Decision
Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)
- Effect
- Passed
- Result
- 467 for · 65 against · 74 abstained roll call
- Date
- 12 March 2024, 13:37–13:40
- Kind
- New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (8)
- Margin
- by a large majority
- Text
- Report A-9-2024-0056
- Dossier
- 2023-0085
- Source
- Committee report by Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip
- Votes
- 30 votes · 4 roll calls · 2 amendments
- Requested by
- Greens (1 roll call) · Renew (1 separate vote) · EPP (1 separate vote) · ECR (1 split vote, 1 separate vote) · ID (1 roll call)
- Sitting
- Tuesday 12 March 2024
- Final vote
- 166226
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 467 for, 65 against, 74 abstained (roll call).
Passed by a large majority.
Parliament adopted its position on the law.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 adopted) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 5 rejected, 8 lapsed).
Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ESN; ECR mostly abstained; Patriots split.
Groups
Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | Majority line | Clear line | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 12 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Greens | For 28 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| S&D | For 62 | Against 0 | Abst. 1 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Renew | For 31 | Against 0 | Abst. 5 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| EPP | For 81 | Against 1 | Abst. 2 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| ECR | For 1 | Against 10 | Abst. 13 | Majority line Abstained | Clear line Divided | |
| Patriots | For 10 | Against 10 | Abst. 6 | Majority line Tie | Clear line Divided | |
| ESN | For 0 | Against 4 | Abst. 0 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | |
| No group | For 1 | Against 3 | Abst. 2 | Majority line Against | Clear line Divided |
Voted against their group, 0
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
The breakdown by country is not available right now.
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Debate speakers and how they voted
The debate speakers are not available right now.
All votes on this decision, 30
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 2 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted |
Show the other 29 votesShow the other 27 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 3 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 5 | Amendment 48 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 48 | Roll call | 466 for, 129 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 6 | Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 7 | Amendment 145 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 145 | Roll call | 454 for, 110 against, 44 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 8 | Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k | Counted | 318 for, 280 against, 4 abstained Adopted | |
| 9 | Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 10 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 11 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 12 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 13 | Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 14 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 15 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 16 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 17 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 18 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 19 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 20 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Lapsed | |
| 21 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 22 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 23 | Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 4 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 24 | Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 25 | Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 26 | Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 | Show of hands | Rejected | |
| 27 | Separate vote on recital 32 | Show of hands | Adopted | |
| 28 | Separate vote on recital 32 | Roll call | 0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed | |
| 29 | Vote on text inserted after recital 68 | Counted | 209 for, 315 against, 80 abstained Rejected | |
| 30 | Final vote A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Commission proposal | Roll call | 467 for, 65 against, 74 abstained Adopted |
Roll calls requested by Greens, ID · split votes by ECR · separate votes by Renew, EPP, ECR.
Text
The text voted on.
AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
Parliament's amended version of the Commission proposal for a Green Claims Directive requires traders to substantiate and communicate explicit environmental claims, and to have them verified before publication.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2023/0085(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure
Parliament adopted its position on 12 March 2024. Negotiations with the Council on a common text are under way (last trilogue 24 April 2025).
Show the 6 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 1 June 2023 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 14 February 2024 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 23 February 2024 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 12 March 2024 (done)
- Negotiations with the Council · Trilogue 24 April 2025 (current stage)
- Published as law (to come)
Lead committee: ENVI · Rapporteurs: Delara BURKHARDT (S&D), MEP #209091 (S&D), MEP #124696 (Renew), Sandro GOZI (Renew)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
No connections found for this decision.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)”. Decision, 12 March 2024. votingId 166226, document A-9-2024-0056, reference 2023-0085. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-03-12/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-03-12-9,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-03-12},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-03-12/9},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 166226, document A-9-2024-0056, reference 2023-0085. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}