Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 752

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO’s votes against the line, 15

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 80 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	For	Against	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 53 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	For	Against	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Against	For	EPP
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 86 to Article 7 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund	For	Against	EPP
9 Jul 2026	Paragraph 5 — part 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Against	For	EPP
7 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system	Against	For	EPP
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector	Abstained	Against	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Abstained	Against	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Paragraph 12 — part 3 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU	Abstained	For	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Final vote Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	Abstained	For	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 127, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	For	Against	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 130, adding text after Article 29 (corresponds to Article 34 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferences	For	Against	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 13 to paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	EPP
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 12 to paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	EPP
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 36 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Against	For	EPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO , EPP · Italy	2.4 %	619	11	4	0	5

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124828&to=2026-09-26
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124828&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124828&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124828&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}