • 2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 49 against, 168 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 72 for, 522 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 473 for, 114 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Final votePassed 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 395 to recital 19 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 Sept 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PPE 384 for, 10 against, 51 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 523 for, 75 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 157 for, 428 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 95 for, 420 against, 119 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Paragraph 13 — part 2 483 for, 84 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 80 for, 407 against, 151 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 79 for, 531 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 47 for, 560 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 88 for, 520 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 63 for, 552 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 123 for, 390 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 494 for, 83 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 2, adding text after recital S 217 for, 409 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 226 for, 409 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 34 — part 2 566 for, 60 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 32 — part 1 588 for, 56 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242323
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202410
9 Oct 2024180
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129129
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202420
14 Nov 20243635
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241312
18 Dec 20243332
19 Dec 20244543

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland98 % of 5 484 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland98 % of 5 014 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland97 % of 5 426 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland97 % of 5 504 shared81 %
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland97 % of 4 727 shared81 %
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 487 shared81 %
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland97 % of 4 554 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland97 % of 5 457 shared81 %
Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 363 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 5 294 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain74 % of 4 904 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 263 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 167 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain73 % of 5 499 shared68 %
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS No groupRomania73 % of 4 572 shared48 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 5 038 shared67 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 193 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 105 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia72 % of 4 548 shared62 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember19 Jul 20246 Oct 2024

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Show all 20 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

55 contributions recorded, 26 written statements; 6 on behalf of their group; 52 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
15 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate) StatementRead
8 Jul 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate) StatementRead
16 Jun 2026Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) (debate) StatementRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Situation in Lebanon: implementation of the ceasefire, support peace efforts and humanitarian access (debate) StatementRead
25 Mar 2026Combating corruption (debate) StatementRead
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate) StatementRead
11 Feb 2026Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) StatementRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 98

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0411Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the Escalating Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Human Rights Situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0363Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
17 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0329Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0327Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0317Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—

Show all 98 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 26 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 28f1e27dd5a5 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
3 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI”. Member record. memberId 197501. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=77&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 3 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197501?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 28f1e27dd5a5 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197501,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=77&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197501?page=77&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-03},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197501. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197501. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 28f1e27dd5a5 (3 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}