Skip to content

Decision

EU-Lebanon Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Effect
Consent given
Result
581 for · 12 against · 45 abstained roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:20
Kind
International agreement · Consent procedure
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Jaroslav Bžoch
Topics
Foreign affairsJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
192445
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 581 for, 12 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Consent given by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament gave its consent.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; The Left and ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 6Abst. 24No vote 3 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 159Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 4Against 2Abst. 20No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 22Against 3Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 7

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria190011.00
Belgium180220.85
Bulgaria100250.75
Cyprus2004—
Czechia200100.93
Germany7421550.72
Denmark140100.90
Estonia6001—
Spain472290.88
Finland110310.68
France5307210.82
Greece153120.68
Croatia110011.00
Hungary160031.00
Ireland120200.79
Italy660370.93
Lithuania110001.00
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia9000—
Malta2004—
Netherlands291100.90
Poland473030.91
Portugal181110.85
Romania280051.00
Sweden180210.85
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia110220.77

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0132/2026 – Jaroslav Bžoch – Draft Council decision Roll call581 for, 12 against, 45 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0132

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The agreement lets Eurojust cooperate and exchange personal data with Lebanese judicial authorities to fight serious cross-border crime such as terrorism, cybercrime, drug and arms trafficking, and migrant smuggling.

Parliament gave its consent to the agreement, meaning the EU can conclude it.

Lebanon will appoint a Liaison Prosecutor to Eurojust, and the agreement includes data protection safeguards.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the Agreement between the EU and Lebanon on Eurojust cooperation, which aims to enhance judicial cooperation and exchange operational information to combat serious cross-border crime.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/0155(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure

Conclusion of an Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon on the cooperation between the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and the authorities of the Republic of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 3 July 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 27 January 2026 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 6 May 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 7 May 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 20 May 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 3 July 2026 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteur: Jaroslav BŽOCH (Patriots)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 2 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “EU-Lebanon Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters”. Decision, 20 May 2026. votingId 192445, document A-10-2026-0132, reference 2024/0155(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/4 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-20-4,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{EU-Lebanon Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal matters}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/4}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/4},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 192445, document A-10-2026-0132, reference 2024/0155(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}