Group

EPP

European People’s Party

Seats: 184 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.91ⓘ over 620 final votes
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.89ⓘ over 5 922 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side: 565 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: European People’s Party
Code: PPE
Alignment: Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
Founded: 1953 (as Christian Democratic Group)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 36 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: European People’s Party
Code: PPE
Alignment: Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism
Founded: 1953 (as Christian Democratic Group)
Closest line: Renew — 97 % of 553 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 36 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

EPP: 0.91 over the whole period (620 votes), 0.86 in Q4 2024 and 0.89 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	EPP	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	ECR	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.8657 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8357 votes	0.7457 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.9230 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9130 votes	0.7330 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.9384 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9584 votes	0.7184 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.9458 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.8258 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.88121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.78121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.9189 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.9489 votes	0.8689 votes	0.7589 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.94100 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.9599 votes	0.92100 votes	0.76100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.8972 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8672 votes	0.7572 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.91	0.77	0.93	0.94	0.89	0.76	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	620	618	619	619	619	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.88
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.91
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.75
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.91
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.86
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.67
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.95
International TradeINTA	203	0.93
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.97
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.84
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.91
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.95
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.95
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.80
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.94
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.79
FisheriesPECH	65	0.83
PetitionsPETI	61	0.92
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.92
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.79
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.94
Public HealthSANT	23	0.85
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.89
Economy & single market	1 257	0.93
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.91
Defence & security	703	0.93
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.89
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.76
Climate & environment	519	0.83
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.80
Digital, AI & data	297	0.94
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.89
Trade & customs	269	0.92
Health	260	0.74
Migration & asylum	122	0.90
Energy	92	0.90
Transport & tourism	84	0.87

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
Renew	97 %	553
S&D	91 %	571
Greens	81 %	557
ECR	78 %	472
The Left	53 %	468
Patriots	50 %	449
ESN	26 %	555

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 190

Members whose group is EPP now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of EPP
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Emil RADEV	Emil RADEV	Bulgaria	86.1 % of 2 521	−4.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.3 % of 2 171	−1.4 pts median 93.7 %	6.2 % of 2 086	3.8 % of 2 171
Select Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS	Greece	93.7 % of 2 521	+2.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.9 % of 2 362	+1.2 pts median 93.7 %	3.8 % of 2 283	1.4 % of 2 362
Select Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS	Spain	81.1 % of 2 521	−9.9 pts median 91.0 %	94.4 % of 2 044	+0.7 pts median 93.7 %	4.0 % of 1 973	2.3 % of 2 044
Select Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA	Spain	58.2 % of 2 521	−32.8 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 1 467	+1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.5 % of 1 418	2.0 % of 1 467
Select Eszter LAKOS	Eszter LAKOS	Hungary	55.6 % of 2 521	−35.4 pts median 91.0 %	89.9 % of 1 401	−3.9 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 1 340	5.9 % of 1 401
Select Eva MAYDELL	Eva MAYDELL	Bulgaria	18.2 % of 2 521	−72.8 pts median 91.0 %	92.2 % of 459	−1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.5 % of 432	3.9 % of 459
Select Ewa KOPACZ	Ewa KOPACZ	Poland	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	92.8 % of 2 467	−0.9 pts median 93.7 %	5.3 % of 2 364	1.6 % of 2 467
Select Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS	Spain	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.8 % of 2 492	+0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.2 % of 2 391	3.0 % of 2 492
Select Flavio TOSI	Flavio TOSI	Italy	94.6 % of 2 521	+3.6 pts median 91.0 %	94.0 % of 2 386	+0.2 pts median 93.7 %	4.7 % of 2 295	2.1 % of 2 386
Select Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Francisco José MILLÁN MON	Spain	98.3 % of 2 521	+7.3 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 477	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	4.3 % of 2 374	2.9 % of 2 477
Select François-Xavier BELLAMY	François-Xavier BELLAMY	France	86.4 % of 2 521	−4.6 pts median 91.0 %	80.9 % of 2 178	−12.8 pts median 93.7 %	17.6 % of 2 105	4.9 % of 2 178
Select Fredis BELERIS	Fredis BELERIS	Greece	84.3 % of 2 521	−6.7 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 124	−0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 2 042	2.5 % of 2 124
Select Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	Italy	39.9 % of 2 521	−51.1 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 1 007	+2.5 pts median 93.7 %	2.4 % of 983	0.7 % of 1 007
Select Gabriel MATO	Gabriel MATO	Spain	88.0 % of 2 521	−3.0 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 219	−0.2 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 2 131	2.9 % of 2 219
Select Gabriella GERZSENYI	Gabriella GERZSENYI	Hungary	24.5 % of 2 521	−66.5 pts median 91.0 %	87.1 % of 618	−6.7 pts median 93.7 %	10.6 % of 592	6.6 % of 618
Select Georgios AFTIAS	Georgios AFTIAS	Greece	82.7 % of 2 521	−8.3 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 086	+0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.1 % of 2 008	2.8 % of 2 086
Select Gheorghe FALCĂ	Gheorghe FALCĂ	Romania	86.4 % of 2 521	−4.6 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 177	+4.0 pts median 93.7 %	1.3 % of 2 117	0.9 % of 2 177
Select Giusi PRINCI	Giusi PRINCI	Italy	99.0 % of 2 521	+8.1 pts median 91.0 %	95.4 % of 2 497	+1.6 pts median 93.7 %	3.3 % of 2 395	1.7 % of 2 497
Select Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ	Poland	73.0 % of 2 521	−18.0 pts median 91.0 %	91.6 % of 1 840	−2.1 pts median 93.7 %	6.3 % of 1 769	3.8 % of 1 840
Select Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Hélder SOUSA SILVA	Portugal	96.7 % of 2 521	+5.7 pts median 91.0 %	94.1 % of 2 438	+0.3 pts median 93.7 %	4.2 % of 2 335	3.7 % of 2 438
Select Henrik DAHL	Henrik DAHL	Denmark	99.5 % of 2 521	+8.5 pts median 91.0 %	81.8 % of 2 509	−11.9 pts median 93.7 %	17.3 % of 2 407	2.7 % of 2 509
Select Herbert DORFMANN	Herbert DORFMANN	Italy	99.7 % of 2 521	+8.7 pts median 91.0 %	96.6 % of 2 513	+2.9 pts median 93.7 %	2.7 % of 2 409	1.0 % of 2 513
Select Hildegard BENTELE	Hildegard BENTELE	Germany	90.0 % of 2 521	−1.0 pts median 91.0 %	98.3 % of 2 269	+4.6 pts median 93.7 %	1.1 % of 2 184	0.8 % of 2 269
Select Ilia LAZAROV	Ilia LAZAROV	Bulgaria	75.6 % of 2 521	−15.4 pts median 91.0 %	87.2 % of 1 905	−6.5 pts median 93.7 %	11.2 % of 1 815	3.9 % of 1 905
Select Inese VAIDERE	Inese VAIDERE	Latvia	93.1 % of 2 521	+2.1 pts median 91.0 %	97.7 % of 2 346	+4.0 pts median 93.7 %	0.8 % of 2 242	0.9 % of 2 346
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	Netherlands	99.4 % of 2 521	+8.4 pts median 91.0 %	96.2 % of 2 507	+2.5 pts median 93.7 %	2.5 % of 2 403	1.6 % of 2 507
Select Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN	Romania	80.0 % of 2 521	−11.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.2 % of 2 017	+3.5 pts median 93.7 %	1.8 % of 1 934	1.4 % of 2 017
Select Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA	Spain	98.8 % of 2 521	+7.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.2 % of 2 492	−0.5 pts median 93.7 %	4.8 % of 2 392	2.7 % of 2 492
Select Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Luxembourg	96.1 % of 2 521	+5.1 pts median 91.0 %	95.7 % of 2 422	+2.0 pts median 93.7 %	2.5 % of 2 322	2.0 % of 2 422
Select Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	Isabelle LE CALLENNEC	France	93.0 % of 2 521	+2.0 pts median 91.0 %	77.7 % of 2 345	−16.0 pts median 93.7 %	20.2 % of 2 243	12.1 % of 2 345
Select Iuliu WINKLER	Iuliu WINKLER	Romania	93.9 % of 2 521	+2.9 pts median 91.0 %	96.9 % of 2 366	+3.2 pts median 93.7 %	2.1 % of 2 276	1.7 % of 2 366
Select Jacek PROTAS	Jacek PROTAS	Poland	95.8 % of 2 521	+4.8 pts median 91.0 %	91.5 % of 2 414	−2.2 pts median 93.7 %	5.9 % of 2 317	3.3 % of 2 414
Select Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK	Poland	97.1 % of 2 521	+6.1 pts median 91.0 %	91.7 % of 2 448	−2.0 pts median 93.7 %	6.1 % of 2 347	1.3 % of 2 448
Select Jan FARSKÝ	Jan FARSKÝ	Czechia	97.9 % of 2 521	+6.9 pts median 91.0 %	90.6 % of 2 467	−3.1 pts median 93.7 %	8.7 % of 2 380	3.9 % of 2 467
Select Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Janusz LEWANDOWSKI	Poland	75.8 % of 2 521	−15.2 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 1 911	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	3.9 % of 1 855	4.5 % of 1 911
Select Javier ZARZALEJOS	Javier ZARZALEJOS	Spain	95.4 % of 2 521	+4.4 pts median 91.0 %	93.7 % of 2 404	±0.0 pts median 93.7 %	4.4 % of 2 323	2.4 % of 2 404
Select Jens GIESEKE	Jens GIESEKE	Germany	99.3 % of 2 521	+8.3 pts median 91.0 %	96.6 % of 2 503	+2.9 pts median 93.7 %	2.1 % of 2 399	1.9 % of 2 503
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	Netherlands	99.8 % of 2 521	+8.8 pts median 91.0 %	96.7 % of 2 515	+3.0 pts median 93.7 %	2.0 % of 2 412	1.7 % of 2 515
Select Jessica POLFJÄRD	Jessica POLFJÄRD	Sweden	96.9 % of 2 521	+5.9 pts median 91.0 %	91.0 % of 2 443	−2.7 pts median 93.7 %	7.8 % of 2 340	1.4 % of 2 443
Select Jörgen WARBORN	Jörgen WARBORN	Sweden	90.7 % of 2 521	−0.3 pts median 91.0 %	90.6 % of 2 287	−3.2 pts median 93.7 %	8.2 % of 2 184	1.6 % of 2 287
Select Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ	Spain	96.2 % of 2 521	+5.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.7 % of 2 424	−1.0 pts median 93.7 %	5.0 % of 2 321	3.3 % of 2 424
Select Jüri RATAS	Jüri RATAS	Estonia	98.0 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	97.3 % of 2 470	+3.6 pts median 93.7 %	1.4 % of 2 367	1.1 % of 2 470
Select Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ	Poland	98.0 % of 2 521	+7.0 pts median 91.0 %	92.0 % of 2 471	−1.7 pts median 93.7 %	5.8 % of 2 369	1.7 % of 2 471
Select Karlo RESSLER	Karlo RESSLER	Croatia	84.7 % of 2 521	−6.3 pts median 91.0 %	92.9 % of 2 135	−0.8 pts median 93.7 %	6.0 % of 2 058	2.6 % of 2 135
Select Kinga KOLLÁR	Kinga KOLLÁR	Hungary	52.9 % of 2 521	−38.1 pts median 91.0 %	88.4 % of 1 333	−5.3 pts median 93.7 %	9.0 % of 1 275	6.5 % of 1 333
Select Krzysztof BREJZA	Krzysztof BREJZA	Poland	99.2 % of 2 521	+8.2 pts median 91.0 %	92.7 % of 2 501	−1.0 pts median 93.7 %	5.0 % of 2 399	1.6 % of 2 501
Select Krzysztof HETMAN	Krzysztof HETMAN	Poland	97.4 % of 2 521	+6.4 pts median 91.0 %	91.0 % of 2 456	−2.7 pts median 93.7 %	6.2 % of 2 353	4.5 % of 2 456
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	Germany	81.9 % of 2 521	−9.1 pts median 91.0 %	98.6 % of 2 064	+4.9 pts median 93.7 %	0.5 % of 1 977	0.9 % of 2 064
Select Letizia MORATTI	Letizia MORATTI	Italy	81.1 % of 2 521	−9.9 pts median 91.0 %	93.6 % of 2 045	−0.1 pts median 93.7 %	4.6 % of 1 968	2.0 % of 2 045
Select Lídia PEREIRA	Lídia PEREIRA	Portugal	93.3 % of 2 521	+2.3 pts median 91.0 %	94.7 % of 2 353	+1.0 pts median 93.7 %	3.6 % of 2 254	3.9 % of 2 353

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Germany	31	CDU 23 · CSU 6 · Familien-Partei DE 1 · ÖDP 1
Poland	23	KO 18 · PSL 2 · No party 3
Spain	22	PP 22
Romania	10	PNL 8 · UDMR 2
Italy	9	FI 8 · SVP 1
Greece	7	N.D. 7
Hungary	7	TISZA 7
Portugal	7	PSD 4 · AD 2 · CDS-PP 1
Bulgaria	6	GERB 4 · DSB 1 · SDS 1
Croatia	6	HDZ 6

Show all 27 delegations

Line on the final votes, 43

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
16 Sept 2026	Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 48 for, 95 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstained
16 Sept 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 69 for, 74 against, 12 abstained	Adopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 53 for, 104 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 62 for, 112 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 64 for, 109 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstained
16 Jun 2026	Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 104 for, 32 against, 21 abstained	Adopted 344 for, 237 against, 66 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 50 for, 87 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstained
29 Apr 2026	Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 86 for, 12 against, 55 abstained	Adopted 328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 84 for, 39 against, 21 abstained	Adopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton T304-40 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 100 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 57 for, 106 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2) Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 109 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
11 Feb 2026	Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 54 for, 111 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained
10 Feb 2026	Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 107 for, 62 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstained
17 Dec 2025	European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ Final vote — text as a whole (B10-0558/2025)	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 71 for, 68 against, 28 abstained	Adopted 358 for, 202 against, 79 abstained
16 Dec 2025	Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 109 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 455 for, 169 against, 8 abstained
16 Dec 2025	Genetically modified maize NK603 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 58 for, 114 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 479 for, 173 against, 8 abstained
26 Nov 2025	Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 65 for, 67 against, 38 abstained	Rejected 359 for, 188 against, 76 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified maize MON 87427 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 53 for, 105 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 426 for, 157 against, 17 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified soybean MON 87708 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 54 for, 115 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 453 for, 179 against, 14 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 53 for, 112 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 456 for, 166 against, 21 abstained
25 Nov 2025	Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 111 for, 46 against, 10 abstained	Adopted 330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained
13 Nov 2025	Gender Equality Strategy 2025 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 54 for, 59 against, 48 abstained	Adopted 310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained
13 Nov 2025	Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 100 for, 61 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 379 for, 248 against, 10 abstained
23 Oct 2025	Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law) Proposal to reject the text	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 73 for, 72 against, 3 abstained	Rejected 220 for, 341 against, 10 abstained
22 Oct 2025	Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 102 for, 54 against, 13 abstained	Adopted 310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Genetically modified maize DP51291 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 106 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 433 for, 166 against, 9 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 82 for, 56 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstained
9 Jul 2025	Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 to add certain countries to the list of high-risk third countries, and to remove other countries from that list Final vote — text as a whole (B10-0318/2025)	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 48 for, 116 against, 14 abstained	Rejected 264 for, 369 against, 55 abstained
12 Feb 2025	Genetically modified maize MON 95275 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 57 for, 96 against, 11 abstained	Adopted 467 for, 156 against, 18 abstained
12 Feb 2025	Genetically modified maize DP910521 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 58 for, 97 against, 11 abstained	Adopted 477 for, 152 against, 20 abstained
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 73 for, 21 against, 29 abstained	Adopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained
28 Nov 2024	Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 87 for, 41 against, 8 abstained	Rejected 152 for, 378 against, 26 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 94804 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 100 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 468 for, 166 against, 14 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize DP202216 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 58 for, 102 against, 10 abstained	Adopted 478 for, 165 against, 16 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize DP23211 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 57 for, 103 against, 10 abstained	Adopted 474 for, 166 against, 17 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize DP915635 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 55 for, 103 against, 12 abstained	Adopted 478 for, 166 against, 17 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 810 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 52 for, 102 against, 15 abstained	Adopted 464 for, 163 against, 27 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 56 for, 103 against, 10 abstained	Adopted 476 for, 169 against, 14 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified cotton COT102 Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 54 for, 107 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 496 for, 143 against, 18 abstained
26 Nov 2024	Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 57 for, 104 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 474 for, 171 against, 13 abstained
18 Sept 2024	Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 66 for, 103 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 522 for, 127 against, 28 abstained
18 Sept 2024	Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 63 for, 105 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 516 for, 129 against, 27 abstained

Show all 43 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=2&period=2026&vline=divided
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “European People’s Party (EPP)”. Political group. code PPE. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=2&period=2026&vline=divided (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-ppe,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{European People’s Party (EPP)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=2&period=2026&vline=divided}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ppe?page=2&period=2026&vline=divided},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code PPE. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}