Decision
2022 discharge: EU general budget - Court of Auditors
- Effect
- Passed
- Result
- 578 for · 19 against · 1 abstained roll call
- Date
- 11 April 2024, 13:00–13:01
- Kind
- Budget decision
More facts (8)
- Margin
- by an overwhelming majority
- Text
- Report A-9-2024-0074
- Dossier
- 2023-2133
- Source
- Committee report by Luke Ming Flanagan
- Votes
- 5 votes · 3 roll calls
- Requested by
- S&D (1 roll call) · ID (1 roll call, 1 split vote)
- Sitting
- Thursday 11 April 2024
- Final vote
- 168005
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 578 for, 19 against, 1 abstained (roll call).
Passed by an overwhelming majority.
The budget decision was approved.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted).
Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.
Groups
Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | Majority line | Clear line | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 12 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Greens | For 24 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| S&D | For 60 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Renew | For 39 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| EPP | For 79 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| ECR | For 25 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Patriots | For 17 | Against 7 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| ESN | For 3 | Against 1 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| No group | For 3 | Against 2 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line Divided |
Voted against their group, 0
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
The breakdown by country is not available right now.
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Debate speakers and how they voted
The debate speakers are not available right now.
All votes on this decision, 5
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Final vote A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Proposal for a decision | Roll call | 578 for, 19 against, 1 abstained Adopted | |
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 | Counted | 425 for, 159 against, 12 abstained Adopted | |
| 3 | Separate vote on paragraph 15 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ID |
| 4 | Paragraph 15 — part 2 A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 15/2 Part voted on: ‘is concerned that, for the audit work concerning the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), the Court still does not have full access to the new reporting tool on RRF, FENIX, and that the information in that new tool is not updated in a timely manner; supports the Court’s view that Article 257 of the Financial Regulation provides for full and immediate access rights for the Court; further calls on the Commission to grant access to the Court to other types of relevant information in order to fulfil its role;’ | Roll call | 570 for, 4 against, 26 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ID; split: ID |
| 5 | Final vote — text as a whole A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Roll call | 583 for, 10 against, 8 abstained Adopted |
Show the other 4 votesShow the other 0 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 | Counted | 425 for, 159 against, 12 abstained Adopted | |
| 3 | Separate vote on paragraph 15 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: ID |
| 4 | Paragraph 15 — part 2 A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – § 15/2 Part voted on: ‘is concerned that, for the audit work concerning the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), the Court still does not have full access to the new reporting tool on RRF, FENIX, and that the information in that new tool is not updated in a timely manner; supports the Court’s view that Article 257 of the Financial Regulation provides for full and immediate access rights for the Court; further calls on the Commission to grant access to the Court to other types of relevant information in order to fulfil its role;’ | Roll call | 570 for, 4 against, 26 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: ID; split: ID |
| 5 | Final vote — text as a whole A9-0074/2024 – Luke Ming Flanagan – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) | Roll call | 583 for, 10 against, 8 abstained Adopted |
Roll calls requested by S&D, ID · split votes by ID.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge for the 2022 budget and sets out observations in a resolution.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2023/2133(DEC) · Discharge procedure
2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Auditors
Completed: published in the Official Journal on 10 October 2024 and now EU law.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 12 September 2023 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 22 February 2024 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 7 March 2024 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 11 April 2024 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteur: Luke Ming FLANAGAN (The Left)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
No connections found for this decision.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “2022 discharge: EU general budget - Court of Auditors”. Decision, 11 April 2024. votingId 168005, document A-9-2024-0074, reference 2023-2133. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/9 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-04-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-04-11-9,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{2022 discharge: EU general budget - Court of Auditors}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-04-11},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/9}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/9},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 168005, document A-9-2024-0074, reference 2023-2133. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}