Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · IE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 2
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · Ireland
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 1
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA | 26.5 % | 1 108 | 4 184 | 29.2 % |
Where they differed, 3 076
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Barry ANDREWS | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | Against | Abstained |
| 8 May 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 9 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | For | Abstained |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 Banking Union – annual report 2024 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024 | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 39 Competition policy – annual report 2024 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 8 Competition policy – annual report 2024 | Against | Abstained |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Competition policy – annual report 2024 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Final vote Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Referral back to committee Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 258, adding text after recital 23 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 257 to recital 15 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendments 275 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 20 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendments 274 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 19 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 270 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 279 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 15 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 151 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 122 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 118 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 117 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 100 Screening of foreign investments in the Union | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Final vote The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after recital 1 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season | For | Against |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 8 to recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 18 to recital 5 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 7 to recital 4 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | Abstained |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 6 to recital 3 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 17 to recital 3 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 16 to recital 3 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 5 to recital 2 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 15 to recital 2 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after recital 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 23 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 15, paragraph 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 11 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 22 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 21 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 10 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 2 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 6, paragraph 2, alinéa 1 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | Abstained |
| 8 May 2025 Amendments 9 + 20 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 4, paragraph 1 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendments 3 + 19 (voted as one) to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 1, paragraph 5 bis CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
| 8 May 2025 Amendment 4 to Title CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027 | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 30 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-30,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30},
urldate = {2026-09-30},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}