Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY44.9 %21547948.5 %

Where they differed, 264

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERManon AUBRY
26 Nov 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216AgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP23211AgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP915635AgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize MON 810AgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinationsAgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton COT102AgainstFor
26 Nov 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603AgainstFor
14 Nov 2024 Final vote on the draft Council decision Amendment of the EIB’s StatuteForAbstained
14 Nov 2024 Final vote Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding TaxesForAgainst
14 Nov 2024 Final vote Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationForAgainst
23 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAbstained
18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for cyproconazoleAgainstFor
18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methylAgainstFor

Show all 14 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}