Decision
EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries
- Effect
- Adopted
- Result
- 402 for · 95 against · 57 abstained roll call
- Date
- 18 January 2024, 12:24–12:28
- Kind
- Resolution
More facts (8)
- Margin
- by a large majority
- Text
- Report A-9-2023-0437
- Dossier
- 2023-2124
- Source
- Committee report by Niclas Herbst
- Votes
- 26 votes · 21 roll calls · 14 amendments
- Requested by
- The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call) · MEPs (4 split votes, 1 separate vote)
- Sitting
- Thursday 18 January 2024
- Final vote
- 163093
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 402 for, 95 against, 57 abstained (roll call).
Adopted by a large majority.
Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (7 adopted, 7 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted).
Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left and Greens.
Groups
Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | Majority line | Clear line | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 0 | Against 9 | Abst. 1 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | |
| Greens | For 1 | Against 24 | Abst. 1 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | |
| S&D | For 48 | Against 5 | Abst. 1 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| Renew | For 33 | Against 1 | Abst. 1 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| EPP | For 67 | Against 0 | Abst. 2 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| ECR | For 12 | Against 0 | Abst. 9 | Majority line For | Clear line Divided | |
| Patriots | For 22 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| ESN | For 3 | Against 0 | Abst. 1 | Majority line For | Clear line For | |
| No group | For 1 | Against 1 | Abst. 3 | Majority line Abstained | Clear line Divided |
Voted against their group, 0
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
The breakdown by country is not available right now.
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.
Debate speakers and how they voted
The debate speakers are not available right now.
All votes on this decision, 26
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 1 – Am 1 | Roll call | 347 for, 177 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 7 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 7 | Roll call | 419 for, 124 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs |
| 3 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 2 | Roll call | 331 for, 202 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
Show the other 25 votesShow the other 23 votes
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Separate vote on paragraph 7 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 7 | Roll call | 419 for, 124 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs |
| 3 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 2 | Roll call | 331 for, 202 against, 15 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 10 – Am 3 | Roll call | 294 for, 215 against, 46 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 5 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 11 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 11 – Am 4 | Roll call | 259 for, 255 against, 35 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 6 | Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Highlights that MPAs are diverse in terms of size, species, habitats and ecosystems to be protected, are established with different conservation objectives, and should not be seen as uniform areas that all bring the benefits of well-managed MPAs for marine ecosystems;” | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: MEPs |
| 7 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 13/2 Part voted on: ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’ | Roll call | 425 for, 122 against, 11 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs |
| 8 | Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘considers, therefore, that the Commission’s action plan presents an oversimplified and over-generalised approach, thus giving the impression that all MPAs can be implemented and managed in the same way, illustrated for example by proposals related to certain fishing gears and to the phase-out of mobile bottom fishing in all MPAs by 2030;’ | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: MEPs |
| 9 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 5 | Roll call | 325 for, 211 against, 19 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 10 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 13 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 6 | Roll call | 239 for, 251 against, 63 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 11 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 14 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 14 – Am 7 | Roll call | 189 for, 330 against, 42 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 12 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 17 – Am 8 | Roll call | 279 for, 206 against, 68 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 13 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 18 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 9 | Roll call | 177 for, 343 against, 38 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 14 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 18 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 18 – Am 10 | Roll call | 187 for, 308 against, 53 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 15 | Separate vote on paragraph 19 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: MEPs |
| 16 | Paragraph 19 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 19/2 Part voted on: “considers however, that the action plan takes some steps in the opposite direction, in particular in relation to its proposals on bottom trawling;” | Roll call | 402 for, 135 against, 9 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs |
| 17 | Separate vote on paragraph 23 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: MEPs |
| 18 | Paragraph 23 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 23/2 Part voted on: ‘and that it should be, in priority, regulated in the framework of the Technical Measures Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 2019/1241 ), whose aim is, as its title indicates, ‘the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems’;’ | Roll call | 360 for, 134 against, 58 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs |
| 19 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 11 | Roll call | 252 for, 284 against, 11 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 20 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 12 | Roll call | 233 for, 289 against, 37 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 21 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 23 – Am 13 | Roll call | 146 for, 397 against, 15 abstained Rejected | Requested byroll call: The Left |
| 22 | Separate vote on paragraph 24 | Show of hands | Adopted | Requested bysplit: MEPs |
| 23 | Paragraph 24 — part 2 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 24/2 Part voted on: “they are considered by science as sustainable and compatible with achieving seabed conservation objectives or stocks being exploited above maximum sustainable yield levels;” | Roll call | 317 for, 189 against, 51 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; split: MEPs |
| 24 | Separate vote on paragraph 25 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – § 25 | Roll call | 425 for, 121 against, 14 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens; separate: MEPs |
| 25 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 39 A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – After § 39 – Am 14 | Roll call | 276 for, 265 against, 13 abstained Adopted | Requested byroll call: Greens |
| 26 | Final vote — text as a whole A9-0437/2023 – Niclas Herbst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) | Roll call | 402 for, 95 against, 57 abstained Adopted |
Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens · split votes by MEPs (4) · separate votes by MEPs.
Text
The text voted on.
Dossier
Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.
2023/2124(INI) · Own-initiative report
Parliament adopted the text on 18 January 2024. This is its final position on the matter.
Show the 5 steps of the dossier
- Referred to committee · 12 July 2023 (done)
- Committee work · Report adopted 7 December 2023 (done)
- Tabled for plenary · 14 December 2023 (done)
- Plenary vote · Adopted 18 January 2024 (done)
- Parliament’s position · Final (done)
Lead committee: PECH · Author: Niclas HERBST (EPP)
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
No connections found for this decision.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries”. Decision, 18 January 2024. votingId 163093, document A-9-2023-0437, reference 2023-2124. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-01-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-01-18-8,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{EU Action Plan: protecting and restoring marine ecosystems for sustainable and resilient fisheries}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-01-18},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/8},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 163093, document A-9-2023-0437, reference 2023-2124. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}