Skip to content

Decision

Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2022 and 2023

Effect
Adopted
Result
391 for · 130 against · 20 abstained roll call
Date
18 January 2024, 12:34–12:40
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Dossier
2023-2028
Source
Committee report by Katarina Barley
Votes
49 votes · 28 roll calls · 24 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 split vote) · EPP (4 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ID (1 roll call, 2 split votes)
Final vote
163150
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 391 for, 130 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 24 amendments (24 rejected) and 24 parts of the text voted on separately (18 adopted, 6 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 9Against 0Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
GreensFor 25Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
S&DFor 52Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 33Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 58Against 6Abst. 5Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 0Against 19Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
PatriotsFor 0Against 22Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
ESNFor 0Against 4Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
No groupFor 1Against 1Abst. 3Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 541 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 49

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Calls for a swift agreement on the anti-SLAPP directive, which should offer substantive and broad protection against abusive lawsuits;”Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: S&D
2Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to implement the Commission Recommendation on protecting journalists and human rights defenders that engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings, and specifically to remove prison sentences for defamation cases, decriminalise defamation and favour civil or administrative procedures instead; urges the Commission to address the seriousness of SLAPPs brought through criminal proceedings by presenting a proposal for measures to ensure that defamation, libel and slander, which constitute criminal offences in most Member States, cannot be used for SLAPPs through public or private prosecution; stresses that SLAPPs are only one method used to silence journalists and calls on the Commission to further investigate other practices and to intervene; calls on politicians to publicly condemn threats and attacks against journalists;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: S&D
3Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 7 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After § 7 – Am 22 Roll call143 for, 379 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ID
Show the other 48 votesShow the other 46 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to implement the Commission Recommendation on protecting journalists and human rights defenders that engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings, and specifically to remove prison sentences for defamation cases, decriminalise defamation and favour civil or administrative procedures instead; urges the Commission to address the seriousness of SLAPPs brought through criminal proceedings by presenting a proposal for measures to ensure that defamation, libel and slander, which constitute criminal offences in most Member States, cannot be used for SLAPPs through public or private prosecution; stresses that SLAPPs are only one method used to silence journalists and calls on the Commission to further investigate other practices and to intervene; calls on politicians to publicly condemn threats and attacks against journalists;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: S&D
3Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 7 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After § 7 – Am 22 Roll call143 for, 379 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ID
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands Rejected
5Amendment 16 to paragraph 10 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 10 – Am 16D Roll call120 for, 400 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
6Separate vote on paragraph 10 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ID
7Paragraph 10 — part 2 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 10/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call406 for, 126 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID; split: ID
8Separate vote on paragraph 22 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: EPP
9Separate vote on paragraph 24 Show of hands RejectedRequested bysplit: EPP
10Separate vote on paragraph 24 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
11Separate vote on paragraph 24 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
12Vote on text inserted after paragraph 24 Show of hands Rejected
13Amendment 26 to paragraph 25 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 25 – Am 26 Roll call144 for, 378 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ID
14Paragraph 26 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: “Welcomes the activation of the EU Temporary Protection Directive (TPD) following the war in Ukraine,”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ID, EPP
15Paragraph 26 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “which aims to ensure access to protection for refugees and asylum seekers of any origin; recalls that access to accommodation, employment, education, healthcare and social welfare services under the TPD must take into account a gender approach;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ID, EPP
16Paragraph 26 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “deplores the unequal treatment, racial discrimination and violence faced by non-Ukrainians fleeing the conflict, in particular people of colour and LGBTIQ+ people; deplores the double standards on migrants and refugees in the EU and calls for an end to this situation;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ID, EPP
17Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 31 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After § 31 – Am 27 Roll call247 for, 273 against, 15 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ID
18Amendment 17 to paragraph 34 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 34 – Am 17D Roll call99 for, 402 against, 25 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
19Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Recalls that gender-based violence is highly prevalent in all Member States across the EU; strongly condemns the rapid backsliding on women’s and LGBTIQ+ rights in several Member States;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
20Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘strongly condemns the denial of access to safe and legal abortion services as it is a form of gender-based violence; highlights that the ECtHR has ruled that restrictive abortion laws and lack of implementation violate women’s right to bodily autonomy and integrity; reiterates its condemnation of Poland’s law that imposes a near total ban on abortion; recalls that citizens who help people to access abortion services when it is not freely or legally available should not be persecuted; reiterates its call for the right to abortion to be included in the Charter;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
21Amendment 18 to paragraph 35 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 35 – Am 18D Roll call89 for, 413 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
22Amendment 19 to paragraph 37 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 37 – Am 19 Roll call116 for, 403 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
23Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 37 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After § 37 – Am 20 Roll call139 for, 390 against, 11 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
24Vote on text inserted after paragraph 41 Show of hands Rejected
25Amendment 21 to paragraph 43 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – § 43 – Am 21D Roll call118 for, 415 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
26Vote on text inserted after paragraph 54 Show of hands Rejected
27Amendment 1, adding text after citation 3 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After citation 3 – Am 1 Roll call133 for, 396 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
28Amendment 2 to citation 4 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 4 – Am 2D Roll call117 for, 420 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
29Amendment 3 to citation 15 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 15 – Am 3D Roll call111 for, 419 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
30Amendment 4 to citation 17 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 17 – Am 4D Roll call113 for, 418 against, 10 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
31Amendment 5 to citation 22 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 22 – Am 5D Roll call113 for, 419 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
32Amendment 6 to citation 34 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 34 – Am 6D Roll call95 for, 418 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
33Amendment 7 to citation 47 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 47 – Am 7D Roll call114 for, 409 against, 7 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
34Amendment 8 to citation 48 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 48 – Am 8D Roll call115 for, 418 against, 9 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
35Amendment 9 to citation 50 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 50 – Am 9D Roll call116 for, 407 against, 6 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
36Amendment 10 to citation 53 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Citation 53 – Am 10D Roll call115 for, 408 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
37Amendment 11, adding text after recital A A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After recital A – Am 11 Roll call203 for, 323 against, 13 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
38Separate vote on recital G Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
39Recital G — part 2 A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Recital G/2 Part voted on: “whereas the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation aims to protect the Union budget against breaches of rule of law principles;”Roll call411 for, 127 against, 9 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
40Separate vote on recital M Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: EPP
41Separate vote on recital O Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: EPP
42Amendment 12 to recital P A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Recital P – Am 12 Roll call118 for, 402 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
43Recital P — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: and rights, such as on existing legal protections for women’s access to abortion care; whereas, in recent years, the denial of access to safe and legal abortion in some Member States has led to the death of a number of women;’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
44Recital P — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: EPP
45Separate vote on recital R A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Recital R Roll call418 for, 76 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ID
46Amendment 13 to recital U A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Recital U – Am 13D Roll call114 for, 415 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
47Amendment 14, adding text after recital AA A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After recital AA – Am 14 Roll call223 for, 309 against, 3 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
48Amendment 15, adding text after recital AA A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – After recital AA – Am 15 Roll call114 for, 417 against, 20 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
49Final vote — text as a whole A9-0376/2023 – Katarina Barley – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole) Roll call391 for, 130 against, 20 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by ECR, ID · split votes by S&D, EPP (4), ECR, ID (2) · separate votes by EPP.

Text

The text voted on.

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/2028(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 18 January 2024. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 16 March 2023 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 13 November 2023 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 28 November 2023 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 January 2024 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Author: Katarina BARLEY (S&D)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2022 and 2023”. Decision, 18 January 2024. votingId 163150, document A-9-2023-0376, reference 2023-2028. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-01-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-01-18-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2022 and 2023}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-01-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-18/12},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 163150, document A-9-2023-0376, reference 2023-2028. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}