Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Manon AUBRY52.2 %2 3304 46550.9 %

Where they differed, 2 135

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERManon AUBRY
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton MON 88913AgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302AgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize DAS1131AgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sectorForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Recital M — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on citation 10 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)ForAbstained
25 Nov 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)ForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Proposal to vote on amendments European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)AgainstFor
25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings; enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimesForAgainst
25 Nov 2025 Proposal to reject the text European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)AgainstAbstained
24 Nov 2025 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Gaza Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – GazaAgainstFor
24 Nov 2025 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)ForAbstained
13 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital AC Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital Z Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital H Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Recital D — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 86 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 84 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 83 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 79 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 78 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 74 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 73 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 72 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 59 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 57 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 30 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 29 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 27 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 21 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 16 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstFor
13 Nov 2025 Final vote Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)ForAbstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 28 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp 5a7357168c2a, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-28,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Manon AUBRY · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C197533&scope=all&to=2026-09-28},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}