Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Manon AUBRY The Left · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Manon AUBRY The Left · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY | 52.2 % | 2 330 | 4 465 | 50.9 % |
Where they differed, 2 135
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Manon AUBRY |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2024 Amendment 314 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sections | Against | For |
| 23 Oct 2024 Amendment 313 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sections | Against | For |
| 23 Oct 2024 Amendment 332 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sections | Against | For |
| 23 Oct 2024 Amendment 309 Draft general budget of the European Union for 2025 – all sections | Against | For |
| 10 Oct 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 22 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 9 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | Against | For |
| 9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 1 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 9 — part 2 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration | For | Against |
| 9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 8 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration | For | Abstained |
| 9 Oct 2024 Amendment 1 to paragraph 7 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration | Abstained | Against |
| 7 Oct 2024 Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group | Against | For |
| 18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole | Against | For |
| 18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl | Against | For |
| 18 Jul 2024 Request by The Left Group — Motion for adjournment of the vote Request by The Left Group – Motion for adjournment of the vote on the election of the President of the Commission | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 8 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 7 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 6 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 5 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 4 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 2 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | Abstained |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | Against | For |
| 17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 3 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine | For | Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}