Skip to content

Group

Greens

Greens / European Free Alliance

Seats
53 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes
0.93ⓘ over 619 of 620 final votes (enough members voting)
Cohesion, all roll calls
0.94ⓘ over 5 927 of 5 928 roll calls (enough members voting)
On the winning side
505 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted
More facts (6)
Official name
Greens / European Free Alliance
Code
Verts/ALE
Alignment
Centre-left · green politics, regionalism
Founded
1999
Closest line
S&D — 90 % of 593 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal
on 5 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome
More

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

Greens: 0.93 over the whole period (619 votes), 0.94 in Q4 2024 and 0.91 in Q3 2026.
Data as a table
Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
PeriodGreensThe LeftS&DRenewEPPECRPatriotsESN
Q3 2024—9 votes—9 votes—9 votes—8 votes—9 votes—9 votes—9 votes—9 votes
Q4 20240.9457 votes0.8157 votes0.9657 votes0.8357 votes0.8657 votes0.7457 votes0.7457 votes0.8757 votes
Q1 20250.9330 votes0.7130 votes0.9730 votes0.9130 votes0.9230 votes0.7330 votes0.7630 votes0.8130 votes
Q2 20250.9384 votes0.7884 votes0.9484 votes0.9584 votes0.9384 votes0.7184 votes0.7184 votes0.8784 votes
Q3 20250.9458 votes0.7658 votes0.9458 votes0.9358 votes0.9458 votes0.8258 votes0.7258 votes0.8558 votes
Q4 20250.95121 votes0.84121 votes0.94121 votes0.86121 votes0.88121 votes0.78121 votes0.73121 votes0.87121 votes
Q1 20260.8989 votes0.7588 votes0.9489 votes0.8689 votes0.9189 votes0.7589 votes0.7189 votes0.8689 votes
Q2 20260.9299 votes0.7599 votes0.9599 votes0.92100 votes0.94100 votes0.76100 votes0.7299 votes0.8299 votes
Q3 20260.9172 votes0.7572 votes0.9372 votes0.8672 votes0.8972 votes0.7572 votes0.6772 votes0.8772 votes
Whole period0.930.770.940.890.910.760.720.85
Votes considered619618619619620620619619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)
Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committeeVotesCohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET6390.93
BudgetsBUDG3750.92
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI3370.95
Budgetary ControlCONT3230.97
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE3230.96
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM2870.99
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON2490.92
International TradeINTA2030.88
Legal AffairsJURI1950.96
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL1930.98
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE1750.95
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS1540.96
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO1220.97
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI870.96
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS850.95
Constitutional AffairsAFCO700.98
FisheriesPECH650.99
PetitionsPETI610.95
Security and DefenceSEDE490.85
DevelopmentDEVE440.99
Culture and EducationCULT280.97
Public HealthSANT231.00
Regional DevelopmentREGI11—
Transport and TourismTRAN8—
LEGILEGI2—
By topic (model-assigned) (15)
Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
TopicVotesCohesion
Foreign affairs2 1360.91
Economy & single market1 2570.93
EU budget & funds1 0920.93
Defence & security7030.87
Justice, rule of law & rights6100.97
Jobs, social affairs & equality6060.99
Climate & environment5190.97
Agriculture, food & fisheries3640.93
Digital, AI & data2970.95
EU institutions & Parliament2920.97
Trade & customs2690.90
Health2600.96
Migration & asylum1220.96
Energy920.98
Transport & tourism840.98

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
GroupSame lineVotes compared
S&D90 %593
Renew87 %549
EPP81 %557
The Left74 %491
ECR63 %496
Patriots41 %477
ESN24 %574

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 54

Members whose group is Greens now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Open in the member register
What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of Greens
SelectMember, sort Z to ACountry, sort A to ZParticipation, sort highest first± groupWith majority line, sort highest first± groupAgainst clear line, sort highest first Abstention, sort highest first
Alexandra GEESE Germany92.1 % of 620−0.2 pts median 92.3 %97.0 % of 571+0.6 pts median 96.4 %1.6 % of 5534.6 % of 571
Alice KUHNKE Sweden99.0 % of 620+6.8 pts median 92.3 %96.3 % of 614−0.1 pts median 96.4 %2.2 % of 5945.2 % of 614
Ana MIRANDA PAZ Spain83.5 % of 620−8.7 pts median 92.3 %82.4 % of 518−14.0 pts median 96.4 %16.5 % of 50211.0 % of 518
Anna CAVAZZINI Germany98.7 % of 620+6.5 pts median 92.3 %97.2 % of 612+0.8 pts median 96.4 %1.5 % of 5924.4 % of 612
Anna STROLENBERG Netherlands98.9 % of 620+6.6 pts median 92.3 %96.7 % of 613+0.3 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5935.4 % of 613
Benedetta SCUDERI Italy93.2 % of 620+1.0 pts median 92.3 %90.8 % of 578−5.6 pts median 96.4 %8.2 % of 5597.1 % of 578
Catarina VIEIRA Netherlands91.0 % of 620−1.3 pts median 92.3 %97.2 % of 564+0.8 pts median 96.4 %1.8 % of 5475.3 % of 564
Cristina GUARDA Italy80.6 % of 620−11.6 pts median 92.3 %89.2 % of 500−7.2 pts median 96.4 %9.7 % of 4867.2 % of 500
Damian BOESELAGER Germany94.0 % of 620+1.8 pts median 92.3 %96.4 % of 583±0.0 pts median 96.4 %2.3 % of 5636.0 % of 583
Daniel FREUND Germany99.2 % of 620+6.9 pts median 92.3 %97.2 % of 615+0.8 pts median 96.4 %1.2 % of 5953.7 % of 615
David CORMAND France96.1 % of 620+3.9 pts median 92.3 %92.6 % of 596−3.8 pts median 96.4 %6.4 % of 5766.0 % of 596
Diana RIBA I GINER Spain80.3 % of 620−11.9 pts median 92.3 %88.4 % of 498−8.0 pts median 96.4 %10.5 % of 4867.8 % of 498
Erik MARQUARDT Germany92.3 % of 620±0.0 pts median 92.3 %96.7 % of 572+0.3 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5524.9 % of 572
Gordan BOSANAC Croatia98.1 % of 620+5.8 pts median 92.3 %97.9 % of 608+1.5 pts median 96.4 %1.0 % of 5885.4 % of 608
Hannah NEUMANN Germany93.1 % of 620+0.8 pts median 92.3 %97.1 % of 577+0.7 pts median 96.4 %1.6 % of 5594.7 % of 577
Ignazio Roberto MARINO Italy79.2 % of 620−13.1 pts median 92.3 %89.8 % of 491−6.6 pts median 96.4 %8.4 % of 4777.1 % of 491
Isabella LÖVIN Sweden92.3 % of 620±0.0 pts median 92.3 %96.3 % of 572−0.1 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5535.4 % of 572
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ Spain76.5 % of 620−15.8 pts median 92.3 %84.4 % of 474−12.0 pts median 96.4 %14.4 % of 45811.6 % of 474
Jutta PAULUS Germany89.7 % of 620−2.6 pts median 92.3 %96.4 % of 556±0.0 pts median 96.4 %1.9 % of 5375.0 % of 556
Kai TEGETHOFF Germany92.9 % of 620+0.6 pts median 92.3 %96.9 % of 576+0.5 pts median 96.4 %1.6 % of 5575.2 % of 576
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Germany90.3 % of 620−1.9 pts median 92.3 %97.3 % of 560+0.9 pts median 96.4 %1.5 % of 5425.0 % of 560
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK Netherlands91.3 % of 620−1.0 pts median 92.3 %96.6 % of 566+0.2 pts median 96.4 %2.2 % of 5494.9 % of 566
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN Denmark91.9 % of 620−0.3 pts median 92.3 %96.3 % of 570−0.1 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5524.6 % of 570
Lena SCHILLING Austria95.8 % of 620+3.5 pts median 92.3 %96.6 % of 594+0.2 pts median 96.4 %1.9 % of 5755.9 % of 594
Leoluca ORLANDO Italy83.4 % of 620−8.9 pts median 92.3 %89.7 % of 517−6.7 pts median 96.4 %8.4 % of 5006.4 % of 517
Majdouline SBAI France44.2 % of 620−48.1 pts median 92.3 %93.8 % of 274−2.6 pts median 96.4 %4.5 % of 2654.0 % of 274
Maria OHISALO Finland81.5 % of 620−10.8 pts median 92.3 %98.6 % of 505+2.2 pts median 96.4 %0.2 % of 4864.0 % of 505
Marie TOUSSAINT France92.4 % of 620+0.2 pts median 92.3 %92.8 % of 573−3.6 pts median 96.4 %6.0 % of 5546.1 % of 573
Markéta GREGOROVÁ Czechia91.6 % of 620−0.6 pts median 92.3 %94.9 % of 568−1.5 pts median 96.4 %3.5 % of 5484.4 % of 568
Martin HÄUSLING Germany96.9 % of 620+4.7 pts median 92.3 %97.3 % of 601+0.9 pts median 96.4 %1.4 % of 5824.3 % of 601
Mārtiņš STAĶIS Latvia97.7 % of 620+5.5 pts median 92.3 %92.9 % of 606−3.5 pts median 96.4 %5.5 % of 5865.4 % of 606
Mélissa CAMARA France82.3 % of 620−10.0 pts median 92.3 %93.5 % of 510−2.9 pts median 96.4 %5.1 % of 4915.7 % of 510
Michael BLOSS Germany97.3 % of 620+5.0 pts median 92.3 %97.3 % of 603+0.9 pts median 96.4 %1.5 % of 5834.3 % of 603
Mounir SATOURI France91.0 % of 620−1.3 pts median 92.3 %93.4 % of 564−3.0 pts median 96.4 %5.0 % of 5455.5 % of 564
Nela RIEHL Germany94.5 % of 620+2.3 pts median 92.3 %96.2 % of 586−0.2 pts median 96.4 %2.5 % of 5685.3 % of 586
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ Romania67.6 % of 620−24.7 pts median 92.3 %98.1 % of 419+1.7 pts median 96.4 %0.7 % of 4033.8 % of 419
Pär HOLMGREN Sweden96.0 % of 620+3.7 pts median 92.3 %96.3 % of 595−0.1 pts median 96.4 %2.1 % of 5755.7 % of 595
Rasmus ANDRESEN Germany93.1 % of 620+0.8 pts median 92.3 %97.1 % of 577+0.7 pts median 96.4 %1.4 % of 5604.7 % of 577
Rasmus NORDQVIST Denmark99.4 % of 620+7.1 pts median 92.3 %96.9 % of 616+0.5 pts median 96.4 %1.7 % of 5974.5 % of 616
Reinier VAN LANSCHOT Netherlands95.8 % of 620+3.5 pts median 92.3 %96.6 % of 594+0.2 pts median 96.4 %1.9 % of 5755.4 % of 594
Sara MATTHIEU Belgium90.2 % of 620−2.1 pts median 92.3 %97.7 % of 559+1.3 pts median 96.4 %1.3 % of 5394.3 % of 559
Saskia BRICMONT Belgium90.2 % of 620−2.1 pts median 92.3 %94.5 % of 559−1.9 pts median 96.4 %4.4 % of 5446.4 % of 559
Sergey LAGODINSKY Germany76.1 % of 620−16.1 pts median 92.3 %94.9 % of 472−1.5 pts median 96.4 %3.9 % of 4565.1 % of 472
Terry REINTKE Germany92.6 % of 620+0.3 pts median 92.3 %99.3 % of 574+2.9 pts median 96.4 %0.0 % of 5593.3 % of 574
Thomas WAITZ Austria96.9 % of 620+4.7 pts median 92.3 %96.2 % of 601−0.2 pts median 96.4 %2.4 % of 5826.3 % of 601
Tilly METZ Luxembourg96.5 % of 620+4.2 pts median 92.3 %95.0 % of 598−1.4 pts median 96.4 %4.0 % of 5816.2 % of 598
Tineke STRIK Netherlands91.8 % of 620−0.5 pts median 92.3 %97.4 % of 569+1.0 pts median 96.4 %2.0 % of 5535.3 % of 569
Ufuk KÂHYA Netherlands98.6 % of 72+6.4 pts median 92.3 %95.8 % of 71−0.6 pts median 96.4 %2.9 % of 698.5 % of 71
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ Spain89.4 % of 620−2.9 pts median 92.3 %85.6 % of 554−10.8 pts median 96.4 %13.3 % of 53410.6 % of 554
Ville NIINISTÖ Finland70.3 % of 620−21.9 pts median 92.3 %99.1 % of 436+2.7 pts median 96.4 %0.2 % of 4294.6 % of 436

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
CountryMembersNational parties
Germany15 GRÜNE. 12 · V 3
Netherlands6 PRO 4 · Volt 2
France5 Les Écologistes 5
Spain4 BNG 1 · Catalunya en Comú 1 · Compromís 1 · ERC 1
Italy4 E.Verde 2 · No party 2
Denmark3 F 3
Sweden3 MP 3
Austria2 Die Grünen 2
Belgium2 ECOLO 1 · GROEN 1
Finland2 VIHR 2
Czechia1 PIR 1
Croatia1 Možemo! 1
Lithuania1 DSVL 1
Luxembourg1 Déi Gréng 1
Latvia1 Progresīvie 1
Romania1 No party 1
Slovenia1 Prerod 1

Line on the final votes, 20

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
DateVoteMajority lineIn the groupResult
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Final vote — text as a wholeMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 30 for, 0 against, 20 abstainedAdopted 530 for, 77 against, 61 abstained
15 Sept 2026Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances Final voteMajority line: Abstained · no clear lineIn the group: 8 for, 13 against, 28 abstainedAdopted 367 for, 240 against, 59 abstained
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Interim Agreement on Trade Final vote on the draft Council decisionMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 33 for, 14 against, 3 abstainedAdopted 474 for, 131 against, 60 abstained
16 Jun 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreementMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 18 for, 25 against, 3 abstainedAdopted 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreementMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 22 for, 20 against, 3 abstainedAdopted 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstained
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 1 for, 27 against, 14 abstainedAdopted 294 for, 194 against, 86 abstained
21 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposures Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 1 for, 24 against, 17 abstainedAdopted 294 for, 192 against, 90 abstained
28 Apr 2026Generalised scheme of tariff preferences Final voteMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 21 for, 12 against, 13 abstainedAdopted 459 for, 127 against, 70 abstained
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final voteMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 19 for, 24 against, 5 abstainedAdopted 437 for, 144 against, 60 abstained
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final voteMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 18 for, 25 against, 5 abstainedAdopted 417 for, 154 against, 71 abstained
12 Feb 2026Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts Final vote — text as a wholeMajority line: Abstained · no clear lineIn the group: 18 for, 0 against, 22 abstainedAdopted 502 for, 2 against, 59 abstained
13 Nov 2025Digital Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore Final vote on the draft Council decisionMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 6 for, 31 against, 10 abstainedAdopted 515 for, 93 against, 33 abstained
23 Oct 2025InvestEU Fund strategic investments in the field of defence Final vote on the motion for a resolutionMajority line: Abstained · no clear lineIn the group: 11 for, 8 against, 24 abstainedRejected 124 for, 401 against, 41 abstained
10 Sept 2025European Social Fund (ESF+): specific measures to address strategic challenges Final vote on the provisional agreementMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 24 for, 11 against, 13 abstainedAdopted 453 for, 149 against, 59 abstained
3 Apr 2025Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements Final voteMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 28 for, 19 against, 4 abstainedAdopted 531 for, 69 against, 17 abstained
2 Apr 2025Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeMajority line: Abstained · no clear lineIn the group: 21 for, 8 against, 22 abstainedAdopted 378 for, 188 against, 105 abstained
18 Dec 2024EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tuvalu Final vote on the draft Council decisionMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 18 for, 26 against, 0 abstainedAdopted 533 for, 74 against, 26 abstained
18 Dec 2024EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Niue Final vote on the draft Council decisionMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 19 for, 29 against, 0 abstainedAdopted 543 for, 77 against, 31 abstained
18 Dec 2024EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tonga Final vote on the draft Council decisionMajority line: Against · no clear lineIn the group: 17 for, 32 against, 0 abstainedAdopted 545 for, 81 against, 26 abstained
27 Nov 2024Election of the Commission Election election of the commissionMajority line: For · no clear lineIn the group: 27 for, 19 against, 6 abstainedAdopted 370 for, 282 against, 36 abstained

Show all 20 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Greens / European Free Alliance (Greens)”. Political group. code Verts/ALE. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?delegations=all&scope=final&vline=divided (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-group-greens-efa,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Greens / European Free Alliance (Greens)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?delegations=all&scope=final&vline=divided}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/greens-efa?delegations=all&scope=final&vline=divided},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code Verts/ALE. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}