Group

ECR

European Conservatives and Reformists

Seats: 84 of 718 current members
Cohesion, final votes: 0.76ⓘ over 620 final votes
Cohesion, all roll calls: 0.81ⓘ over 5 928 roll calls
On the winning side: 402 of 619ⓘ final votes decided by a simple majority where its clear line matched the outcome — of 620 final votes, 1 failed for want of an absolute majority and is not counted

More facts (6)

Official name: European Conservatives and Reformists
Code: ECR
Alignment: Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical
Founded: 2009
Closest line: EPP — 78 % of 472 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 6 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Official name: European Conservatives and Reformists
Code: ECR
Alignment: Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical
Founded: 2009
Closest line: EPP — 78 % of 472 votes where both had a clear lineⓘ
Pivotal: on 6 of 619 final votes decided by a simple majorityⓘ taking its members’ votes away would have flipped the outcome

Cite this page

Link to this page

Cohesion over time

Agreement Index of the group on final roll-call votes, per quarter (1 = all voted the same way). Members counted in their group on the day; a vote counts for the group when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted, and a gap is a quarter with fewer than 20 votes counted. The other groups are the faint lines.

ECR: 0.76 over the whole period (620 votes), 0.74 in Q4 2024 and 0.75 in Q3 2026.

Data as a table

Agreement Index per period (0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same), with the votes counted in it. — : fewer than 20 votes counted in the period (a vote counts for a bloc when at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted).
Period	ECR	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	Patriots	ESN
Q3 2024	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—8 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes	—9 votes
Q4 2024	0.7457 votes	0.8157 votes	0.9457 votes	0.9657 votes	0.8357 votes	0.8657 votes	0.7457 votes	0.8757 votes
Q1 2025	0.7330 votes	0.7130 votes	0.9330 votes	0.9730 votes	0.9130 votes	0.9230 votes	0.7630 votes	0.8130 votes
Q2 2025	0.7184 votes	0.7884 votes	0.9384 votes	0.9484 votes	0.9584 votes	0.9384 votes	0.7184 votes	0.8784 votes
Q3 2025	0.8258 votes	0.7658 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9458 votes	0.9358 votes	0.9458 votes	0.7258 votes	0.8558 votes
Q4 2025	0.78121 votes	0.84121 votes	0.95121 votes	0.94121 votes	0.86121 votes	0.88121 votes	0.73121 votes	0.87121 votes
Q1 2026	0.7589 votes	0.7588 votes	0.8989 votes	0.9489 votes	0.8689 votes	0.9189 votes	0.7189 votes	0.8689 votes
Q2 2026	0.76100 votes	0.7599 votes	0.9299 votes	0.9599 votes	0.92100 votes	0.94100 votes	0.7299 votes	0.8299 votes
Q3 2026	0.7572 votes	0.7572 votes	0.9172 votes	0.9372 votes	0.8672 votes	0.8972 votes	0.6772 votes	0.8772 votes
Whole period	0.76	0.77	0.93	0.94	0.89	0.91	0.72	0.85
Votes considered	620	618	619	619	619	620	619	619

620 of 794 decisions of the term had a final vote recorded by name; those are the votes counted. A gap: fewer than 20 votes counted in the quarter (method). Cohesion of every group.

Cohesion by committee and topic

The group’s Agreement Index over the term’s roll calls, by the dossier’s lead committee and by topic. Topics are model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked).

By lead committee (25)

Lead committee: the committee that led the dossier. Votes: the term’s roll calls on its dossiers. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Lead committee	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign AffairsAFET	639	0.78
BudgetsBUDG	375	0.75
Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI	337	0.83
Budgetary ControlCONT	323	0.84
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE	323	0.82
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM	287	0.79
Economic and Monetary AffairsECON	249	0.75
International TradeINTA	203	0.83
Legal AffairsJURI	195	0.95
Employment and Social AffairsEMPL	193	0.78
Industry, Research and EnergyITRE	175	0.84
Housing Crisis (special committee)HOUS	154	0.88
Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO	122	0.84
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI	87	0.77
European Democracy Shield (special committee)EUDS	85	0.79
Constitutional AffairsAFCO	70	0.90
FisheriesPECH	65	0.86
PetitionsPETI	61	0.90
Security and DefenceSEDE	49	0.78
DevelopmentDEVE	44	0.79
Culture and EducationCULT	28	0.71
Public HealthSANT	23	0.71
Regional DevelopmentREGI	11	—
Transport and TourismTRAN	8	—
LEGILEGI	2	—

By topic (model-assigned) (15)

Topic: model-assigned (AI tagging, not hand-checked). Votes: the term’s roll calls on decisions with that topic. Cohesion: the group’s Agreement Index over those votes (0–1), counted only on votes where at least 10 of its members and a third of its seats voted; — : fewer than 20 such votes.
Topic	Votes	Cohesion
Foreign affairs	2 136	0.81
Economy & single market	1 257	0.84
EU budget & funds	1 092	0.77
Defence & security	703	0.79
Justice, rule of law & rights	610	0.81
Jobs, social affairs & equality	606	0.77
Climate & environment	519	0.88
Agriculture, food & fisheries	364	0.79
Digital, AI & data	297	0.79
EU institutions & Parliament	292	0.84
Trade & customs	269	0.80
Health	260	0.80
Migration & asylum	122	0.87
Energy	92	0.83
Transport & tourism	84	0.87

Agreement with other groups

How often the group took the same line as each other group on the term’s final votes, groups at the date of each vote.

Same line: of the votes compared, the share where the two groups’ clear lines were the same. Votes compared: final votes where both groups had a clear line (at least two thirds of their votes cast, at least 10 members voting); a vote where either was divided is left out. A count instead of a share under 20 votes.
Group	Same line	Votes compared
EPP	78 %	472
Renew	75 %	463
Patriots	74 %	408
S&D	72 %	506
Greens	63 %	496
The Left	49 %	423
ESN	48 %	489

Agreement between every pair of groups, winning sides and pivotal groups

Members, 79

Members whose group is ECR now (former members: on their last day in office), with their record. Switchers are marked ⇄ and counted in the group of each vote’s date.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Open in the member register

What the columns mean

Participationⓘ: roll calls with a recorded vote, of the roll calls while in office. With majority lineⓘ: votes cast the way the plurality of their group voted, of the votes where the group had a line. Against clear lineⓘ: votes otherwise than a line held by at least two thirds of their group with at least 10 members voting, of the votes where it had one. Abstentionⓘ: of the votes cast. ± group: difference from the median of the member’s group (the one they held for most of the period), in percentage points; not compared for a member who changed group in the period; the non-attached have no group line. Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of each vote; a figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

Members of ECR
Select	Member, sort Z to A	Country, sort A to Z	Participation, sort highest first	± group	With majority line, sort highest first	± group	Against clear line, sort highest first	Abstention, sort highest first
Select Adam BIELAN	Adam BIELAN	Poland	92.4 % of 5 928	+0.7 pts median 91.6 %	92.0 % of 5 460	+0.9 pts median 91.1 %	2.7 % of 4 742	8.6 % of 5 476
Select Adrian-George AXINIA	Adrian-George AXINIA	Romania	85.3 % of 5 928	−6.3 pts median 91.6 %	90.0 % of 5 042	−1.1 pts median 91.1 %	6.5 % of 4 394	9.0 % of 5 056
Select Alberico GAMBINO	Alberico GAMBINO	Italy	75.9 % of 5 928	−15.8 pts median 91.6 %	92.6 % of 4 485	+1.4 pts median 91.1 %	1.2 % of 3 909	11.1 % of 4 497
Select Alessandro CIRIANI	Alessandro CIRIANI	Italy	86.2 % of 5 928	−5.4 pts median 91.6 %	93.2 % of 5 095	+2.1 pts median 91.1 %	1.0 % of 4 448	10.8 % of 5 111
Select Alexandr VONDRA	Alexandr VONDRA	Czechia	89.5 % of 5 928	−2.1 pts median 91.6 %	85.6 % of 5 289	−5.6 pts median 91.1 %	11.1 % of 4 617	8.8 % of 5 306
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	Poland	98.2 % of 5 928	+6.6 pts median 91.6 %	91.2 % of 5 807	+0.1 pts median 91.1 %	3.2 % of 5 058	8.2 % of 5 824
Select Antonella SBERNA	Antonella SBERNA	Italy	87.2 % of 5 928	−4.5 pts median 91.6 %	92.6 % of 5 151	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.1 % of 4 474	11.3 % of 5 167
Select Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Arkadiusz MULARCZYK	Poland	96.3 % of 5 928	+4.6 pts median 91.6 %	91.5 % of 5 690	+0.3 pts median 91.1 %	3.3 % of 4 950	8.0 % of 5 706
Select Assita KANKO	Assita KANKO	Belgium	66.8 % of 5 928	−24.9 pts median 91.6 %	66.8 % of 3 947	−24.4 pts median 91.1 %	31.2 % of 3 394	21.8 % of 3 958
Select Aurelijus VERYGA	Aurelijus VERYGA	Lithuania	90.6 % of 5 928	−1.0 pts median 91.6 %	90.1 % of 5 358	−1.1 pts median 91.1 %	6.0 % of 4 658	7.2 % of 5 372
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	Poland	93.3 % of 5 928	+1.7 pts median 91.6 %	91.3 % of 5 516	+0.2 pts median 91.1 %	3.3 % of 4 804	8.0 % of 5 531
Select Beatrice TIMGREN	Beatrice TIMGREN	Sweden	98.5 % of 5 928	+6.9 pts median 91.6 %	73.9 % of 5 825	−17.3 pts median 91.1 %	23.0 % of 5 065	8.8 % of 5 842
Select Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Bert-Jan RUISSEN	Netherlands	99.7 % of 5 928	+8.1 pts median 91.6 %	86.2 % of 5 896	−4.9 pts median 91.1 %	10.9 % of 5 133	10.2 % of 5 913
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	Poland	99.1 % of 5 928	+7.5 pts median 91.6 %	91.1 % of 5 859	±0.0 pts median 91.1 %	3.4 % of 5 096	7.8 % of 5 876
Select Carlo CICCIOLI	Carlo CICCIOLI	Italy	81.5 % of 5 928	−10.1 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 4 819	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.5 % of 4 181	10.6 % of 4 834
Select Carlo FIDANZA	Carlo FIDANZA	Italy	94.2 % of 5 928	+2.5 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 567	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.0 % of 4 843	11.2 % of 5 582
Select Charlie WEIMERS	Charlie WEIMERS	Sweden	97.2 % of 5 928	+5.6 pts median 91.6 %	73.9 % of 5 748	−17.2 pts median 91.1 %	23.0 % of 5 004	8.8 % of 5 764
Select Chiara GEMMA	Chiara GEMMA	Italy	98.3 % of 5 928	+6.7 pts median 91.6 %	92.4 % of 5 813	+1.3 pts median 91.1 %	1.5 % of 5 059	11.3 % of 5 830
Select Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Claudiu-Richard TÂRZIU	Romania	94.3 % of 5 928	+2.7 pts median 91.6 %	87.8 % of 5 576	−3.3 pts median 91.1 %	8.4 % of 4 870	9.9 % of 5 592
Select Cristian TERHEŞ	Cristian TERHEŞ	Romania	79.6 % of 5 928	−12.0 pts median 91.6 %	84.9 % of 4 707	−6.3 pts median 91.1 %	11.0 % of 4 125	7.0 % of 4 719
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	Poland	82.8 % of 5 928	−8.8 pts median 91.6 %	91.4 % of 4 893	+0.2 pts median 91.1 %	3.2 % of 4 248	7.9 % of 4 909
Select Daniele POLATO	Daniele POLATO	Italy	98.2 % of 5 928	+6.6 pts median 91.6 %	92.6 % of 5 805	+1.4 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 5 044	11.4 % of 5 822
Select Denis NESCI	Denis NESCI	Italy	99.6 % of 5 928	+8.0 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 888	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 5 122	11.2 % of 5 905
Select Dick ERIXON	Dick ERIXON	Sweden	98.4 % of 5 928	+6.8 pts median 91.6 %	73.8 % of 5 816	−17.4 pts median 91.1 %	23.2 % of 5 054	8.8 % of 5 833
Select Diego SOLIER	Diego SOLIER changed group Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.	Spain	94.9 % of 5 928	not compared median 91.6 %	93.6 % of 5 274	not compared median 91.1 %	2.3 % of 4 603	9.9 % of 5 628
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Poland	64.0 % of 5 928	−27.6 pts median 91.6 %	90.9 % of 3 781	−0.3 pts median 91.1 %	3.6 % of 3 249	8.4 % of 3 795
Select Elena DONAZZAN	Elena DONAZZAN	Italy	87.8 % of 5 928	−3.9 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 186	+1.6 pts median 91.1 %	1.3 % of 4 509	10.9 % of 5 202
Select Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Emmanouil FRAGKOS	Greece	96.2 % of 5 928	+4.6 pts median 91.6 %	68.8 % of 5 685	−22.3 pts median 91.1 %	27.8 % of 4 955	15.9 % of 5 702
Select Francesco TORSELLI	Francesco TORSELLI	Italy	97.5 % of 5 928	+5.9 pts median 91.6 %	92.9 % of 5 766	+1.7 pts median 91.1 %	1.1 % of 5 019	11.2 % of 5 782
Select Francesco VENTOLA	Francesco VENTOLA	Italy	87.7 % of 5 928	−3.9 pts median 91.6 %	92.6 % of 5 184	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.1 % of 4 505	11.4 % of 5 199
Select Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Galato ALEXANDRAKI	Greece	67.1 % of 5 928	−24.5 pts median 91.6 %	70.7 % of 3 965	−20.5 pts median 91.1 %	25.7 % of 3 435	15.2 % of 3 978
Select Geadis GEADI	Geadis GEADI	Cyprus	92.7 % of 5 928	+1.1 pts median 91.6 %	84.4 % of 5 480	−6.7 pts median 91.1 %	12.1 % of 4 783	8.9 % of 5 496
Select Georgiana TEODORESCU	Georgiana TEODORESCU	Romania	93.1 % of 5 928	+1.5 pts median 91.6 %	81.6 % of 5 503	−9.6 pts median 91.1 %	14.0 % of 4 794	10.7 % of 5 519
Select Gheorghe PIPEREA	Gheorghe PIPEREA	Romania	83.3 % of 5 928	−8.3 pts median 91.6 %	85.4 % of 4 922	−5.8 pts median 91.1 %	11.1 % of 4 269	9.9 % of 4 938
Select Giovanni CROSETTO	Giovanni CROSETTO	Italy	91.6 % of 5 928	±0.0 pts median 91.6 %	92.7 % of 5 417	+1.5 pts median 91.1 %	1.2 % of 4 701	11.1 % of 5 432
Select Giuseppe MILAZZO	Giuseppe MILAZZO	Italy	47.1 % of 5 928	−44.6 pts median 91.6 %	91.9 % of 2 780	+0.7 pts median 91.1 %	1.8 % of 2 394	10.4 % of 2 790
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	France	86.4 % of 5 928	−5.3 pts median 91.6 %	78.5 % of 5 106	−12.6 pts median 91.1 %	16.7 % of 4 463	6.9 % of 5 120
Select Ivaylo VALCHEV	Ivaylo VALCHEV	Bulgaria	97.5 % of 5 928	+5.8 pts median 91.6 %	92.5 % of 5 760	+1.3 pts median 91.1 %	4.3 % of 5 011	10.0 % of 5 777
Select Jaak MADISON	Jaak MADISON	Estonia	82.7 % of 5 928	−9.0 pts median 91.6 %	89.0 % of 4 884	−2.1 pts median 91.1 %	7.4 % of 4 255	5.9 % of 4 900
Select Jacek OZDOBA	Jacek OZDOBA	Poland	90.1 % of 5 928	−1.6 pts median 91.6 %	90.6 % of 5 323	−0.6 pts median 91.1 %	3.8 % of 4 654	7.9 % of 5 340
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Poland	96.4 % of 5 928	+4.8 pts median 91.6 %	91.3 % of 5 699	+0.1 pts median 91.1 %	3.2 % of 4 955	7.6 % of 5 715
Select Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI	Poland	93.6 % of 5 928	+1.9 pts median 91.6 %	90.9 % of 5 531	−0.3 pts median 91.1 %	3.7 % of 4 813	8.3 % of 5 547
Select Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Johan VAN OVERTVELDT	Belgium	57.6 % of 5 928	−34.0 pts median 91.6 %	67.9 % of 3 407	−23.2 pts median 91.1 %	30.1 % of 2 957	22.0 % of 3 417
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Poland	98.9 % of 5 928	+7.3 pts median 91.6 %	91.4 % of 5 847	+0.2 pts median 91.1 %	3.0 % of 5 081	7.9 % of 5 864
Select Kris VAN DIJCK	Kris VAN DIJCK	Belgium	90.9 % of 5 928	−0.7 pts median 91.6 %	67.8 % of 5 375	−23.4 pts median 91.1 %	30.2 % of 4 663	21.3 % of 5 391
Select Kristoffer STORM	Kristoffer STORM	Denmark	91.9 % of 5 928	+0.3 pts median 91.6 %	74.5 % of 5 432	−16.6 pts median 91.1 %	22.0 % of 4 721	9.6 % of 5 447
Select Lara MAGONI	Lara MAGONI	Italy	96.1 % of 5 928	+4.4 pts median 91.6 %	92.3 % of 5 679	+1.2 pts median 91.1 %	1.6 % of 4 932	11.4 % of 5 695
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	France	95.9 % of 5 928	+4.2 pts median 91.6 %	77.7 % of 5 665	−13.5 pts median 91.1 %	17.6 % of 4 934	7.5 % of 5 682
Select Maciej WĄSIK	Maciej WĄSIK	Poland	96.1 % of 5 928	+4.5 pts median 91.6 %	91.0 % of 5 683	−0.2 pts median 91.1 %	3.5 % of 4 938	7.6 % of 5 699
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Poland	90.8 % of 5 928	−0.8 pts median 91.6 %	91.7 % of 5 367	+0.5 pts median 91.1 %	2.7 % of 4 658	7.8 % of 5 382

National delegations

The group’s current members by country and national party.

Country: the delegation. Members: the group’s current members from that country. National parties: their parties, with the number of members of each.
Country	Members	National parties
Italy	24	FdL 24
Poland	20	PiS 20
Romania	6	AUR 3 · ACT 2 · PNCR 1
Czechia	4	ODS 3 · Ind. 1
France	4	IDL 4
Belgium	3	N-VA 3
Bulgaria	3	DPS 2 · ITN 1
Latvia	3	TB/LNNK 2 · AS 1
Netherlands	3	BBB 2 · SGP 1
Sweden	3	SD 3

Show all 18 delegations

Line on the final votes, 620

The group’s line on every final roll-call vote of the term, newest first, with its members counted in the group they sat in on the day.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.

Majority line: the position most of the group’s voting members took, on the day of the vote (“Tie” when no position won); “no clear line” when no position had at least two thirds of its votes cast with at least 10 members voting — the Divided filter lists those. In the group: for–against–abstained. Result: the vote’s outcome and counts. On the losing side: the majority line was For and the vote failed, or Against and it passed.
Date	Vote	Majority line	In the group	Result
21 Oct 2025	A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 39 for, 18 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 505 for, 62 against, 47 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 1 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 327 for, 256 against, 58 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Monitoring framework for resilient European forests Proposal to reject the text	Majority line: For	In the group: 69 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 370 for, 264 against, 9 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 0 for, 43 against, 26 abstained	Adopted 446 for, 162 against, 35 abstained
21 Oct 2025	General Data Protection Regulation: additional procedural rules relating to the enforcement of the Regulation Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 64 for, 3 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 533 for, 43 against, 68 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 5 for, 36 against, 28 abstained	Adopted 469 for, 126 against, 50 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 6 for, 39 against, 24 abstained	Adopted 477 for, 93 against, 76 abstained
21 Oct 2025	Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicals Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 4 for, 37 against, 28 abstained	Adopted 471 for, 123 against, 48 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Second World Summit for Social Development Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 0 for, 66 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained
9 Oct 2025	United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 1 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 469 for, 97 against, 38 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 58 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 504 for, 74 against, 30 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 60 for, 6 against, 3 abstained	Adopted 535 for, 24 against, 55 abstained
9 Oct 2025	The role of simple tax rules and tax fragmentation in European competitiveness Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 37 for, 10 against, 22 abstained	Adopted 499 for, 66 against, 53 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcement Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 45 for, 12 against, 12 abstained	Adopted 414 for, 139 against, 61 abstained
9 Oct 2025	10th anniversary of the detention of jailed Swedish publisher Gui Minhai in China Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For	In the group: 63 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 546 for, 3 against, 44 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in Cabaret Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 62 for, 0 against, 7 abstained	Adopted 550 for, 3 against, 54 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Motion of censure on the Commission Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: Against · no clear line	In the group: 22 for, 34 against, 11 abstained	Rejected 133 for, 383 against, 78 abstained
9 Oct 2025	Motion of censure on the Commission Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 38 for, 5 against, 25 abstained	Rejected 179 for, 378 against, 37 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Genetically modified maize DP51291 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 58 for, 12 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 433 for, 166 against, 9 abstained
8 Oct 2025	EU political strategy on Latin America Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Abstained · no clear line	In the group: 0 for, 25 against, 48 abstained	Adopted 354 for, 195 against, 77 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/001 BE/BelGaN – Belgium Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 58 for, 9 against, 5 abstained	Adopted 578 for, 47 against, 16 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/002 DE/Goodyear 2 – Germany Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 57 for, 9 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 577 for, 47 against, 15 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 53 for, 12 against, 8 abstained	Adopted 479 for, 82 against, 77 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States Final vote	Majority line: Abstained	In the group: 2 for, 12 against, 58 abstained	Adopted 412 for, 129 against, 98 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Withdrawal of the European Union from the International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 72 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 594 for, 38 against, 2 abstained
8 Oct 2025	EC-Côte d’Ivoire Fisheries Partnership Agreement – Protocol on the implementation of the Agreement for 2025-2029 Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 4 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 520 for, 97 against, 12 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 67 for, 0 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 532 for, 78 against, 25 abstained
8 Oct 2025	Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 72 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 492 for, 111 against, 39 abstained
7 Oct 2025	Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Final vote	Majority line: Against	In the group: 2 for, 71 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 458 for, 182 against, 11 abstained
7 Oct 2025	Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 43 for, 10 against, 19 abstained	Adopted 552 for, 52 against, 35 abstained
7 Oct 2025	Inland waterway transport: River Information Systems (RIS) Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 67 for, 6 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 636 for, 10 against, 4 abstained
7 Oct 2025	Revision of the Visa Suspension Mechanism Final vote on the provisional agreement	Majority line: For	In the group: 72 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 518 for, 96 against, 24 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 60 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Abstained · no clear line	In the group: 0 for, 22 against, 43 abstained	Adopted 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Stock-taking of the European elections 2024 Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Against	In the group: 1 for, 68 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 388 for, 186 against, 34 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 3 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 459 for, 65 against, 90 abstained
11 Sept 2025	A new vision for the European Universities alliances Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 42 for, 3 against, 24 abstained	Adopted 461 for, 100 against, 48 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspects Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 3 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 535 for, 36 against, 47 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Case of Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 68 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 549 for, 2 against, 41 abstained
11 Sept 2025	Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 66 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 597 for, 0 against, 5 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 65 for, 5 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 490 for, 65 against, 86 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 64 for, 4 against, 4 abstained	Adopted 393 for, 145 against, 123 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 43 for, 24 against, 6 abstained	Adopted 513 for, 111 against, 40 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For	In the group: 58 for, 13 against, 2 abstained	Adopted 462 for, 142 against, 63 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: For · no clear line	In the group: 40 for, 11 against, 22 abstained	Adopted 519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Investments and reforms for European competitiveness and the creation of a Capital Markets Union Final vote — text as a whole	Majority line: Abstained	In the group: 0 for, 11 against, 61 abstained	Adopted 407 for, 161 against, 97 abstained
10 Sept 2025	EU-Switzerland Cooperation Agreement: European Satellite Navigation Programmes Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 73 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 627 for, 4 against, 33 abstained
10 Sept 2025	EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Vanuatu Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 71 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 528 for, 89 against, 48 abstained
10 Sept 2025	Extension of the timeframe for the establishment of the Eurojust case management system Final vote	Majority line: For	In the group: 72 for, 0 against, 1 abstained	Adopted 634 for, 4 against, 29 abstained
10 Sept 2025	EC-India Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: renewal of the Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decision	Majority line: For	In the group: 71 for, 0 against, 0 abstained	Adopted 624 for, 9 against, 32 abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Connections

Top partners and the committees where the group’s cohesion is lowest or highest.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ecr?dir=asc&scope=all&vpage=8
Official source: Political groups, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: members and their memberships
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)”. Political group. code ECR. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ecr?dir=asc&scope=all&vpage=8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Political groups, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/show-current?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-group-ecr,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ecr?dir=asc&scope=all&vpage=8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/groups/ecr?dir=asc&scope=all&vpage=8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Political group. code ECR. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/political-groups. Data: EP Open Data: members and their memberships (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}