Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · IE Remove
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 3
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · Ireland
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 3
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER | 81.1 % | 3 266 | 4 025 | 81.6 % |
| Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA | 26.5 % | 1 108 | 4 184 | 29.2 % |
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 3 683
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Barry ANDREWS | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurement | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 13 — part 2 Public procurement | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 8 — part 2 Public procurement | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurement | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurement | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote — text as a whole EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) | For | For | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | For | For | Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 401 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 9 Sept 2025 Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Paragraph 13 — part 2 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | For | For | Abstained |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | For | For | Abstained |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital S Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | Against | Against | For |
| 10 Jul 2025 Amendment 9 to recital B Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus | Against | For | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 1 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC (data stamp 7669c786bb14, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 1 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01 (retrieved 1 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-10-01,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01},
urldate = {2026-10-01},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}