Skip to content

Decision

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)

Effect
Passed
Result
467 for · 65 against · 74 abstained roll call
Date
12 March 2024, 13:37–13:40
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Dossier
2023-0085
Source
Committee report by Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip
Votes
30 votes · 4 roll calls · 2 amendments
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · Renew (1 separate vote) · EPP (1 separate vote) · ECR (1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · ID (1 roll call)
Final vote
166226
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 467 for, 65 against, 74 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 adopted) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 5 rejected, 8 lapsed).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ESN; ECR mostly abstained; Patriots split.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 12Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
GreensFor 28Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
S&DFor 62Against 0Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 31Against 0Abst. 5Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 81Against 1Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 1Against 10Abst. 13Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided
PatriotsFor 10Against 10Abst. 6Majority line TieClear line Divided
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
No groupFor 1Against 3Abst. 2Majority line AgainstClear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 606 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 30

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Adopted
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
Show the other 29 votesShow the other 27 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
5Amendment 48 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 48 Roll call466 for, 129 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
6Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote Show of hands Adopted
7Amendment 145 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 145 Roll call454 for, 110 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
8Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k Counted318 for, 280 against, 4 abstained Adopted
9Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k Show of hands Lapsed
10Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h Show of hands Adopted
11Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h Show of hands Lapsed
12Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h Show of hands Adopted
13Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h Show of hands Lapsed
14Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
15Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
16Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
17Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
18Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
19Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
20Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
21Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Rejected
22Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 Show of hands Adopted
23Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 4 Show of hands Adopted
24Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
25Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 Show of hands Rejected
26Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
27Separate vote on recital 32 Show of hands Adopted
28Separate vote on recital 32 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
29Vote on text inserted after recital 68 Counted209 for, 315 against, 80 abstained Rejected
30Final vote A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Commission proposal Roll call467 for, 65 against, 74 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, ID · split votes by ECR · separate votes by Renew, EPP, ECR.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-9-2024-0056

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the Commission proposal for a Green Claims Directive requires traders to substantiate and communicate explicit environmental claims, and to have them verified before publication.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/0085(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Parliament adopted its position on 12 March 2024. Negotiations with the Council on a common text are under way (last trilogue 24 April 2025).

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 1 June 2023 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 14 February 2024 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 23 February 2024 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 12 March 2024 (done)
  5. Negotiations with the Council · Trilogue 24 April 2025 (current stage)
  6. Published as law (to come)

Lead committee: ENVI · Rapporteurs: Delara BURKHARDT (S&D), MEP #209091 (S&D), MEP #124696 (Renew), Sandro GOZI (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)”. Decision, 12 March 2024. votingId 166226, document A-9-2024-0056, reference 2023-0085. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-03-12/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-03-12-9,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 166226, document A-9-2024-0056, reference 2023-0085. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}