Skip to content

Decision

Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade

Effect
Adopted
Result
527 for · 62 against · 59 abstained roll call
Date
20 May 2026, 13:45
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Brando Benifei
Topics
Digital, AI & dataTrade & customsEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
192450
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 527 for, 62 against, 59 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 19Abst. 21No vote 2 of 45Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
GreensFor 47Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 159Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 68Against 8Abst. 0No vote 5 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 51Against 7Abst. 19No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 5Against 4Abst. 17No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 12

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria130610.53
Belgium191110.86
Bulgaria102050.75
Cyprus2004—
Czechia181200.79
Germany66151050.59
Denmark131100.80
Estonia5002—
Spain4111080.68
Finland120210.79
France628290.79
Greece125220.45
Croatia110011.00
Hungary51850.36
Ireland110300.68
Italy589180.78
Lithuania101000.86
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia9000—
Malta2004—
Netherlands246100.66
Poland483020.91
Portugal181110.85
Romania252150.84
Sweden153210.63
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia52620.19

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Brando BENIFEI ItalyS&DSpeeches219 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches219 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Romana JERKOVIĆ CroatiaS&DSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Krzysztof HETMAN PolandEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alexandra GEESE GermanyGreensSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Show the other 18 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Jüri RATAS EstoniaEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sergey LAGODINSKY GermanyGreensSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Barry ANDREWS IrelandRenewSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Miriam LEXMANN SlovakiaEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Rihards KOLS LatviaECRSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Martine KEMP LuxembourgEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria GUZENINA FinlandS&DSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group CzechiaECRSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Aleksandar NIKOLIC FrancePatriotsSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ PolandEPPSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ana VASCONCELOS PortugalRenewSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECRSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michael MCNAMARA IrelandRenewSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches119 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution A10-0122/2026 – Brando Benifei – Motion for a resolution Roll call527 for, 62 against, 59 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0122

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The resolution sets out Parliament's position on a comprehensive EU strategy for artificial intelligence in trade, covering both AI deployment for competitiveness and trade in AI inputs.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position, endorsing an integrated approach that combines openness with resilience and rule-shaping.

It calls for action to support AI adoption, secure critical inputs like semiconductors, and promote international cooperation, including through the WTO.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution on an EU AI trade strategy calls for integrating AI into trade policy to boost competitiveness, enforce rules, and secure strategic autonomy.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2112(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 20 May 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 19 June 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 16 April 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 27 April 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 20 May 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: INTA · Author: Brando BENIFEI (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 15 connections: Running issue: EU competitiveness · Running issue: EU economic security · Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Running issue: EU economic security

Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade”. Decision, 20 May 2026. votingId 192450, document A-10-2026-0122, reference 2025/2112(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-20/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-20-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-20/12},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 192450, document A-10-2026-0122, reference 2025/2112(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}