Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Taner KABILOV

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Taner KABILOV only. Show every member

Taner KABILOV’s votes against the line, 53

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstECR
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleForAgainstECR
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleForAgainstECR
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital Z Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Recital B — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Recital B — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 60 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 43 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 41 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 24 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 24 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAbstainedECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAbstainedECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstECR
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027ForAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027AgainstAbstainedECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 88 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 87 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 52 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForECR
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 108 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 80 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 79 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForECR
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 50 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstECR
15 Sept 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstAbstainedECR
9 Jul 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitivenessAbstainedAgainstECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreAgainstForECR
9 Jul 2026Paragraph 7 — part 1 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAgainstForECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAgainstECR
9 Jul 2026Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveForAbstainedECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital N 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForECR
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 102 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstECR
Show all 53 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
8 Jul 2026Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedForECR
8 Jul 2026Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 26 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstECR
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAgainstForECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Taner KABILOV changed group , ECR · Bulgaria in No group for most of the period 11.4 %463425624

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257256&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Taner KABILOV”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257256&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Taner KABILOV}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257256&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257256&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}