Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 2 592
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates | Against | For |
| 26 Nov 2025 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize MON 87427 | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 87708 | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton MON 88913 | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize DAS1131 | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budget | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 2024 budget: assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budget | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital M — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on citation 11 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on citation 10 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 22 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 12 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 12 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 9 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 8 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BH — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BH — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BG Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital BF Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 3 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BE — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Recital BD — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital AP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after recital J Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital H Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 4 to recital E Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | Against | For |
| 25 Nov 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | For | Against |
| 25 Nov 2025 Amendment 17 to paragraph 28 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 30 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC (data stamp 772c7b2d0380, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 30 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-30,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30},
urldate = {2026-09-30},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}