Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Manon AUBRY The Left · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Manon AUBRY The Left · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY | 52.2 % | 2 330 | 4 465 | 50.9 % |
Where they differed, 2 135
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Manon AUBRY |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 1 Public procurement | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Paragraph 13 — part 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Paragraph 34 — part 2 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Paragraph 32 — part 1 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 9 to recital B Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | For | Against |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | For | Against |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital U The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 24 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | For | Against |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 23 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 20 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 20 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 18 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | For | Abstained |
| 9 Jul 2025 Paragraph 15 — part 2 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | For | Abstained |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 9 to paragraph 8 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 4 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | For | Against |
| 9 Jul 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Separate vote on citation 15 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Paragraph 56 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Against | For |
| 9 Jul 2025 Paragraph 37 — part 7 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 28 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp 5a7357168c2a, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 28 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-28,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28},
urldate = {2026-09-28},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}