Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY52.2 %2 3304 46550.9 %

Where they differed, 2 135

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERManon AUBRY
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstFor
11 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketForAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole A new vision for the European Universities alliancesForAbstained
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 5 to recital A Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of CyprusForAgainst
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 4 Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of CyprusAgainstFor
11 Sept 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 2 Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of CyprusAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceForAbstained
10 Sept 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after recital F Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceForAbstained
10 Sept 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 16 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceForAbstained
10 Sept 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 13 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Paragraph 12 — part 2 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interferenceAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisisAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Separate vote on recital O Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisisAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 49 Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of VanuatuForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Securities settlement in the EU and central securities depositories (CSDs): shorter settlement cycle in the UnionForAbstained
10 Sept 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengtheningForAgainst
10 Sept 2025 Proposal to vote on amendments Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Amendments 79 + 81 (voted as one) Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewAgainstFor
10 Sept 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement European Social Fund (ESF+): specific measures to address strategic challengesForAgainst
9 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineForAgainst
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Public procurementForAgainst
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital N Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital N Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementForAgainst
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 Public procurementAgainstFor
9 Sept 2025 Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAgainstFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-29
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-29 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 29 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-29}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-29},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}