Skip to content

Decision

The immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries

Effect
Adopted
Result
372 for · 44 against · 120 abstained roll call
Date
14 March 2024, 12:08–12:16
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Dossier
2024-2616
Source
Motion for a resolution
Votes
39 votes · 28 roll calls · 26 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · MEPs (1 roll call)
Final vote
166777
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 372 for, 44 against, 120 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 26 amendments (6 adopted, 20 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 4 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; ECR, Patriots and ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 9Against 0Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
GreensFor 26Against 0Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
S&DFor 52Against 0Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 30Against 4Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 66Against 3Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 1Against 5Abst. 16Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained
PatriotsFor 0Against 4Abst. 17Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained
ESNFor 0Against 0Abst. 4Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained
No groupFor 2Against 0Abst. 3Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 536 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 39

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
2Amendment 23 to paragraph 1 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 1 – Am 23 Roll call259 for, 230 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
Show the other 38 votesShow the other 36 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 23 to paragraph 1 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 1 – Am 23 Roll call259 for, 230 against, 16 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendments 6 + 27 (voted as one) to paragraph 3 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 3 – Am 6= 27= Roll call460 for, 20 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: MEPs
5Amendment 19 to paragraph 3 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 3 – Am 19 Roll call72 for, 401 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
6Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 3 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 3 – Am 24 Roll call155 for, 324 against, 45 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
7Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 1 Roll call251 for, 263 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
8Amendment 17 to paragraph 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 17 Roll call261 for, 243 against, 26 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
9Amendment 25 to paragraph 4 — part 1 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 25/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the deletion of the word: ‘immediate’ and the word ‘Israeli’ (two occurrences)”Roll call351 for, 168 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR; split: ECR, Greens
10Amendment 25 to paragraph 4 — part 2 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 25/2 Part voted on: “deletion of: ‘immediate’”Roll call253 for, 261 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR; split: ECR, Greens
11Amendment 25 to paragraph 4 — part 3 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 25/3 Part voted on: ‘Israeli’ (first occurrence)Roll call238 for, 277 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR; split: ECR, Greens
12Amendment 25 to paragraph 4 — part 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 4 – Am 25/4 Part voted on: ‘Israeli’ (second occurrence)Roll call240 for, 279 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, ECR; split: ECR, Greens
13Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 4 – Am 8 Roll call94 for, 404 against, 35 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: MEPs
14Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 4 – Am 16 Roll call95 for, 401 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
15Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 4 – Am 7/1 Part voted on: ‘Calls on the European External Action Service and the Commission to review Israel’s compliance with its obligations under the EU-Israel Association Agreement;’Roll call248 for, 266 against, 23 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: MEPs; split: S&D
16Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 2 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 4 – Am 7/2 Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission and Council to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement in view of Israel’s repeated breaches of international humanitarian law and international human rights law;’Roll call126 for, 379 against, 24 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: MEPs; split: S&D
17Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 4 – Am 12 Roll call83 for, 399 against, 49 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
18Separate vote on paragraph 5 Counted231 for, 260 against, 40 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: ECR
19Separate vote on paragraph 5 Counted233 for, 285 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested bysplit: ECR
20Separate vote on paragraph 5 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
21Paragraph 5 — part 2 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 5/2 Part voted on: “recognises the indispensable role of UNRWA in the region;”Roll call374 for, 127 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
22Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 5 – Am 18 Roll call266 for, 250 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
23Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 6 – Am 3 Roll call248 for, 268 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
24Amendment 14 to paragraph 6 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 6 – Am 14 Roll call199 for, 307 against, 29 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
25Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 6 – Am 4 Roll call264 for, 241 against, 29 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
26Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 6 – Am 15 Roll call112 for, 381 against, 47 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
27Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 6 – Am 5 Roll call250 for, 256 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
28Amendment 20 to paragraph 7 RC-B9-0187/2024 – § 7 – Am 20 Roll call242 for, 263 against, 34 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
29Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 7 RC-B9-0187/2024 – After § 7 – Am 26 Roll call207 for, 189 against, 147 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
30Amendment 21, adding text after recital A RC-B9-0187/2024 – After recital A – Am 21 Roll call222 for, 290 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
31Amendment 22 to recital D RC-B9-0187/2024 – Recital D – Am 22 Roll call243 for, 283 against, 19 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
32Amendment 9, adding text after recital D RC-B9-0187/2024 – After recital D – Am 9 Roll call225 for, 294 against, 22 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
33Final vote — text as a whole RC-B9-0187/2024 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call372 for, 44 against, 120 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
34Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0186/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
35Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0187/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
36Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0189/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
37Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0190/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
38Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0191/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
39Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0192/2024 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, ECR, MEPs · split votes by Greens, S&D, ECR (2).

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-9-2024-0192

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

A motion for a resolution on the immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries. It condemns Hamas's attacks on Israel and calls for the release of all hostages.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2616(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 14 March 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 14 March 2024 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “The immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries”. Decision, 14 March 2024. votingId 166777, document B-9-2024-0192, reference 2024-2616. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-14/9 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 14 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-14-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 14 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-14-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-14, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-03-14/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-03-14-9,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The immediate risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the attacks on humanitarian aid deliveries}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-03-14},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-14/9}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-14/9},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 166777, document B-9-2024-0192, reference 2024-2616. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-14-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-14-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-14 (CC BY 4.0)}
}