Decision

Situation in Serbia following the elections

Effect: Adopted
Result: 461 for · 53 against · 43 abstained roll call
Date: 8 February 2024, 12:16
Kind: Resolution

More facts (8)

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Motion B-9-2024-0132
Dossier: 2024-2521
Source: Motion for a resolution
Votes: 11 votes · 1 roll call
Requested by: Greens (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (1 split vote) · ECR (1 split vote)
Sitting: Thursday 8 February 2024
Final vote: 164395

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Motion B-9-2024-0132
Dossier: 2024-2521
Source: Motion for a resolution
Votes: 11 votes · 1 roll call
Requested by: Greens (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (1 split vote) · ECR (1 split vote)
Sitting: Thursday 8 February 2024
Final vote: 164395

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
Group	For	Against	Abst.	Majority line	Clear line
The Left	For 9	Against 0	Abst. 2	Majority line For	Clear line For
Greens	For 24	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
S&D	For 49	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
Renew	For 38	Against 0	Abst. 0	Majority line For	Clear line For
EPP	For 77	Against 1	Abst. 2	Majority line For	Clear line For
ECR	For 13	Against 2	Abst. 10	Majority line For	Clear line Divided
Patriots	For 0	Against 14	Abst. 8	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided
ESN	For 0	Against 2	Abst. 0	Majority line Against	Clear line Against
No group	For 1	Against 3	Abst. 1	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 557 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 11

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
1	Paragraph 26 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘vocal’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
2	Paragraph 26 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “that word”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
3	Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to immediately start the audit of the funding provided to the Serbian Government under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance III (IPA III) and other financial instruments’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP

Show the other 10 votesShow the other 8 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Paragraph 26 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “that word”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: ECR
3	Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to immediately start the audit of the funding provided to the Serbian Government under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance III (IPA III) and other financial instruments’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Counted	307 for, 228 against, 19 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
5	Final vote — text as a whole RC-B9-0106/2024 – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)	Roll call	461 for, 53 against, 43 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: Greens, Renew
6	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0106/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed
7	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0108/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed
8	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0131/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed
9	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0132/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed
10	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0133/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed
11	Alternative motion for a resolution B9-0134/2024	Show of hands	Lapsed

Roll calls requested by Greens, Renew · split votes by EPP, ECR.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-9-2024-0132

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's resolution on Serbia after the 17 December 2023 early parliamentary elections notes the OSCE/ODIHR observation mission found the vote ran smoothly but with procedural deficiencies. It welcomes some electoral amendments, calls for full investigation of complaints and attacks, and urges prompt formation of a functioning parliament and government.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2521(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Situation in Serbia following elections

Parliament adopted the text on 8 February 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier

Tabled for plenary (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 8 February 2024 (done)
Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-08/6
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 February 2024 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 8 February 2024 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-02-08
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Situation in Serbia following the elections”. Decision, 8 February 2024. votingId 164395, document B-9-2024-0132, reference 2024-2521. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-08/6 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 February 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 February 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-02-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-02-08/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2024-02-08-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Situation in Serbia following the elections}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-02-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-08/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-02-08/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 164395, document B-9-2024-0132, reference 2024-2521. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-02-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-02-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}