Member

Magdalena ADAMOWICZ

EPP · Poland

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 96.9 %ⓘ of 516 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.4 % · 2024 (from july), roll calls
With majority line: 92.4 %ⓘ of 500 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 11 of 459 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI (substitute), LIBE, PECH (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 197490

National party: Independent
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 11 of 459 votesⓘ
Committees: JURI (substitute), LIBE, PECH (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 197490

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.9 %

500 of 516 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 90.7 % (+6.2 pts)

Chamber median: 93.4 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.4 %

462 of 500 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.3 % (−0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.4 %

11 of 459 votes where their group had a clear line

10 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.8 %

9 of 500 votes cast

Participation 96.9 % — EPP median 90.7 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	96.9 %
EPP median	90.7 %
Lowest in the group	22.1 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	190

With majority line 92.4 % — EPP median 93.3 %, 190 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 190 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Magdalena ADAMOWICZ	92.4 %
EPP median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	61.4 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	190

2024 (from July), 516 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5	343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5	338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5	201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5	200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4	437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4	124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4	427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4	267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3	194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3	136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3	92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2	203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2	524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1	596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1	427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1	111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2	435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2	344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1	378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22	186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5	207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2	512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1	602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2	347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1	381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1	181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2	344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1	213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G	141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22	452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20	480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3	582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2	275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1	490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12	475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4	478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3	489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2	479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3	474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2	499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 22 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	20
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	126
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	36	34
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	56
17 Dec 2024	13	12
18 Dec 2024	33	29
19 Dec 2024	45	45

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 501 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej BUŁA	Andrzej BUŁA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 040 shared	89 %
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 106 shared	89 %
Select Mirosława NYKIEL	Mirosława NYKIEL	EPP	Poland	97 % of 4 928 shared	89 %
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	EPP	Poland	97 % of 5 171 shared	89 %
Select Andrzej HALICKI	Andrzej HALICKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 113 shared	89 %
Select Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 107 shared	89 %
Select Dariusz JOŃSKI	Dariusz JOŃSKI	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 413 shared	89 %
Select Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 253 shared	89 %
Select Łukasz KOHUT	Łukasz KOHUT	EPP	Poland	96 % of 5 350 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 964 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	84 % of 4 830 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 3 763 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 5 338 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	83 % of 3 937 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 317 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	83 % of 4 193 shared	82 %
Select Nathalie LOISEAU	Nathalie LOISEAU	Renew	France	83 % of 4 456 shared	82 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	82 % of 5 135 shared	82 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	82 % of 4 090 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on FisheriesPECH Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	1 Apr 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working group	Member	5 Feb 2025	now

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Cloud and AI Development Act	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	LIBE	25 Sept 2026
23rd EU-Kazakhstan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (PCC) in Astana and Aktau	Official delegation	DCAS	25 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	PECH	28 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	JURI	20 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	PECH	29 Sept 2025
No dossier named	Rapporteur	JURI	7 Jul 2025
ENVI delegation to IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee meeting (MEPC), London, UK - 7-9 April 2025	Official delegation		19 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation		10 Feb 2025
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	TRAN	19 Dec 2024
kodyfikacje i ujednolicenia	Rapporteur	JURI	2 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded, 3 written statements; 36 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Statement	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2026	Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Presentation of the action plan against cyberbullying (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Air passenger rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 33 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 42

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
10 Sept 2026	Absence of an enhanced safeguard mechanism for fishery and aquaculture products under the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement E-10-2026-003616	Written question	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Implementation of Regulation (EU) 2026/687 since the start of the provisional application of the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement E-10-2026-003615	Written question	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Sept 2026	Fulfilment of the Commission’s commitments on import controls made alongside the EU-Mercosur Safeguard Regulation E-10-2026-003617	Written question	Not yet answered
2 Sept 2026	GNSS signal interference and spoofing in the Baltic Sea Region E-10-2026-003449	Written question	Not yet answered
21 Jul 2026	Implementation of the recommendations of the Commission’s Special Panel on children in the digital world E-10-2026-003064	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
13 Jul 2026	Missing and runaway children as an indicator of violence, abuse and grooming E-10-2026-002868	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered

Show all 42 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	29
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	5
16 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections PECH-AM-791014	PECH	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099	CJ71	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790104	CJ71	2
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087	CJ46	30
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789892	CJ46	23
18 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789893	CJ46	3
27 Apr 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787838	CJ05	1

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?page=2&period=2024&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Magdalena ADAMOWICZ”. Member record. memberId 197490. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?page=2&period=2024&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197490. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197490?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197490,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Magdalena ADAMOWICZ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?page=2&period=2024&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197490?page=2&period=2024&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197490. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197490. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 42

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928