Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Isilda GOMES only. Show every member
Isilda GOMES’s votes against the line, 30
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 14 to recital R The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report | For | Against | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2026 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024 | For | Against | S&D |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Amendment 61 to paragraph 93 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | Against | S&D |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 23 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit | For | Against | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 9 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Amendment 157, adding text after paragraph 79 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 21 Oct 2025 | Amendment 22 to Article 1 Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group | Against | For | S&D |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurement | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2025 | Paragraph 7 — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EU | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 May 2025 | Amendment 11 to paragraph 14 Competition policy – annual report 2024 | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 7 May 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 57 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye | Against | For | S&D |
| 7 May 2025 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 49 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Separate vote on paragraph 52 White paper on the future of European defence | Against | For | S&D |
| 13 Feb 2025 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 11 Feb 2025 | Amendment 26 to paragraph 18 European Central Bank – annual report 2024 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2024 | Thursday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Thursday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group | Against | For | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 Urgent need to revise the Medical Devices Regulation | For | Against | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Separate vote on paragraph 31 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections | Against | For | S&D |
| 9 Oct 2024 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 9 Oct 2024 | Paragraph 1 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | Against | For | S&D |
| 9 Oct 2024 | Paragraph 1 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia | Against | For | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Venezuela | For | Against | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 3 Situation in Venezuela | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Separate vote on paragraph 2 Situation in Venezuela | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 3 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States | For | Against | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States | For | Against | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Final vote — text as a whole The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus | Against | For | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isilda GOMES , S&D · Portugal | 0.6 % | 5 171 | 21 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}