Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Manon AUBRY The Left · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Manon AUBRY The Left · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY | 52.2 % | 2 330 | 4 465 | 50.9 % |
Where they differed, 2 135
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Manon AUBRY |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2026 Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 6 to recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after recital C The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Serbia | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 2025 Commission report on Serbia | Against | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Moldova | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 108 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 101 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 78 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 71 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 71 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 66 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 33 to paragraph 30 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 29 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 29 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 27 — part 4 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 27 — part 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 24 — part 2 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 18 — part 4 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Paragraph 18 — part 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 14 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 13 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Morocco Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of Morocco in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA): amendment and supplement | For | Abstained |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU–Mexico Interim Agreement on Trade | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Final vote — text as a whole EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | For | Against |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after recital J EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | Against | For |
| 8 Jul 2026 Amendment 39 to paragraph 59 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}