Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · EPP · Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ only. Show every member
Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ’s votes against the line, 22
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the provisional agreement Coordination of social security systems | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | Against | For | EPP |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Final vote Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) | For | Against | EPP |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton MON 88913 | For | Against | EPP |
| 25 Nov 2025 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize DAS1131 | For | Against | EPP |
| 23 Oct 2025 | Final vote on motion B10-0464/2025 Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels | Abstained | Against | EPP |
| 22 Oct 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: Agencies | Against | For | EPP |
| 8 Oct 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole EU political strategy on Latin America | Against | For | EPP |
| 17 Jun 2025 | Final vote on the draft Council decision Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine amending the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the carriage of freight by road of 29 June 2022 | Against | For | EPP |
| 22 May 2025 | Final vote Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production | Against | For | EPP |
| 8 May 2025 | Final vote Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European Union | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 8 May 2025 | Final vote The protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus) | Against | For | EPP |
| 7 May 2025 | Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye | Abstained | For | EPP |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed | Against | For | EPP |
| 3 Apr 2025 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishing an EU talent pool | Against | For | EPP |
| 18 Dec 2024 | Final vote — text as a whole Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office | Against | For | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ , EPP · Poland | 3.9 % | 568 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 14 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · EPP · Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?group=PPE&mep=257032&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · EPP · Kamila GASIUK-PIHOWICZ}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?group=PPE&mep=257032&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?group=PPE&mep=257032&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}