Skip to content

Decision

Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel

Effect
Consent given
Result
563 for · 44 against · 56 abstained roll call
Date
16 June 2026, 13:36
Kind
International agreement · Consent procedure
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Johan Van Overtveldt
Topics
EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
193493
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Consent given by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament gave its consent.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 3Abst. 32No vote 2 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.62
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 129Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 170Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 71Against 4Abst. 2No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 57Against 11Abst. 11No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 10No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 41

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria125030.56
Belgium161410.64
Bulgaria133010.72
Cyprus5001—
Czechia171210.78
Germany6812970.65
Denmark141000.90
Estonia6001—
Spain4601040.73
Finland130110.89
France650880.84
Greece142320.61
Croatia120001.00
Hungary171030.92
Ireland90320.63
Italy6211030.77
Lithuania9002—
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia9000—
Malta5001—
Netherlands237010.65
Poland443330.82
Portugal170220.84
Romania271050.95
Sweden183000.79
Slovenia6003—
Slovakia112110.68

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0158/2026 – Johan Van Overtveldt – Draft Council decision Roll call563 for, 44 against, 56 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0158

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The Council asked Parliament to consent to a decision on measures for implementing Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the ECSC Treaty's expiry and the Research Fund for Coal and Steel.

Parliament gave its consent, meaning the Council can adopt the decision.

Parliament instructed its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and national parliaments.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament gives its consent to the draft Council decision implementing Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, repealing Decision No 2003/76/EC.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0390(APP) · Consent procedure

Laying down the measures necessary for the implementation of Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty for the Functioning of the European Union

Parliament gave its consent on 16 June 2026. The Council can now conclude the act.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 27 April 2026 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 8 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 16 June 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council (to come)

Lead committee: BUDG · Rapporteur: Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 1 connection: Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel”. Decision, 16 June 2026. votingId 193493, document A-10-2026-0158, reference 2025/0390(APP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/7 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-16/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-16-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-16/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193493, document A-10-2026-0158, reference 2025/0390(APP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}