Skip to content

Decision

Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements

Effect
Passed
Result
530 for · 36 against · 14 abstained roll call
Date
24 April 2024, 18:43
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (7)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Jonás Fernández
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
168559
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 530 for, 36 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots; ESN split.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 11Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
GreensFor 28Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
S&DFor 53Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 34Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 82Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 21Against 2Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
PatriotsFor 6Against 12Abst. 4Majority line AgainstClear line Divided
ESNFor 0Against 2Abst. 2Majority line TieClear line Divided
No groupFor 3Against 1Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 580 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A9-0076/2024 - Jonás Fernández - Proposition de la Commission et amendement Roll call530 for, 36 against, 14 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-9-2024-0076

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation narrows the scope of benchmark rules to critical, significant, EU Climate Transition and EU Paris-aligned benchmarks, and commodity benchmarks under Annex II. It sets procedures for designating significant benchmarks, requires administrators to seek authorisation or registration, and restricts use of non-compliant benchmarks.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/0379(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 19 May 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 3 April 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 8 April 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 10 April 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Voted 6 May 2025 (done)
  5. Negotiations with the Council · Deal approved in committee 16 January 2025 (done)
  6. Published as law · 19 May 2025 (done)

Lead committee: ECON · Rapporteur: Jonás FERNÁNDEZ (S&D)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements”. Decision, 24 April 2024. votingId 168559, document A-9-2024-0076, reference 2023/0379(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-24/35 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-04-24/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-04-24-35,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-24/35}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-24/35},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 168559, document A-9-2024-0076, reference 2023/0379(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}