Skip to content

Decision

Critical situation in Cuba

Effect
Adopted
Result
285 for · 172 against · 46 abstained roll call
Date
29 February 2024, 12:26–12:29
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by a clear majority
Dossier
2024-2584
Source
Motion for a resolution
Votes
23 votes · 17 roll calls · 4 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · Greens (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · S&D (1 roll call, 2 split votes) · EPP (1 roll call)
Final vote
165987
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 285 for, 172 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a clear majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 14 parts of the text voted on separately (14 adopted). 4 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Greens and S&D; Patriots mostly abstained; ESN split.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 0Against 10Abst. 1Majority line AgainstClear line Against
GreensFor 0Against 20Abst. 3Majority line AgainstClear line Against
S&DFor 8Against 41Abst. 4Majority line AgainstClear line Against
RenewFor 33Against 1Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 70Against 2Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 17Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
PatriotsFor 8Against 0Abst. 12Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided
ESNFor 1Against 1Abst. 1Majority line TieClear line Divided
No groupFor 0Against 4Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 503 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 23

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 1 Situation critique à Cuba - Critical situation in Cuba - Kritische Lage in Kuba - Situation critique à Cuba - Critical situation in Cuba - Kritische Lage in Kuba - RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 1 Roll call325 for, 184 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 2 Roll call498 for, 4 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D
3Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 RC-B9-0144/2024 - Après le § 3 - Am 1 Roll call210 for, 284 against, 39 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D, EPP
Show the other 22 votesShow the other 20 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 2 Roll call498 for, 4 against, 30 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D
3Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 RC-B9-0144/2024 - Après le § 3 - Am 1 Roll call210 for, 284 against, 39 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D, EPP
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 4 — part 1 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 4/1 Part voted on: “Is concerned at the alarming increase in the number of political prisoners, which has risen more than eightfold since 2018;”Roll call482 for, 32 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D; split: Greens, S&D, The Left
5Paragraph 4 — part 2 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 4/2 Part voted on: “making Cuba the biggest prison for political activists and dissidents in Latin America”Roll call296 for, 191 against, 41 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D; split: Greens, S&D, The Left
6Paragraph 4 — part 3 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 4/3 Part voted on: “calls for the immediate and unconditional release of individuals detained solely for exercising their human rights, including the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly; further calls for the dismissal of unjust criminal charges and supports the facilitation of the return of those in exile;”Roll call482 for, 24 against, 25 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D; split: Greens, S&D, The Left
7Paragraph 6 — part 1 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 6/1 Part voted on: “Reiterates its firm and unconditional support for the Cuban people, for all human rights defenders in Cuba and for their commendable dedication to freedoms and all rights”Roll call504 for, 8 against, 22 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D; split: Greens, S&D
8Paragraph 6 — part 2 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 6/2 Part voted on: “which the Cuban regime has denied for decades;”Roll call312 for, 180 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D; split: Greens, S&D
9Separate vote on paragraph 7 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 7 Roll call321 for, 35 against, 173 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
10Paragraph 8 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Notes that in November 2023, members of the Cuban Parliament, including the Secretary of the Cuban National Parliament, Homero Acosta, were treated respectfully and received warmly at the European Parliament; declares the continued exclusion of the European Parliament, which is the sole European institution denied access to Cuban territory, to be unacceptable and a violation of the PDCA; rejects Cuba’s decision to refuse a visit by an ad hoc delegation from Parliament and urges the Cuban authorities to adhere to the principles of the PDCA and grant Parliament access to the country;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
11Paragraph 8 — part 2 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 8/2 Part voted on: ‘requests that, in accordance with the PDCA’s principles of equality, reciprocity and mutual respect, similar measures be adopted, denying access to Parliament’s premises to any representative of the National Assembly of People’s Power’Roll call286 for, 200 against, 42 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: The Left
12Paragraph 8 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘requests that, in accordance with the PDCA’s principles of equality, reciprocity and mutual respect, similar measures be adopted, denying access to Parliament’s premises to any representative of the National Assembly of People’s Power’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
13Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 RC-B9-0144/2024 - Après le § 8 - Am 2 Roll call208 for, 279 against, 43 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D, EPP
14Separate vote on paragraph 9 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 9 Roll call469 for, 32 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D
15Separate vote on paragraph 10 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 10 Roll call302 for, 198 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
16Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 RC-B9-0144/2024 - Après le § 10 - Am 3 Roll call244 for, 256 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D, EPP
17Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 RC-B9-0144/2024 - Après le § 10 - Am 4 Roll call219 for, 267 against, 44 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens, S&D, EPP
18Separate vote on paragraph 11 RC-B9-0144/2024 - § 11 Roll call306 for, 192 against, 33 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
19Final vote — text as a whole RC-B9-0144/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call285 for, 172 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP
20Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0144/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
21Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0145/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
22Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0148/2024 Show of hands Lapsed
23Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0151/2024 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D, EPP · split votes by The Left (2), Greens (2), S&D (2).

Text

The text voted on.

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2584(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 29 February 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 29 February 2024 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Critical situation in Cuba”. Decision, 29 February 2024. votingId 165987, document B-9-2024-0148, reference 2024-2584. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-29/13 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 February 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 February 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-02-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-02-29/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-02-29-13,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Critical situation in Cuba}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-02-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-29/13}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-29/13},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 165987, document B-9-2024-0148, reference 2024-2584. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-02-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}