Skip to content

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %

Where they differed, 3 076

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSJordan BARDELLA
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 15 — part 2 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 15 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 10 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 2 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on recital BM Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after recital BE Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital BC — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital BB — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AZ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on recital AO Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Recital AJ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 49 to recital AG Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Recital W — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 48 to recital S Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 47, adding text after recital P Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 13 to recital M Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 67 to recital H Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on citation 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Citation 44 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on citation 28 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on citation 27 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on citation 17 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 122 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstAbstained
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 122 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 105 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 92 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 87 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 87 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 72 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAbstained
29 Apr 2026 Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstFor
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst
29 Apr 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 69 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainst

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 27 Sept 2026, 03:25 UTC (data stamp e994c83b5003, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-27,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 27 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-27},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}