Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nils UŠAKOVS
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Nils UŠAKOVS only. Show every member
Nils UŠAKOVS’s votes against the line, 18
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | For | Against | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | Against | For | S&D |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation) | For | Against | S&D |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept | For | Against | S&D |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level | For | Against | S&D |
| 22 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania | Against | For | S&D |
| 22 Jan 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Dec 2025 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Dec 2025 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Dec 2025 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept | For | Against | S&D |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Final vote Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders | For | Against | S&D |
| 13 Nov 2025 | Final vote Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | For | Against | S&D |
| 21 Oct 2025 | Proposal to reject the text Final vote Monitoring framework for resilient European forests | For | Against | S&D |
| 1 Apr 2025 | Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements | For | Against | S&D |
| 14 Nov 2024 | Final vote Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of application | For | Against | S&D |
| 23 Oct 2024 | Final vote — text as a whole General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections | For | Against | S&D |
| 19 Sept 2024 | Final vote — text as a whole The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba | Abstained | Against | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nils UŠAKOVS , S&D · Latvia | 3.3 % | 543 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197810&scope=final&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nils UŠAKOVS”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197810&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Nils UŠAKOVS}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197810&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197810&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}