Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 2 592

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
21 Jan 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstAbstained
21 Jan 2026 Paragraph 14 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAbstained
21 Jan 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstFor
21 Jan 2026 Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 8 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstFor
21 Jan 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstAbstained
21 Jan 2026 Final vote Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of a Loan for UkraineForAgainst
21 Jan 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstFor
21 Jan 2026 Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)AgainstFor
21 Jan 2026 Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)AgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 3 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 1 to recital H Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital G Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Recital F — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital C Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Paragraph 3 — part 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesForAbstained
20 Jan 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertaintiesForAbstained
20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 3 to recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2 to recital E Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 32, adding text after recital E The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 31, adding text after recital C The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesForAgainst
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 30 to citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstAbstained
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Final vote Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestForAbstained
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 259 to recital 4 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestAgainstFor
20 Jan 2026 Amendment 244, adding text after recital 3 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestAgainstAbstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 30 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC (data stamp 772c7b2d0380, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-30,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}