Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Andi CRISTEA

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Andi CRISTEA only. Show every member

Andi CRISTEA’s votes against the line, 53

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize MON 87460AgainstForS&D
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 94313AgainstForS&D
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6AgainstForS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAbstainedAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAgainstForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAbstainedForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAbstainedAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowancesAgainstForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowancesAgainstForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 5 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowancesAgainstForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAgainstForS&D
9 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAbstainedForS&D
9 Jul 2026Paragraph 5 — part 3 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified soybean MON 87705AgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital Y Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 — part 3 Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicinesForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related productsForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related productsAgainstForS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)ForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 93 to recital 18 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 90, adding text after Recital 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AgainstForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 95 to Article 12, paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AgainstForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 94 to Article 12, after paragraph 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)AgainstForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1 to recital 34 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to Article 27, paragraph 1, point c Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to Article 6, paragraph 3, after point d Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedAbstainedForS&D
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsAgainstForS&D
30 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 32 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstS&D
Show all 53 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 28 — part 2 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 97 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAbstainedAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 74 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024ForAgainstS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Andi CRISTEA , S&D · Romania 3.6 %1 4853122033

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Andi CRISTEA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=40224&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Andi CRISTEA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=40224&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=40224&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}