Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU only. Show every member
Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU’s votes against the line, 16
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Kosovo | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Albania | Against | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Pakistan Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV | Against | For | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Final vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences | Against | For | S&D |
| 11 Mar 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole EU enlargement strategy | Against | For | S&D |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products | Against | For | S&D |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) | For | Against | S&D |
| 16 Dec 2025 | Final vote Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products | Against | For | S&D |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under the InvestEU Regulation and simplifying reporting requirements | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report) | Against | For | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution InvestEU Fund strategic investments in the field of defence | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on North Macedonia | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 23 Jan 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 22 Oct 2024 | Final vote Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine | Abstained | For | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU , S&D · Greece | 2.6 % | 608 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=256829&scope=final&to=2026-09-26
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=256829&scope=final&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sakis ARNAOUTOGLOU}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=256829&scope=final&to=2026-09-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=256829&scope=final&to=2026-09-26},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}