Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Guillaume PELTIER

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Guillaume PELTIER only. Show every member

Guillaume PELTIER’s votes against the line, 34

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAgainstAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote Temporary trade-liberalisation measures applicable to Armenian productsAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorsAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on MoldovaAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Protection of the environment through criminal lawAgainstAbstainedECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAgainstForECR
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025AgainstForECR
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025AgainstForECR
7 Jul 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: Application EGF/2026/000 TA 2026 - Technical assistance at the initiative of the CommissionAbstainedForECR
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on KosovoAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAgainstAbstainedECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on MontenegroAgainstForECR
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAgainstAbstainedECR
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesAgainstAbstainedECR
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAgainstAbstainedECR
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/SoliverAbstainedForECR
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsAgainstForECR
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAgainstForECR
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAbstainedAgainstECR
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in IndonesiaAbstainedForECR
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstAbstainedECR
19 May 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAbstainedForECR
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/008 BE/Liberty - BelgiumAbstainedForECR
29 Apr 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Discharge 2024: Joint UndertakingsAgainstForECR
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAbstainedAgainstECR
28 Apr 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: workers affected by imminent job displacementAbstainedForECR
26 Mar 2026Final vote Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsAbstainedForECR
26 Mar 2026Final vote Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedForECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Guillaume PELTIER , ECR · France 25.6 %1331511831

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 185 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Guillaume PELTIER”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=30123&scope=final&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Guillaume PELTIER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=30123&scope=final&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=30123&scope=final&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}