Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Martin HÄUSLING

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Martin HÄUSLING only. Show every member

Martin HÄUSLING’s votes against the line, 58

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAgainstAbstainedGreens
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 26 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstGreens
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAgainstForGreens
18 Jun 2026Vote on text inserted after recital C Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichForAbstainedGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedForGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point k Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedForGreens
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstGreens
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstainedGreens
20 May 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForGreens
20 May 2026Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForGreens
26 Mar 2026Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAbstainedAgainstGreens
11 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAbstainedForGreens
10 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedAgainstGreens
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 42 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedAgainstGreens
24 Feb 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 3 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedForGreens
24 Feb 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 15 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedForGreens
24 Feb 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 15 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAbstainedForGreens
24 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 12 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAgainstForGreens
9 Feb 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – IsraelAgainstForGreens
21 Jan 2026Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)AbstainedForGreens
26 Nov 2025Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) to paragraph 2 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAbstainedAgainstGreens
26 Nov 2025Amendments 27 + 89 + 130 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAbstainedAgainstGreens
26 Nov 2025Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAbstainedAgainstGreens
26 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAbstainedForGreens
13 Nov 2025Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AbstainedForGreens
13 Nov 2025Recital G — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AbstainedForGreens
13 Nov 2025Amendment 86, adding text after recital 7 Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)AbstainedForGreens
22 Oct 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyAgainstForGreens
22 Oct 2025Amendment 104 to paragraph 58 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAgainstForGreens
22 Oct 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedAgainstGreens
22 Oct 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAbstainedAgainstGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 26, adding text after recital H Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 5 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAbstainedForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 3 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAbstainedForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAgainstForGreens
11 Sept 2025Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAbstainedForGreens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAgainstForGreens
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAbstainedForGreens
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 28 — part 1 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024AgainstForGreens
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupAbstainedForGreens
8 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 Banking Union – annual report 2024AgainstForGreens
8 May 2025Final vote The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus)AbstainedAgainstGreens
8 May 2025Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus)AbstainedForGreens
7 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 55 The European Water Resilience StrategyAbstainedAgainstGreens
Show all 58 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Cyprus (resolution) Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Cyprus (resolution)AbstainedAgainstGreens
2 Apr 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 12 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024AgainstForGreens
2 Apr 2025Amendment 88 to paragraph 69 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024AgainstForGreens
12 Mar 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAbstainedForGreens
17 Dec 2024Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationForAgainstGreens
25 Nov 2024Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupAbstainedForGreens
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Situation in VenezuelaForAgainstGreens
19 Sept 2024Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 3 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesForAgainstGreens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Martin HÄUSLING , Greens · Germany 1.1 %5 5052431321

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Martin HÄUSLING”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=96752&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Martin HÄUSLING}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=96752&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=96752&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}