Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Siegfried MUREŞAN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Siegfried MUREŞAN only. Show every member

Siegfried MUREŞAN’s votes against the line, 25

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on recital F EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AgainstForEPP
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on KosovoAbstainedForEPP
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 11 How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?ForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AC — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstEPP
26 Mar 2026Amendment 36 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)AgainstForEPP
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 28 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026AgainstForEPP
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAbstainedForEPP
21 Jan 2026Amendment 71 to recital U Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstEPP
21 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 41 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AgainstForEPP
20 Jan 2026Amendment 256, adding text after recital 12 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestForAgainstEPP
20 Jan 2026Amendment 257 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 5 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestForAgainstEPP
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 18 — part 2 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024AbstainedForEPP
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 79 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainstEPP
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 71 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainstEPP
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 64 Gender Equality Strategy 2025ForAgainstEPP
9 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Public procurementForAgainstEPP
19 Jun 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 5 Clean Industrial DealForAgainstEPP
18 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportForAgainstEPP
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on KosovoAbstainedForEPP
3 Apr 2025Amendment 12 to paragraph 3 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstEPP
23 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 88 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForEPP
23 Oct 2024Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 75 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAbstainedForEPP
19 Sept 2024Amendment 21 to paragraph 9 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesForAgainstEPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Siegfried MUREŞAN , EPP · Romania 0.5 %5 41119601

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Siegfried MUREŞAN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=124802&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Siegfried MUREŞAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=124802&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=124802&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}