Skip to content

Decision

Extension of the timeframe for the establishment of the Eurojust case management system

Effect
Passed
Result
634 for · 4 against · 29 abstained roll call
Date
10 September 2025, 14:21
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Javier Zarzalejos
Topics
Justice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
178401
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 634 for, 4 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 176Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 6No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 5Against 0Abst. 21No vote 1 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 25Against 4Abst. 1No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 12

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria140600.55
Belgium190031.00
Bulgaria120320.70
Cyprus6000—
Czechia210001.00
Germany7901430.77
Denmark140011.00
Estonia6001—
Spain570031.00
Finland120031.00
France770041.00
Greece162210.70
Croatia120001.00
Hungary190110.93
Ireland120021.00
Italy670091.00
Lithuania90110.85
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia9000—
Malta5001—
Netherlands260051.00
Poland471050.97
Portugal160051.00
Romania321000.95
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia9000—
Slovakia110220.77

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches110 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A10-0152/2025 - Javier Zarzalejos - Proposition de la Commission Roll call634 for, 4 against, 29 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0152

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament adopted its position on a proposed regulation to extend the timeframe for setting up the Eurojust case management system.

The position takes over the Commission proposal, meaning Parliament agrees to the extension as proposed.

Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it makes substantial changes, and instructs its President to forward the position to the Council, Commission, and national parliaments.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal to extend the timeframe for establishing the Eurojust case management system.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0074(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 as regards the extension of the timeframe for the establishment of the Eurojust case management system

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 15 October 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 5 May 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 15 July 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 24 July 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 10 September 2025 (done)
  5. Negotiations with the Council (done)
  6. Published as law · 15 October 2025 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteur: Javier ZARZALEJOS (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 1 connection: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Extension of the timeframe for the establishment of the Eurojust case management system”. Decision, 10 September 2025. votingId 178401, document A-10-2025-0152, reference 2025/0074(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-09-10-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Extension of the timeframe for the establishment of the Eurojust case management system}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 178401, document A-10-2025-0152, reference 2025/0074(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}