Decision

2022 discharge: EU general budget - European Parliament

Effect: Passed
Result: 527 for · 73 against · 11 abstained roll call
Date: 11 April 2024, 12:38–12:57
Kind: Budget decision

More facts (8)

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Report A-9-2024-0067
Dossier: 2023-2130
Source: Committee report by Andrey Novakov
Votes: 101 votes · 34 roll calls · 29 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · Renew (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · EPP (1 roll call, 9 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ID (1 roll call)
Sitting: Thursday 11 April 2024
Final vote: 168154

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Report A-9-2024-0067
Dossier: 2023-2130
Source: Committee report by Andrey Novakov
Votes: 101 votes · 34 roll calls · 29 amendments
Requested by: The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · Renew (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · EPP (1 roll call, 9 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ID (1 roll call)
Sitting: Thursday 11 April 2024
Final vote: 168154

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

The budget decision was approved.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 29 amendments (16 adopted, 13 rejected) and 70 parts of the text voted on separately (35 adopted, 32 rejected, 3 lapsed).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
Group	For	Against	Abst.	Majority line	Clear line
The Left	For 11	Against 1	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
Greens	For 26	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
S&D	For 61	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
Renew	For 38	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
EPP	For 80	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
ECR	For 22	Against 3	Abst. 1	Majority line For	Clear line For
Patriots	For 4	Against 22	Abst. 0	Majority line Against	Clear line Against
ESN	For 0	Against 4	Abst. 0	Majority line Against	Clear line Against
No group	For 2	Against 3	Abst. 0	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 611 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 101

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result
1	Final vote A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – Proposal for a decision	Roll call	527 for, 73 against, 11 abstained Adopted
2	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
3	Separate vote on paragraph 21	Show of hands	Rejected

Show the other 100 votesShow the other 98 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Separate vote on paragraph 20	Show of hands	Rejected
3	Separate vote on paragraph 21	Show of hands	Rejected

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Separate vote on paragraph 21	Counted	289 for, 256 against, 64 abstained Adopted
5	Separate vote on paragraph 25	Show of hands	Rejected
6	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 26	Show of hands	Rejected
7	Amendment 35 to paragraph 30 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 30 – Am 35	Roll call	137 for, 468 against, 4 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ID
8	Separate vote on paragraph 31	Show of hands	Rejected
9	Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 34 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 34 – Am 48	Roll call	531 for, 25 against, 39 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
10	Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 35 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 35 – Am 37	Roll call	259 for, 330 against, 20 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ID
11	Separate vote on paragraph 36	Show of hands	Rejected
12	Separate vote on paragraph 36	Show of hands	Rejected
13	Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 37 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 37 – Am 13	Roll call	588 for, 10 against, 14 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP
14	Paragraph 38 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Considers roll call votes (RCV) to be a key instrument for transparency and accountability towards the Union’s citizens;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
15	Paragraph 38 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “calls for introducing automatic RCV to any final vote except for secret ballots, and for increasing the number of RCV that are possible for a political group to ask for per part-session in Rule 190(2), or exempting legislative files from that limitation;”	Counted	407 for, 183 against, 3 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
16	Paragraph 40 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Recalls the changes in Parliament’s Rules of Procedure on 20 December 2020 allowing for remote voting and the fact that voting remotely in committee is currently not allowed unless the President establishes the existence of extraordinary circumstances;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
17	Paragraph 40 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “reiterates its request to the Bureau, adopted at Plenary level on several occasions, to enable Members to exercise their right to vote remotely while benefiting from maternity or paternity leave, during a long term illness or in cases of force majeure, thus capitalising on the great administrative effort and financial investment that Parliament has made in technical solutions to allow remote voting;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
18	Separate vote on paragraph 42	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew, EPP
19	Paragraph 42 — part 2 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 42/2 Part voted on: ‘recalls the support by the vast majority of Parliament for a single seat to ensure efficient spending of Union taxpayers’ money and to assume its institutional responsibility to reduce its carbon footprint; notes that permanent changes would require a Treaty change;’	Roll call	464 for, 113 against, 38 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Renew, EPP
20	Separate vote on paragraph 43 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 43	Roll call	420 for, 136 against, 54 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; separate: Renew
21	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 45 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 45 – Am 3	Roll call	537 for, 40 against, 29 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
22	Separate vote on paragraph 46	Show of hands	Rejected
23	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 53 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 53 – Am 4	Roll call	466 for, 96 against, 45 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
24	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 54	Show of hands	Rejected
25	Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 54 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 54 – Am 41	Roll call	145 for, 460 against, 3 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ID
26	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 55 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 55 – Am 5	Roll call	520 for, 50 against, 41 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
27	Amendment 21 to paragraph 61 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 61 – Am 21	Roll call	245 for, 359 against, 8 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
28	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 61	Show of hands	Rejected
29	Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 61 – Am 22	Roll call	254 for, 343 against, 13 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
30	Separate vote on paragraph 64	Show of hands	Rejected
31	Separate vote on paragraph 64	Counted	396 for, 198 against, 13 abstained Adopted
32	Separate vote on paragraph 66	Show of hands	Rejected
33	Separate vote on paragraph 66	Counted	362 for, 191 against, 42 abstained Adopted
34	Separate vote on paragraph 67	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: EPP
35	Separate vote on paragraph 68	Counted	248 for, 283 against, 72 abstained Rejected	Requested byseparate: Renew
36	Separate vote on paragraph 69	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: EPP
37	Separate vote on paragraph 71	Counted	250 for, 180 against, 176 abstained Adopted	Requested byseparate: Renew
38	Paragraph 76 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Notes that out of the 459 Members of the 8th parliamentary term, who were not re-elected in 2019, only a single notification of post-mandate employment was submitted to Parliament (Article 6 of the Code of Conduct); welcomes the prohibition for former Members to engage in lobbying activities during the six months after the end of their mandate and the introduction of a procedure in the event of non-compliance; applauds that it is no longer possible to issue a lobbyist badge to a former Member within the six-month period following the end of their mandate and that their former Member badge is deactivated if a lobbyist badge is issued to the former Member after this period; notes that in 2022, out of the 199 officials who left service, 65 requested permission for an activity after leaving the service (Article 16 of the Staff Regulations)”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
39	Paragraph 76 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “calls on Parliament to establish stronger rules to regulate revolving doors for Members and civil servants;”	Counted	314 for, 202 against, 87 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
40	Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 76 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 76 – Am 6	Roll call	547 for, 12 against, 38 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
41	Separate vote on paragraph 79	Show of hands	Rejected
42	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 79	Show of hands	Rejected
43	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 79	Show of hands	Rejected
44	Paragraph 81 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Welcomes DG INLO’s commitment to putting in place environmentally sustainable solutions; notes that, in 2022, Parliament generated over 19 % of its own energy from renewable sources; welcomes the conduction of a study on on-site electricity production in Strasbourg in 2022 and the subsequent and ongoing implementation of 1 400 m2 of photovoltaic panels on the PFLIMLIN, DE MADARIAGA, and CHURCHILL buildings; ’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
45	Paragraph 81 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Stresses that Parliament could share this energy with the city of Strasbourg when Parliament’s premises are mostly empty; calls on the Bureau to also consider renting the roofs’ surfaces to external users for the installation of solar panels and thereby use it as an additional source of income for Parliament;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
46	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 86	Show of hands	Adopted
47	Separate vote on paragraph 88	Counted	323 for, 256 against, 29 abstained Adopted
48	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 93	Show of hands	Rejected
49	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 93	Show of hands	Rejected
50	Separate vote on paragraph 94	Show of hands	Adopted
51	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 95	Show of hands	Rejected
52	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 96	Show of hands	Rejected
53	Paragraph 98 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Notes that in 2022, after the COVID-related capacity restrictions were lifted, the offer of seats in the service fleet going on Mondays from Brussels to Strasbourg was 250 places and that per part-session week in 2022, on average 162 seats or 65% of seats available in the fleet were occupied”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
54	Paragraph 98 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘reiterates its call on Parliament’s administration to widen the use of seats while making sure that Members’ seats are secured to avoid wastage of resources;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
55	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 98	Show of hands	Rejected
56	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 102	Counted	339 for, 233 against, 28 abstained Adopted
57	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 105	Counted	197 for, 364 against, 38 abstained Rejected
58	Separate vote on paragraph 107	Show of hands	Rejected
59	Separate vote on paragraph 109	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: S&D
60	Separate vote on paragraph 109	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: S&D
61	Separate vote on paragraph 109	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: S&D
62	Separate vote on paragraph 111	Show of hands	Adopted
63	Paragraph 117 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘now due to a myriad of administrational requests resulting in double checks and unclear requirements’ and ‘which should not warrant unnecessary checks’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew
64	Paragraph 117 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “now due to a myriad of administrational requests resulting in double checks and unclear requirements”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew
65	Paragraph 117 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “which should not warrant unnecessary checks”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew
66	Separate vote on paragraph 124	Show of hands	Rejected
67	Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 124 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 124 – Am 67	Roll call	275 for, 301 against, 36 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
68	Separate vote on paragraph 126	Counted	204 for, 359 against, 35 abstained Rejected
69	Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 126 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 126 – Am 59	Roll call	269 for, 291 against, 42 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
70	Amendment 60 to paragraph 127 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 127 – Am 60	Roll call	220 for, 344 against, 39 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
71	Amendment 15 to paragraph 129 — part 1 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 129 – Am 15/1 Part voted on: “highlights that Members are protected by the non-liability for votes cast and opinions expressed in the performance of their duties and the protection from prosecutions and restrictions of their personal freedom during the sessions of the European Parliament”	Roll call	530 for, 69 against, 8 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: S&D
72	Amendment 15 to paragraph 129 — part 2 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 129 – Am 15/2 Part voted on: ‘recalls that OLAF can only enter Members’ offices after the President of the European Parliament grants access following a request issued by a responsible authority of a Member States, in most cases a judge; recalls that OLAF needs to respect these limits in the observance of its duties and investigations and stresses that alleged misconduct cannot be used as a pretext to request direct access’	Roll call	402 for, 184 against, 13 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: S&D
73	Separate vote on paragraph 129	Show of hands	Rejected
74	Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 131 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 131 – Am 26	Roll call	64 for, 481 against, 61 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
75	Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 131 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 131 – Am 27	Roll call	58 for, 507 against, 37 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: The Left
76	Separate vote on paragraph 135	Show of hands	Adopted
77	Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 140 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 140 – Am 16	Roll call	601 for, 7 against, 4 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP
78	Paragraph 141 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Welcomes the fact that the Digital Signature Portal (DiSP) allows Members to digitally sign documents, which improves efficiency, traceability and transparency to the procedures,”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
79	Paragraph 141 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “notes that, regardless of the possibility to send signed plenary AMs to the plenary services by email or via the EP Transfer portal, signing plenary amendments is still an outdated and burdensome procedure; calls on the Bureau to take the necessary steps for introducing the possibility for Members to sign plenary amendments digitally in the future;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
80	Separate vote on paragraph 150	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
81	Separate vote on paragraph 150	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: EPP
82	Separate vote on paragraph 150	Show of hands	Lapsed	Requested bysplit: EPP
83	Separate vote on paragraph 152	Counted	343 for, 238 against, 21 abstained Adopted
84	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 152 — part 1 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 152 – Am 17/1 Part voted on: ‘Stresses that sexual and psychological harassment are not acceptable under any circumstances; recalls that Parliament has successfully installed several contact points to deal with harassment cases, like the Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints concerning Members, and the Advisory Committee on Harassment and its prevention at the workplace as well as confidential counsellors; is very concerned by media revelations of alleged sexual harassment by a Member since summer 2022 without action taken’, without the words: ‘successfully’ and ‘without action taken’	Roll call	553 for, 7 against, 51 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens
85	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 152 — part 2 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 152 – Am 17/2 Part voted on: “successfully”	Roll call	305 for, 229 against, 62 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens
86	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 152 — part 3 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 152 – Am 17/3 Part voted on: “without action taken”	Roll call	440 for, 93 against, 67 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens
87	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 152 — part 4 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 152 – Am 17/4 Part voted on: ‘recalls that all political groups are strongly encouraged to report potential cases to these committees and that establishing external structures with the same purpose lead to circumventing Parliament’s anti-harassment protocol and establish a two-tier system; underlines that this leads to grave uncertainty for victims and establishes different rules for different political parties;’	Roll call	331 for, 199 against, 74 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP; split: Greens
88	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 152	Show of hands	Rejected
89	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 152	Counted	240 for, 302 against, 60 abstained Rejected
90	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 154	Show of hands	Rejected
91	Paragraph 155 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Recalls that staff members of the Union institutions have an obligation to report any information pointing to corruption, fraud and other serious irregularities that they discover in the line of duty; notes that Parliament recorded one case of whistleblowing in 2022; welcomes the ongoing work in 2022 to update the Internal Rules Implementing Article 22(c) of the Staff Regulations of 4 December 2015 with more comprehensive and detailed internal rules; welcome that a Bureau decision regarding the internal rules on whistleblowing was adopted on 20 November 2023 and applies from 1 December 2023; including provisions for the protection of whistleblowers, transmission of evidence to OLAF and, if appropriate, EPPO as well as deadlines for the handling of complaints;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
92	Paragraph 155 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “regrets, however, that these rules are still not aligned to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council;”	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: EPP
93	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 156	Counted	289 for, 289 against, 26 abstained Rejected
94	Amendment 28 to paragraph 159 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 159 – Am 28	Roll call	150 for, 402 against, 57 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: EPP, The Left
95	Amendment 18 to paragraph 159 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – § 159 – Am 18	Roll call	507 for, 62 against, 38 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: EPP
96	Separate vote on paragraph 159	Roll call	0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed	Requested byroll call: EPP
97	Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 159 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 159 – Am 66	Roll call	187 for, 352 against, 55 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: EPP
98	Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 170 A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After § 170 – Am 49	Roll call	141 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ID
99	Amendment 1, adding text after recital C A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After recital C – Am 1	Roll call	527 for, 25 against, 51 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
100	Amendment 47, adding text after recital C A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – After recital C – Am 47	Roll call	426 for, 142 against, 31 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Renew
101	Final vote — text as a whole A9-0067/2024 – Andrey Novakov – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)	Roll call	499 for, 69 against, 47 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ID · split votes by Greens, S&D (2), Renew (2), EPP (9) · separate votes by Renew, EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-9-2024-0067

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The Committee on Budgetary Control proposes that Parliament grant its President discharge for the implementation of Parliament's 2022 budget, and sets out its observations in an accompanying resolution.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/2130(DEC) · Discharge procedure

2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Parliament

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 10 October 2024 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 12 September 2023 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 22 February 2024 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 1 March 2024 (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 11 April 2024 (done)
Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteur: Andrey NOVAKOV (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/7
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-11
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “2022 discharge: EU general budget - European Parliament”. Decision, 11 April 2024. votingId 168154, document A-9-2024-0067, reference 2023-2130. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/7 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 April 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-04-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2024-04-11-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{2022 discharge: EU general budget - European Parliament}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-04-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-04-11/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 168154, document A-9-2024-0067, reference 2023-2130. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-04-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-04-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}