Skip to content

Decision

Hong Kong, notably the cases of Jimmy Lai and the 45 activists recently convicted under the national security law

Effect
Adopted
Result
473 for · 23 against · 98 abstained roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:13
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
9 votes · 1 roll call
Requested by
The Left (1 split vote) · Renew (1 roll call)
Final vote
170875
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 473 for, 23 against, 98 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted). 5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; The Left, Patriots and ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 13Abst. 16No vote 10 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.17
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 3No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 115Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 150Against 0Abst. 1No vote 37 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 5No vote 10 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 22Against 1Abst. 40No vote 23 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ESNFor 0Against 0Abst. 23No vote 2 of 25Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 9Abst. 10No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 9

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria90470.54
Belgium190120.93
Bulgaria80360.59
Cyprus4101—
Czechia163110.70
Germany61221120.59
Denmark120031.00
Estonia7000—
Spain491550.84
Finland130021.00
France4003470.31
Greece101730.33
Croatia110011.00
Hungary20118—
Ireland5018—
Italy5081170.77
Lithuania100100.86
Luxembourg3012—
Latvia5013—
Malta5001—
Netherlands210550.71
Poland451520.82
Portugal181110.85
Romania1603140.76
Sweden200011.00
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia75210.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 594 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

No plenary speech is linked to this dossier.

All votes on this decision, 9

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3 Counted237 for, 170 against, 181 abstained Adopted
2Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the EEAS and the Member States to warn China that its actions in HK will have consequences for EU-China relations; calls on the Council to review its 2020 conclusions on HK and to impose targeted sanctions on John Lee and other HK and Chinese officials responsible for human rights violations, to revoke HK’s favourable customs treatment and review the status of the HK Economic Trade Office in Brussels;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
3Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘urges the Member States to file an ICJ case against China’s decision to impose the NSL on HK and Macau;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
Show the other 8 votesShow the other 6 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the EEAS and the Member States to warn China that its actions in HK will have consequences for EU-China relations; calls on the Council to review its 2020 conclusions on HK and to impose targeted sanctions on John Lee and other HK and Chinese officials responsible for human rights violations, to revoke HK’s favourable customs treatment and review the status of the HK Economic Trade Office in Brussels;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
3Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘urges the Member States to file an ICJ case against China’s decision to impose the NSL on HK and Macau;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0208/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call473 for, 23 against, 98 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
5Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0208/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
6Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0209/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
7Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0210/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
8Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0211/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
9Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0212/2024 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll call requested by Renew · split votes by The Left.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2024-0212

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on Hong Kong, focusing on the cases of Jimmy Lai and 45 activists convicted under the national security law.

The text condemns their imprisonment and demands their immediate and unconditional release, along with all others detained for exercising freedoms.

It also urges the repeal of the national security laws and calls for sanctions against Hong Kong and Chinese officials.

Parliament asks the EU to monitor human rights abuses and review the status of Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The resolution condemns the imprisonment of Jimmy Lai and the sentencing of 45 activists in Hong Kong under the national security law, and demands their release.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2950(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 28 November 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 28 November 2024 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 6 connections: Running issue: Hong Kong · Running issue: Hong Kong National Security Law

Running issue: Hong Kong

Running issue: Hong Kong National Security Law

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Hong Kong, notably the cases of Jimmy Lai and the 45 activists recently convicted under the national security law”. Decision, 28 November 2024. votingId 170875, document B-10-2024-0212, reference 2024/2950(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-28/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-11-28-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Hong Kong, notably the cases of Jimmy Lai and the 45 activists recently convicted under the national security law}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-28/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-11-28/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 170875, document B-10-2024-0212, reference 2024/2950(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}