Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 2 592
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 39, adding text after recital Q 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 84 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 67 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 65 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 43 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE Public procurement | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 39, adding text after recital R Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital N Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital N Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after recital L Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Separate vote on recital H Public procurement | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 71 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 Public procurement | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 65 — part 1 Public procurement | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurement | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 63 — part 3 Public procurement | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 61 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 8 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurement | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 28 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp 5a7357168c2a, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-28
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 28 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-28 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-28,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 28 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-28}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-28},
urldate = {2026-09-28},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}