Skip to content

Decision

Policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company, commercial and intellectual property law issues

Effect
Adopted
Result
491 for · 106 against · 35 abstained roll call
Date
17 January 2024, 12:42
Kind
Resolution
More facts (7)
Margin
by a large majority
Dossier
2023-2062
Source
Committee report by Axel Voss, Ibán García del Blanco
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
163053
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 491 for, 106 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by The Left and Greens; ESN split.

Groups

Members counted in their current group: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Members’ votes by their current group. Majority: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group’s votes, otherwise Divided.
GroupForAgainstAbst.Majority lineClear lineBar
The LeftFor 3Against 10Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against
GreensFor 0Against 26Abst. 1Majority line AgainstClear line Against
S&DFor 57Against 0Abst. 4Majority line ForClear line For
RenewFor 40Against 0Abst. 0Majority line ForClear line For
EPPFor 85Against 1Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
ECRFor 20Against 3Abst. 1Majority line ForClear line For
PatriotsFor 24Against 0Abst. 5Majority line ForClear line For
ESNFor 0Against 2Abst. 2Majority line TieClear line Divided
No groupFor 2Against 4Abst. 0Majority line AgainstClear line Against

Voted against their group, 0

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast) of their group — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Nobody voted against a clear line of their group.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

The breakdown by country is not available right now.

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call — groups as of today: the view with groups at the date of the vote is not available right now.

Show all 632 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

The debate speakers are not available right now.

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution A9-0442/2023 – Axel Voss, Ibán García del Blanco – Motion for a resolution Roll call491 for, 106 against, 35 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

Loading the dossier…

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company, commercial and intellectual property law issues”. Decision, 17 January 2024. votingId 163053, document A-9-2023-0442, reference 2023-2062. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-17/15 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 January 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-01-17/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2024-01-17-15,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Policy implications of the development of virtual worlds – civil, company, commercial and intellectual property law issues}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-01-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-17/15}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2024-01-17/15},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 163053, document A-9-2023-0442, reference 2023-2062. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-01-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-01-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}