Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 2 592

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
22 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2024: entering the surplus of the financial year 2023ForAgainst
22 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 6 Draft amending budget No 2/2024: entering the surplus of the financial year 2023ForAgainst
10 Oct 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5 The case of Bülent Mumay in TürkiyeAgainstFor
10 Oct 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 The case of Bülent Mumay in TürkiyeAgainstAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on recital O The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 22 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 9 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 2 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaAgainstFor
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 1 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 1 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaAgainstFor
9 Oct 2024 Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAbstained
9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 17 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Paragraph 9 — part 2 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 8 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAgainst
9 Oct 2024 Amendment 1 to paragraph 7 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationAbstainedFor
9 Oct 2024 Separate vote on paragraph 5 Strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integrationForAbstained
7 Oct 2024 Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupAgainstFor
18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for cyproconazoleAgainstFor
18 Sept 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methylAgainstFor
17 Jul 2024 Final vote — text as a whole The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Separate vote on recital E The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAgainstAbstained
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 7 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 6 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 5 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAbstained
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 4 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAbstained
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 2 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 5 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 4 — part 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 4 — part 2 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAbstained
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 4 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAgainstFor
17 Jul 2024 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAgainstFor
17 Jul 2024 Paragraph 3 — part 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineForAgainst
17 Jul 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineAgainstFor
17 Jul 2024 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupAgainstFor

Show all 42 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}