Skip to content

Decision

EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries

Effect
Adopted
Result
402 for · 95 against · 57 abstained roll call
Date
18 January 2024, 12:24–12:28
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Dossier
2023-2124
Source
Committee report by Niclas Herbst
Votes
26 votes · 21 roll calls · 14 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · MEPs (4 split votes, 1 separate vote)
Final vote
163093
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 402 for, 95 against, 57 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (7 adopted, 7 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted).

Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left and Greens.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 0Against 9Abst. 1Majority line AgainstClear line Against
GreensFor 1Against 24Abst. 1Majority line AgainstClear line Against
S&DFor 48Against 5Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 33Against 1Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 67Against 0Abst. 2Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 12Against 0Abst. 9Majority line ForClear line Divided
PatriotsFor 22Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
ESNFor 3Against 0Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
No groupFor 1Against 1Abst. 3Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 554 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 26

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 1 – Am 1 Roll call347 for, 177 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
2Separate vote on paragraph 7 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 7 Roll call419 for, 124 against, 11 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs
3Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 2 Roll call331 for, 202 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
Show the other 25 votesShow the other 23 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 7 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 7 Roll call419 for, 124 against, 11 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs
3Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 2 Roll call331 for, 202 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 3 Roll call294 for, 215 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
5Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 11 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 11 – Am 4 Roll call259 for, 255 against, 35 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
6Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Highlights that MPAs are diverse in terms of size, species, habitats and ecosystems to be protected, are established with different conservation objectives, and should not be seen as uniform areas that all bring the benefits of well-managed MPAs for marine ecosystems;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: MEPs
7Paragraph 13 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 13/2 Part voted on: ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’Roll call425 for, 122 against, 11 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs
8Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: MEPs
9Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 5 Roll call325 for, 211 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
10Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 13 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 6 Roll call239 for, 251 against, 63 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
11Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 14 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 14 – Am 7 Roll call189 for, 330 against, 42 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
12Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 17 – Am 8 Roll call279 for, 206 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
13Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 18 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 9 Roll call177 for, 343 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
14Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 18 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 10 Roll call187 for, 308 against, 53 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
15Separate vote on paragraph 19 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: MEPs
16Paragraph 19 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 19/2 Part voted on: “considers however, that the action plan takes some steps in the opposite direction, in particular in relation to its proposals on bottom trawling;”Roll call402 for, 135 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs
17Separate vote on paragraph 23 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: MEPs
18Paragraph 23 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 23/2 Part voted on: ‘and that it should be, in priority, regulated in the framework of the Technical Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 2019/1241 ), whose aim is, as its title indicates, ‘the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems’;’Roll call360 for, 134 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs
19Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 11 Roll call252 for, 284 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
20Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 12 Roll call233 for, 289 against, 37 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
21Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 13 Roll call146 for, 397 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
22Separate vote on paragraph 24 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: MEPs
23Paragraph 24 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 24/2 Part voted on: “they are considered by science as sustainable and compatible with achieving seabed conservation objectives or stocks being exploited above maximum sustainable yield levels;”Roll call317 for, 189 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs
24Separate vote on paragraph 25 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 25 Roll call425 for, 121 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs
25Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 39 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 39 – Am 14 Roll call276 for, 265 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
26Final vote — text as a whole A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call402 for, 95 against, 57 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens · split votes by MEPs (4) · separate votes by MEPs.

Text

The text voted on.

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/2124(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 18 January 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 12 July 2023 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 7 December 2023 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 14 December 2023 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 January 2024 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: PECH · Author: Niclas HERBST (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries”. Decision, 18 January 2024. votingId 163093, document A-9-2023-0437, reference 2023-2124. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-01-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-01-18-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-01-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 163093, document A-9-2023-0437, reference 2023-2124. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}